H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC
Lisa Bonder Kreiss holds a 2–1 lead over Andrea Jaeger in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Lisa Bonder Kreiss leads 2–0 on carpet, while Andrea Jaeger leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lisa Bonder Kreiss won the 1984 Washington Open round of 16 6-0 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lisa Bonder Kreiss | 6-0 6-1 | Andrea Jaeger | Match data | Jan 2, 1984 | R16 | Washington Open | WTA 250 | Carpet |
| Lisa Bonder Kreiss | 6-2 5-7 6-1 | Andrea Jaeger | Match data | Sep 18, 1983* | F | Tokyo Queen's | WTA 250 | Carpet |
| Andrea Jaeger | 6-1 6-2 | Lisa Bonder Kreiss | Match data | May 1, 1982* | QF | Orlando | WTA 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrea Jaeger | #225 | #3 | — | 2,266 | 257 | 90 | 74.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
| Lisa Bonder Kreiss | — | — | — | 1,928 | 148 | 131 | 53.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Andrea Jaeger | Lisa Bonder Kreiss | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1979 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,522 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 9–6 | 60.0% | — | 1,603 | 0 | 1 |
| 1980 | 62–18 | 77.5% | #7 | 2,143 | 0 | 4 | 1982 | 28–15 | 65.1% | — | 1,767 | 0 | 3 |
| 1981 | 61–18 | 77.2% | #4 | 2,178 | 0 | 7 | 1983 | 26–19 | 57.8% | — | 1,884 | 0 | 5 |
| 1982 | 65–20 | 76.5% | #3 | 2,201 | 0 | 9 | 1984 | 31–19 | 62.0% | — | 1,865 | 0 | 5 |
| 1983 | 50–18 | 73.5% | #3 | 2,103 | 0 | 10 | 1985 | 17–22 | 43.6% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 5 |
| 1984 | 9–6 | 60.0% | #42 | 2,024 | 0 | 10 | 1986 | 12–13 | 48.0% | — | 1,733 | 0 | 5 |
| 1985 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,939 | 0 | 10 | 1987 | 12–14 | 46.2% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 5 |
| 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,914 | 0 | 10 | 1988 | 6–14 | 30.0% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 5 |
| 1987 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,899 | 0 | 10 | 1989 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,626 | 0 | 5 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,620 | 0 | 5 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,637 | 0 | 5 |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Andrea Jaeger | Lisa Bonder Kreiss | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 1979 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 1980 | 25 | 4 | 29 | 86.2% | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% | 14 | 3 | 17 | 82.4% | 14 | 7 | 21 | 66.7% | 1982 | 9 | 3 | 12 | 75.0% | 19 | 7 | 26 | 73.1% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% |
| 1981 | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | 15 | 3 | 18 | 83.3% | 16 | 5 | 21 | 76.2% | 22 | 7 | 29 | 75.9% | 1983 | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% |
| 1982 | 17 | 6 | 23 | 73.9% | 15 | 4 | 19 | 78.9% | 11 | 4 | 15 | 73.3% | 22 | 6 | 28 | 78.6% | 1984 | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 15 | 6 | 21 | 71.4% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% |
| 1983 | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 23 | 5 | 28 | 82.1% | 9 | 2 | 11 | 81.8% | 12 | 9 | 21 | 57.1% | 1985 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% |
| 1984 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 1986 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 1985 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1987 | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% |
| 1986 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 33.3% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 1987 | — | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 65 | 21 | 86 | 75.6% | 66 | 20 | 86 | 76.7% | 50 | 14 | 64 | 78.1% | 75 | 34 | 109 | 68.8% | Career | 55 | 44 | 99 | 55.6% | 51 | 37 | 88 | 58.0% | 8 | 13 | 21 | 38.1% | 26 | 35 | 61 | 42.6% |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Andrea Jaeger | Lisa Bonder Kreiss | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 1979 | 1522 | 114.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50.0% | +0.75 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.21 | 1981 | 1604 | 125.7 | — | — | — | — | -14 | — | — | 58.1% | +0.77 | 1–2 (33%) | 3–1 (75%) | 101.3 | +0.03 |
| 1980 | 2144 | 166.9 | — | — | — | — | -20 | -413 | -289 | 74.1% | +1.97 | 7–3 (70%) | 5–1 (83%) | 111.4 | -7.47 | 1982 | 1768 | 139.5 | — | — | — | — | -114 | +66 | — | 61.1% | +0.97 | 9–2 (82%) | 3–4 (43%) | 108.6 | -1.22 |
| 1981 | 2178 | 174.5 | — | — | — | — | +36 | -158 | -155 | 70.3% | +1.78 | 15–5 (75%) | 4–6 (40%) | 106.9 | -9.68 | 1983 | 1885 | 141.7 | — | — | — | — | +6 | -143 | -283 | 55.0% | +0.38 | 7–6 (54%) | 5–2 (71%) | 104.1 | +1.89 |
| 1982 | 2202 | 173.8 | — | — | — | — | +57 | -30 | -141 | 74.7% | +1.94 | 12–2 (86%) | 7–2 (78%) | 109.9 | -8.09 | 1984 | 1865 | 149.0 | — | — | — | — | -23 | +31 | -235 | 60.9% | +0.95 | 7–8 (47%) | 3–6 (33%) | 96.1 | +1.70 |
| 1983 | 2104 | 170.1 | — | — | — | — | -4 | +148 | +47 | 70.7% | +1.71 | 7–4 (64%) | 4–4 (50%) | 96.2 | -3.88 | 1985 | 1796 | 146.1 | — | — | — | — | +42 | +45 | -193 | 41.9% | -0.55 | 10–7 (59%) | 3–6 (33%) | 101.4 | -1.92 |
| 1984 | 2024 | 144.8 | — | — | — | — | +14 | — | — | 65.5% | +1.52 | 0–1 | 0–2 | — | -0.45 | 1986 | 1733 | 125.3 | — | — | — | — | +15 | +70 | — | 54.5% | +0.16 | 3–6 (33%) | 3–1 (75%) | 96.8 | +0.52 |
| 1985 | 1939 | 112.7 | — | — | — | — | +11 | — | — | 47.6% | -0.76 | 1–2 (33%) | 0–2 | — | -0.47 | 1987 | 1704 | 131.7 | — | — | — | — | +25 | +55 | -107 | 48.2% | -0.21 | 1–3 (25%) | 0–2 | — | -0.88 |
| 1986 | 1914 | 98.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -2.33 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | -0.03 | 1988 | 1634 | 129.9 | — | — | — | — | +23 | +65 | — | 34.8% | -0.85 | 2–4 (33%) | 0–1 | — | -1.54 |
| 1987 | 1900 | 104.0 | — | — | — | — | — | +249 | — | 60.0% | +0.70 | 2–0 | — | — | +0.16 | 1989 | 1626 | 98.2 | — | — | — | — | +2 | — | — | 37.5% | -1.38 | 1–1 | — | — | +0.16 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 1621 | 109.4 | — | — | — | — | +3 | — | — | 42.9% | -0.71 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | -0.21 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 1638 | 118.4 | — | — | — | — | +9 | — | — | 50.0% | -0.10 | — | 1–0 | — | +0.13 |
| Career | 2266 | 172.3 | — | — | — | — | +18 | -41 | -153 | 71.0% | +1.72 | 44–18 (71%) | 21–18 (54%) | 107.9 | -8.71 | Career | 1928 | 145.1 | — | — | — | — | 0 | +15 | -216 | 52.6% | +0.24 | 41–40 (51%) | 21–24 (47%) | 99.3 | -0.48 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chris Evert | 5 | 16 | 21 | May 6, 1984 | H2H |
| Martina Navratilova | 4 | 11 | 15 | Jul 4, 1983 | H2H |
| Wendy Turnbull | 5 | 8 | 13 | Feb 4, 1984 | H2H |
| Sylvia Hanika | 10 | 2 | 12 | Jan 3, 1983 | H2H |
| Hana Mandlikova | 5 | 6 | 11 | Jan 14, 1984 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chris Evert | 1 | 8 | 9 | Jun 18, 1987 | H2H |
| Martina Navratilova | 0 | 6 | 6 | Sep 7, 1987 | H2H |
| Laura Arraya | 2 | 4 | 6 | Jul 23, 1985 | H2H |
| Pam Casale | 4 | 1 | 5 | Mar 9, 1988 | H2H |
| Michelle Torres | 2 | 3 | 5 | Sep 18, 1986 | H2H |