H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Andrea Jaeger vs Kim Jones H2H: 0-1
Kim Jones holds a 1–0 lead over Andrea Jaeger in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kim Jones leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Kim Jones won the 1985 Chicago third round 7-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 1985* | Chicago | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Kim Jones | 7-6 6-2 | Andrea Jaeger | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrea Jaeger | #225 | #3 | — | 2,280 | 257 | 90 | 74.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
| Kim Jones | — | — | — | 1,801 | 60 | 103 | 36.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrea Jaeger | Kim Jones | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1979 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,522 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1980 | 62–18 | 77.5% | — | 2,169 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1981 | 61–18 | 77.2% | — | 2,179 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1982 | 65–20 | 76.5% | — | 2,170 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1983 | 50–18 | 73.5% | — | 2,091 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1984 | 9–6 | 60.0% | #42 | 2,015 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1985 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,932 | 0 | 10 | 1978 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,907 | 0 | 10 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1987 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,882 | 0 | 10 | 1980 | 1–10 | 9.1% | — | 1,424 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 6–13 | 31.6% | — | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 4–14 | 22.2% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 20–14 | 58.8% | — | 1,758 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 13–24 | 35.1% | — | 1,667 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 13–18 | 41.9% | — | 1,725 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,677 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |