H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Andrea Jaeger vs Zina Garrison H2H: 3-1

Andrea Jaeger holds a 3–1 lead over Zina Garrison in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Andrea Jaeger leads 2–0 on clay, while Zina Garrison leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Andrea Jaeger won the 1983 Palm Beach quarterfinal 6-1 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Andrea Jaeger
USA Age 61 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Zina Garrison
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 4, 1983* Palm Beach WTA 250 QF Clay Andrea Jaeger 6-1 6-1 Zina Garrison Match data
Jan 13, 1983* Houston WTA 250 R32 Carpet Zina Garrison 6-1 6-3 Andrea Jaeger Match data
Oct 16, 1982* Tampa WTA 250 QF Hard Andrea Jaeger 6-3 6-3 Zina Garrison Match data
Apr 10, 1982* Hilton Head WTA 250 QF Clay Andrea Jaeger 6-2 6-1 Zina Garrison Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Andrea Jaeger #225 #3 — 2,280 257 90 74.1% 0 0 0 0 10 10
Zina Garrison #318 #4 134 2,142 581 268 68.4% 0 0 0 1 14 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andrea Jaeger Zina Garrison
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1979 2–2 50.0% — 1,522 0 1 — — — — — — —
15 1980 62–18 77.5% — 2,169 0 4 — — — — — — —
16 1981 61–18 77.2% — 2,179 0 7 1980 2–2 50.0% — 1,529 0 1
17 1982 65–20 76.5% — 2,170 0 9 1981 5–5 50.0% — 1,568 0 1
18 1983 50–18 73.5% — 2,091 0 10 1982 23–15 60.5% — 1,853 0 1
19 1984 9–6 60.0% #42 2,015 0 10 1983 38–18 67.9% — 1,989 0 1
20 1985 5–5 50.0% — 1,932 0 10 1984 47–20 70.1% #9 2,012 0 2
21 1986 0–1 0.0% #225 1,907 0 10 1985 51–18 73.9% #8 2,032 0 4
22 1987 3–2 60.0% — 1,882 0 10 1986 48–22 68.6% #11 1,999 0 5
23 — — — — — — — 1987 44–17 72.1% #9 1,987 0 7
24 — — — — — — — 1988 49–20 71.0% #9 2,021 0 7
25 — — — — — — — 1989 60–15 80.0% #4 2,130 0 10
26 — — — — — — — 1990 48–18 72.7% #10 2,039 0 11
27 — — — — — — — 1991 37–18 67.3% #12 1,963 0 11
28 — — — — — — — 1992 36–19 65.5% #18 1,924 0 12
29 — — — — — — — 1993 43–19 69.4% #14 1,995 0 14
30 — — — — — — — 1994 24–16 60.0% #24 1,889 0 14
31 — — — — — — — 1995 25–16 61.0% #22 1,868 0 15
32 — — — — — — — 1996 1–10 9.1% #273 1,704 0 15