H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC
Lisa Bonder Kreiss holds a 2–1 lead over Andrea Jaeger in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Lisa Bonder Kreiss leads 2–0 on carpet, while Andrea Jaeger leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lisa Bonder Kreiss won the 1984 Washington Open round of 16 6-0 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lisa Bonder Kreiss | 6-0 6-1 | Andrea Jaeger | Match data | Jan 6, 1984* | R16 | Washington Open | WTA 500 | Carpet |
| Lisa Bonder Kreiss | 6-2 5-7 6-1 | Andrea Jaeger | Match data | Sep 18, 1983* | F | Tokyo Queen's | WTA 250 | Carpet |
| Andrea Jaeger | 6-1 6-2 | Lisa Bonder Kreiss | Match data | May 1, 1982* | QF | Orlando | WTA 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrea Jaeger | — | #3 | — | 2,265 | 262 | 91 | 74.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 11 |
| Lisa Bonder Kreiss | — | — | — | 1,928 | 148 | 131 | 53.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Andrea Jaeger | Lisa Bonder Kreiss | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1979 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,522 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 9–6 | 60.0% | — | 1,603 | 0 | 1 |
| 1980 | 67–18 | 78.8% | #7 | 2,156 | 0 | 5 | 1982 | 28–15 | 65.1% | — | 1,768 | 0 | 3 |
| 1981 | 61–18 | 77.2% | #4 | 2,181 | 0 | 8 | 1983 | 26–19 | 57.8% | — | 1,885 | 0 | 5 |
| 1982 | 65–21 | 75.6% | #3 | 2,202 | 0 | 10 | 1984 | 31–19 | 62.0% | — | 1,865 | 0 | 5 |
| 1983 | 50–18 | 73.5% | #3 | 2,105 | 0 | 11 | 1985 | 17–22 | 43.6% | — | 1,797 | 0 | 5 |
| 1984 | 9–6 | 60.0% | #42 | 2,025 | 0 | 11 | 1986 | 12–13 | 48.0% | — | 1,733 | 0 | 5 |
| 1985 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,940 | 0 | 11 | 1987 | 12–14 | 46.2% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 5 |
| 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,915 | 0 | 11 | 1988 | 6–14 | 30.0% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 5 |
| 1987 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,900 | 0 | 11 | 1989 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,626 | 0 | 5 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,621 | 0 | 5 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,638 | 0 | 5 |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Andrea Jaeger | Lisa Bonder Kreiss | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 1979 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 1980 | 25 | 4 | 29 | 86.2% | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% | 14 | 3 | 17 | 82.4% | 19 | 7 | 26 | 73.1% | 1982 | 9 | 3 | 12 | 75.0% | 19 | 7 | 26 | 73.1% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% |
| 1981 | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | 15 | 3 | 18 | 83.3% | 16 | 5 | 21 | 76.2% | 22 | 7 | 29 | 75.9% | 1983 | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% |
| 1982 | 17 | 6 | 23 | 73.9% | 15 | 5 | 20 | 75.0% | 11 | 4 | 15 | 73.3% | 22 | 6 | 28 | 78.6% | 1984 | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 15 | 6 | 21 | 71.4% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% |
| 1983 | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 23 | 5 | 28 | 82.1% | 9 | 2 | 11 | 81.8% | 12 | 9 | 21 | 57.1% | 1985 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% |
| 1984 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 1986 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 1985 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1987 | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% |
| 1986 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 33.3% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 1987 | — | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 65 | 21 | 86 | 75.6% | 66 | 21 | 87 | 75.9% | 50 | 14 | 64 | 78.1% | 80 | 34 | 114 | 70.2% | Career | 55 | 44 | 99 | 55.6% | 51 | 37 | 88 | 58.0% | 8 | 13 | 21 | 38.1% | 26 | 35 | 61 | 42.6% |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Andrea Jaeger | Lisa Bonder Kreiss | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 1979 | 1522 | 115.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50.0% | +0.75 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.21 | 1981 | 1604 | 125.7 | — | — | — | — | -15 | — | — | 58.1% | +0.77 | 1–2 (33%) | 3–1 (75%) | 101.3 | +0.04 |
| 1980 | 2157 | 165.9 | — | — | — | — | -8 | -425 | -301 | 74.7% | +1.98 | 9–3 (75%) | 6–1 (86%) | 114.0 | -6.95 | 1982 | 1768 | 139.6 | — | — | — | — | -113 | +67 | — | 61.1% | +0.97 | 9–2 (82%) | 3–4 (43%) | 108.6 | -1.35 |
| 1981 | 2182 | 174.7 | — | — | — | — | +39 | -160 | -157 | 70.3% | +1.78 | 15–5 (75%) | 4–6 (40%) | 106.7 | -9.51 | 1983 | 1885 | 141.9 | — | — | — | — | +6 | -142 | -283 | 55.0% | +0.38 | 7–6 (54%) | 5–2 (71%) | 104.1 | +1.97 |
| 1982 | 2203 | 174.6 | — | — | — | — | +59 | -31 | -141 | 73.9% | +1.87 | 12–2 (86%) | 7–2 (78%) | 109.9 | -8.79 | 1984 | 1866 | 149.1 | — | — | — | — | -23 | +31 | -236 | 60.9% | +0.95 | 7–8 (47%) | 3–6 (33%) | 96.1 | +1.43 |
| 1983 | 2105 | 170.2 | — | — | — | — | -3 | +149 | +46 | 70.7% | +1.71 | 7–4 (64%) | 4–4 (50%) | 96.1 | -4.08 | 1985 | 1797 | 146.3 | — | — | — | — | +41 | +44 | -194 | 41.9% | -0.55 | 10–7 (59%) | 3–6 (33%) | 101.4 | -1.77 |
| 1984 | 2025 | 144.9 | — | — | — | — | +15 | — | — | 65.5% | +1.52 | 0–1 | 0–2 | — | -0.43 | 1986 | 1734 | 125.4 | — | — | — | — | +15 | +69 | — | 54.5% | +0.16 | 3–6 (33%) | 3–1 (75%) | 96.8 | +0.68 |
| 1985 | 1940 | 112.8 | — | — | — | — | +12 | — | — | 47.6% | -0.76 | 1–2 (33%) | 0–2 | — | -0.48 | 1987 | 1704 | 131.8 | — | — | — | — | +26 | +55 | -105 | 48.2% | -0.21 | 1–3 (25%) | 0–2 | — | -0.94 |
| 1986 | 1915 | 98.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -2.33 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | -0.03 | 1988 | 1635 | 129.9 | — | — | — | — | +22 | +64 | — | 34.8% | -0.85 | 2–4 (33%) | 0–1 | — | -1.59 |
| 1987 | 1901 | 104.0 | — | — | — | — | — | +248 | — | 60.0% | +0.70 | 2–0 | — | — | +0.19 | 1989 | 1626 | 98.2 | — | — | — | — | +3 | — | — | 37.5% | -1.38 | 1–1 | — | — | +0.16 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 1621 | 109.4 | — | — | — | — | +3 | — | — | 42.9% | -0.71 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | -0.21 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 1638 | 118.4 | — | — | — | — | +9 | — | — | 50.0% | -0.10 | — | 1–0 | — | +0.13 |
| Career | 2266 | 172.3 | — | — | — | — | +22 | -43 | -157 | 71.0% | +1.71 | 46–18 (72%) | 22–18 (55%) | 109.1 | -8.61 | Career | 1929 | 145.2 | — | — | — | — | 0 | +15 | -216 | 52.6% | +0.24 | 41–40 (51%) | 21–24 (47%) | 99.3 | -0.52 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chris Evert | 5 | 17 | 22 | May 6, 1984 | H2H |
| Martina Navratilova | 4 | 11 | 15 | Jul 4, 1983 | H2H |
| Wendy Turnbull | 5 | 8 | 13 | Feb 4, 1984 | H2H |
| Sylvia Hanika | 10 | 2 | 12 | Jan 8, 1983 | H2H |
| Hana Mandlikova | 5 | 6 | 11 | Jan 14, 1984 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chris Evert | 1 | 8 | 9 | Jun 18, 1987 | H2H |
| Martina Navratilova | 0 | 6 | 6 | Sep 7, 1987 | H2H |
| Laura Arraya | 2 | 4 | 6 | Jul 23, 1985 | H2H |
| Pam Casale | 4 | 1 | 5 | Mar 9, 1988 | H2H |
| Michelle Torres | 2 | 3 | 5 | Sep 18, 1986 | H2H |