H2H data updated: 2026-10-27 00:00 UTC

Andrea Jaeger vs Tracy Austin H2H: 3-8 (incl. walkovers)

Andrea Jaeger vs Tracy Austin: 2–8 excluding walkovers; 3–8 including 1 walkover. Across 11 main-draw results including walkovers, Tracy Austin leads 3–1 on carpet, while they are tied 2–2 on hard courts. Most recently, Tracy Austin won the 1983 Charleston Open semifinal 7-5 7-5.

USA Age 61 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H including walkovers
3 – 8
11 main-draw results
USA Age 63 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tracy Austin 7-5 7-5 Andrea Jaeger Match data Apr 9, 1983* SF Charleston Open WTA 500 Clay
Andrea Jaeger 6-3 6-0 Tracy Austin Match data Feb 19, 1983* SF Chicago WTA 250 Carpet
Tracy Austin 6-4 6-4 Andrea Jaeger Match data Dec 19, 1982* QF East Rutherford WTA 250 Hard
Tracy Austin 6-3 6-4 Andrea Jaeger Match data Jun 21, 1981* F Eastbourne Open WTA 250 Grass
Tracy Austin 6-2 6-2 Andrea Jaeger Match data Jan 13, 1981* F Landover WTA 250 Carpet
Andrea Jaeger (w/o) Tracy Austin Match data Nov 16, 1980* F Tampa WTA 250 Hard
Tracy Austin 6-4 6-4 Andrea Jaeger Match data Nov 15, 1980* SF Porsche Tennis Grand Prix WTA 500 Carpet
Andrea Jaeger 2-6 6-4 6-4 Tracy Austin Match data Aug 23, 1980* QF Mahwah WTA 250 Hard
Tracy Austin 6-1 6-1 Andrea Jaeger Match data May 4, 1980* SF Orlando WTA 250 Clay
Tracy Austin 6-2 6-2 Andrea Jaeger Match data Feb 2, 1980* SF Seattle WTA 250 Carpet
Tracy Austin 6-2 6-2 Andrea Jaeger Match data Aug 31, 1979* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Andrea Jaeger — #3 — 2,265 262 91 74.2% 0 0 0 0 11 11
Tracy Austin — #1 19 2,522 341 88 79.5% 2 0 1 12 15 30

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andrea Jaeger Tracy Austin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1979 2–2 50.0% — 1,522 0 1 1977 14–8 63.6% — 1,780 0 1
15 1980 67–18 78.8% #7 2,156 0 5 1978 44–13 77.2% #6 2,087 0 3
16 1981 61–18 77.2% #4 2,181 0 8 1979 73–12 85.9% #3 2,436 1 10
17 1982 65–21 75.6% #3 2,202 0 10 1980 82–10 89.1% #2 2,463 1 21
18 1983 50–18 73.5% #3 2,105 0 11 1981 56–7 88.9% #2 2,449 2 29
19 1984 9–6 60.0% #42 2,025 0 11 1982 35–12 74.5% #4 2,267 2 30
20 1985 5–5 50.0% — 1,940 0 11 1983 24–8 75.0% #9 2,189 2 30
21 1986 0–1 0.0% — 1,915 0 11 1984 2–2 50.0% — 2,139 2 30
22 1987 3–2 60.0% — 1,900 0 11 — — — — — — —
26 — — — — — — — 1989 0–2 0.0% — 2,081 2 30
30 — — — — — — — 1993 6–6 50.0% #117 1,972 2 30
31 — — — — — — — 1994 5–8 38.5% — 1,852 2 30

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Andrea Jaeger Tracy Austin
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1979 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 4 2 6 66.7% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
15 1980 25 4 29 86.2% 9 4 13 69.2% 14 3 17 82.4% 19 7 26 73.1% 1978 16 5 21 76.2% 3 1 4 75.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 13 3 16 81.3%
16 1981 8 3 11 72.7% 15 3 18 83.3% 16 5 21 76.2% 22 7 29 75.9% 1979 22 4 26 84.6% 10 0 10 100.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 33 6 39 84.6%
17 1982 17 6 23 73.9% 15 5 20 75.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 22 6 28 78.6% 1980 19 4 23 82.6% 8 1 9 88.9% 11 1 12 91.7% 44 4 48 91.7%
18 1983 6 2 8 75.0% 23 5 28 82.1% 9 2 11 81.8% 12 9 21 57.1% 1981 22 0 22 100.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 12 2 14 85.7% 20 4 24 83.3%
19 1984 4 1 5 80.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 5 4 9 55.6% 1982 11 2 13 84.6% 3 1 4 75.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 15 6 21 71.4%
20 1985 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1983 — — — — 8 2 10 80.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 12 5 17 70.6%
21 1986 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 — — — — — — — — — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
22 1987 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 65 21 86 75.6% 66 21 87 75.9% 50 14 64 78.1% 80 34 114 70.2% — 102 26 128 79.7% 44 13 57 77.2% 49 14 63 77.8% 141 34 175 80.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Andrea Jaeger Tracy Austin
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1979 1522 115.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.75 — 0–1 — +0.21 1977 1781 150.1 — — — — -85 -31 — 59.1% +0.55 2–0 1–0 — -1.01
15 1980 2157 165.9 — — — — -8 -425 -301 74.7% +1.98 9–3 (75%) 6–1 (86%) 114.0 -6.95 1978 2087 165.9 — — — — -15 -282 -367 73.1% +2.01 6–3 (67%) 7–2 (78%) 108.9 -2.13
16 1981 2182 174.7 — — — — +39 -160 -157 70.3% +1.78 15–5 (75%) 4–6 (40%) 106.7 -9.51 1979 2436 178.9 — — — — +5 -373 -551 80.9% +2.33 13–3 (81%) 6–3 (67%) 110.9 -8.70
17 1982 2203 174.6 — — — — +59 -31 -141 73.9% +1.87 12–2 (86%) 7–2 (78%) 109.9 -8.79 1980 2464 180.2 — — — — +151 -327 -415 85.5% +3.11 12–3 (80%) 4–2 (67%) 104.3 -4.53
18 1983 2105 170.2 — — — — -3 +149 +46 70.7% +1.71 7–4 (64%) 4–4 (50%) 96.1 -4.08 1981 2450 175.9 — — — — +119 -339 -340 84.6% +2.88 7–3 (70%) 7–4 (64%) 101.5 -3.61
19 1984 2025 144.9 — — — — +15 — — 65.5% +1.52 0–1 0–2 — -0.43 1982 2267 167.2 — — — — +185 -147 -207 75.5% +2.05 4–6 (40%) 4–1 (80%) 94.0 -1.41
20 1985 1940 112.8 — — — — +12 — — 47.6% -0.76 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — -0.48 1983 2189 159.8 — — — — +140 -59 -83 76.5% +1.88 2–4 (33%) 4–1 (80%) 94.9 -1.86
21 1986 1915 98.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 1–0 — -0.03 1984 2140 115.0 — — — — +111 — — 50.0% +0.13 — — — +0.03
22 1987 1901 104.0 — — — — — +248 — 60.0% +0.70 2–0 — — +0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 2082 101.4 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 — — -0.05
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1973 123.4 — — — — +28 — — 46.4% -0.97 3–1 (75%) — — -0.65
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1852 118.5 — — — — +78 +126 — 36.7% -0.97 3–1 (75%) 0–1 — -1.54
Career — 2266 172.3 — — — — +22 -43 -157 71.0% +1.71 46–18 (72%) 22–18 (55%) 109.1 -8.61 — 2522 175.8 — — — — +83 -173 -353 76.3% +2.13 52–25 (68%) 33–14 (70%) 108.9 -5.99

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.