H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Andrea Jaeger vs Zina Garrison H2H: 3-1

Andrea Jaeger holds a 3–1 lead over Zina Garrison in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Andrea Jaeger leads 2–0 on clay, while Zina Garrison leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Andrea Jaeger won the 1983 Palm Beach quarterfinal 6-1 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Andrea Jaeger
USA Age 61 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main-draw meetings
Zina Garrison
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Andrea Jaeger 6-1 6-1 Zina Garrison Match data Feb 4, 1983* QF Palm Beach WTA 250 Clay
Zina Garrison 6-1 6-3 Andrea Jaeger Match data Jan 13, 1983* R32 Houston WTA 250 Carpet
Andrea Jaeger 6-3 6-3 Zina Garrison Match data Oct 16, 1982* QF Tampa WTA 250 Hard
Andrea Jaeger 6-2 6-1 Zina Garrison Match data Apr 10, 1982* QF Charleston Open WTA 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Andrea Jaeger — #3 — 2,265 262 91 74.2% 0 0 0 0 11 11
Zina Garrison — #4 134 2,146 584 270 68.4% 0 0 0 2 13 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andrea Jaeger Zina Garrison
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1979 2–2 50.0% — 1,522 0 1 — — — — — — —
15 1980 67–18 78.8% #7 2,156 0 5 — — — — — — —
16 1981 61–18 77.2% #4 2,181 0 8 1980 2–2 50.0% — 1,529 0 1
17 1982 65–21 75.6% #3 2,202 0 10 1981 5–5 50.0% — 1,569 0 1
18 1983 50–18 73.5% #3 2,105 0 11 1982 23–15 60.5% — 1,854 0 1
19 1984 9–6 60.0% #42 2,025 0 11 1983 38–18 67.9% #10 1,991 0 1
20 1985 5–5 50.0% — 1,940 0 11 1984 47–20 70.1% #9 2,013 0 2
21 1986 0–1 0.0% — 1,915 0 11 1985 51–18 73.9% #8 2,033 0 4
22 1987 3–2 60.0% — 1,900 0 11 1986 48–22 68.6% #11 2,000 0 5
23 — — — — — — — 1987 44–17 72.1% #9 1,988 0 7
24 — — — — — — — 1988 52–21 71.2% #9 2,043 0 7
25 — — — — — — — 1989 60–15 80.0% #4 2,135 0 10
26 — — — — — — — 1990 48–18 72.7% #10 2,041 0 11
27 — — — — — — — 1991 37–18 67.3% #12 1,964 0 11
28 — — — — — — — 1992 36–20 64.3% #18 1,915 0 12
29 — — — — — — — 1993 43–19 69.4% #14 1,995 0 14
30 — — — — — — — 1994 24–16 60.0% #24 1,889 0 14
31 — — — — — — — 1995 25–16 61.0% #22 1,868 0 15
32 — — — — — — — 1996 1–10 9.1% #273 1,711 0 15

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Andrea Jaeger Zina Garrison
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1979 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1980 25 4 29 86.2% 9 4 13 69.2% 14 3 17 82.4% 19 7 26 73.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1981 8 3 11 72.7% 15 3 18 83.3% 16 5 21 76.2% 22 7 29 75.9% 1980 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
17 1982 17 6 23 73.9% 15 5 20 75.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 22 6 28 78.6% 1981 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 3 3 6 50.0%
18 1983 6 2 8 75.0% 23 5 28 82.1% 9 2 11 81.8% 12 9 21 57.1% 1982 5 4 9 55.6% 7 3 10 70.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 0 3 3 0.0%
19 1984 4 1 5 80.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 5 4 9 55.6% 1983 6 2 8 75.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 13 5 18 72.2% 8 5 13 61.5%
20 1985 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 11 3 14 78.6% 15 6 21 71.4% 6 5 11 54.5% 15 6 21 71.4%
21 1986 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 14 3 17 82.4% 12 4 16 75.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 14 7 21 66.7%
22 1987 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 1986 21 5 26 80.8% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 16 10 26 61.5%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 15 5 20 75.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 8 1 9 88.9% 13 7 20 65.0%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 28 10 38 73.7% 13 6 19 68.4% 9 3 12 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 30 6 36 83.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 12 3 15 80.0% 15 4 19 78.9%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 18 6 24 75.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 12 2 14 85.7% 12 6 18 66.7%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 18 8 26 69.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 10 5 15 66.7%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 18 6 24 75.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 8 7 15 53.3%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 22 8 30 73.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 12 5 17 70.6%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 12 7 19 63.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 7 6 13 53.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 8 4 12 66.7%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0%
Career — 65 21 86 75.6% 66 21 87 75.9% 50 14 64 78.1% 80 34 114 70.2% — 225 86 311 72.3% 90 58 148 60.8% 123 41 164 75.0% 142 83 225 63.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Andrea Jaeger Zina Garrison
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1979 1522 115.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.75 — 0–1 — +0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1980 2157 165.9 — — — — -8 -425 -301 74.7% +1.98 9–3 (75%) 6–1 (86%) 114.0 -6.95 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1981 2182 174.7 — — — — +39 -160 -157 70.3% +1.78 15–5 (75%) 4–6 (40%) 106.7 -9.51 1980 1530 117.5 — — — — +50 — — 55.6% +0.56 0–1 — — +0.24
17 1982 2203 174.6 — — — — +59 -31 -141 73.9% +1.87 12–2 (86%) 7–2 (78%) 109.9 -8.79 1981 1570 122.6 — — — — +75 — — 54.5% +0.55 2–2 (50%) — — +1.07
18 1983 2105 170.2 — — — — -3 +149 +46 70.7% +1.71 7–4 (64%) 4–4 (50%) 96.1 -4.08 1982 1854 155.2 — — — — -184 -169 -50 57.5% +0.46 7–4 (64%) 4–3 (57%) 108.3 -4.44
19 1984 2025 144.9 — — — — +15 — — 65.5% +1.52 0–1 0–2 — -0.43 1983 1992 154.7 — — — — -125 -109 -51 65.0% +0.87 7–2 (78%) 7–6 (54%) 108.1 -2.42
20 1985 1940 112.8 — — — — +12 — — 47.6% -0.76 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — -0.48 1984 2014 157.4 — — — — +14 -97 -60 65.1% +1.21 12–7 (63%) 7–2 (78%) 105.1 -0.88
21 1986 1915 98.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 1–0 — -0.03 1985 2034 160.3 — — — — +48 -57 -43 67.7% +1.56 15–5 (75%) 4–11 (27%) 96.5 +0.81
22 1987 1901 104.0 — — — — — +248 — 60.0% +0.70 2–0 — — +0.19 1986 2001 159.4 — — — — +95 -126 -22 66.0% +1.22 10–7 (59%) 8–6 (57%) 98.3 -1.14
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1989 166.9 — — — — +36 -61 +137 69.6% +1.50 7–6 (54%) 6–4 (60%) 100.4 -2.84
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 2044 162.1 — — — — +19 -90 +74 68.1% +1.43 9–7 (56%) 7–3 (70%) 101.1 -4.42
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 2136 170.0 — — — — +58 -213 -22 76.4% +2.14 8–7 (53%) 10–3 (77%) 101.5 -0.27
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 2042 161.7 — — — — +13 -145 +212 68.5% +1.50 11–10 (52%) 4–5 (44%) 95.8 -1.68
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1964 154.0 — — — — +29 -134 +240 63.1% +0.89 9–5 (64%) 3–3 (50%) 98.7 +1.03
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1915 157.8 — — — — +40 -53 +313 62.5% +0.84 9–7 (56%) 5–3 (63%) 97.2 +0.17
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1996 160.6 — — — — +23 -216 +200 67.4% +1.23 8–7 (53%) 8–4 (67%) 100.2 +0.21
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1889 145.4 — — — — +24 -186 +260 54.3% +0.13 10–4 (71%) 7–2 (78%) 102.6 -0.25
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1869 147.9 — — — — +28 -240 +310 61.2% +0.83 6–10 (38%) 5–3 (63%) 91.6 +1.45
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1712 111.9 — — — — +24 — — 20.8% -1.50 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — +0.20
Career — 2266 172.3 — — — — +22 -43 -157 71.0% +1.71 46–18 (72%) 22–18 (55%) 109.1 -8.61 — 2147 164.7 — — — — +27 -112 +90 65.2% +1.16 131–94 (58%) 86–59 (59%) 101.4 -1.54

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.