H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Andrea Leand vs Ann Grossman H2H: 0-1
Ann Grossman holds a 1–0 lead over Andrea Leand in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ann Grossman leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ann Grossman won the 1989 Oklahoma third round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 55
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 1989* | Oklahoma | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Ann Grossman | 6-3 6-3 | Andrea Leand | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrea Leand | #857 | #27 | 13 | 1,883 | 83 | 104 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Ann Grossman | #343 | #29 | 384 | 1,888 | 187 | 185 | 50.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrea Leand | Ann Grossman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #378 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1981 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #48 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1982 | 29–22 | 56.9% | — | 1,814 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #54 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1983 | 17–18 | 48.6% | — | 1,786 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #50 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1984 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #35 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #89 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1985 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #33 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #36 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1986 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #35 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #37 | 1,853 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #296 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #88 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1989 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #152 | 1,580 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #72 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1990 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #142 | 1,517 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #75 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1991 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #180 | 1,505 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #283 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #341 | 1,474 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #461 | 1,473 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |