H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Andrea Jaeger vs Lisa Bonder Kreiss H2H: 1-2
Lisa Bonder Kreiss holds a 2–1 lead over Andrea Jaeger in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Lisa Bonder Kreiss leads 2–0 on carpet, while Andrea Jaeger leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lisa Bonder Kreiss won the 1984 Washington fourth round 6-0 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 61
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2, 1984 | Washington | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Lisa Bonder Kreiss | 6-0 6-1 | Andrea Jaeger | Match data |
| Sep 18, 1983* | Tokyo Queen's | WTA 250 | F | Carpet | Lisa Bonder Kreiss | 6-2 5-7 6-1 | Andrea Jaeger | Match data |
| May 1, 1982* | Orlando | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Andrea Jaeger | 6-1 6-2 | Lisa Bonder Kreiss | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrea Jaeger | #225 | #3 | — | 2,280 | 257 | 90 | 74.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
| Lisa Bonder Kreiss | — | — | — | 1,928 | 148 | 131 | 53.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Andrea Jaeger | Lisa Bonder Kreiss | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1979 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,522 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 9–6 | 60.0% | — | 1,603 | 0 | 1 |
| 1980 | 62–18 | 77.5% | — | 2,169 | 0 | 4 | 1982 | 28–15 | 65.1% | — | 1,769 | 0 | 3 |
| 1981 | 61–18 | 77.2% | — | 2,179 | 0 | 7 | 1983 | 26–19 | 57.8% | — | 1,885 | 0 | 5 |
| 1982 | 65–20 | 76.5% | — | 2,170 | 0 | 9 | 1984 | 31–19 | 62.0% | — | 1,865 | 0 | 5 |
| 1983 | 50–18 | 73.5% | — | 2,091 | 0 | 10 | 1985 | 17–22 | 43.6% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 5 |
| 1984 | 9–6 | 60.0% | #42 | 2,015 | 0 | 10 | 1986 | 12–13 | 48.0% | — | 1,734 | 0 | 5 |
| 1985 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,932 | 0 | 10 | 1987 | 12–14 | 46.2% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 5 |
| 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,907 | 0 | 10 | 1988 | 6–14 | 30.0% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 5 |
| 1987 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,882 | 0 | 10 | 1989 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,625 | 0 | 5 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,620 | 0 | 5 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,637 | 0 | 5 |