H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Andrea Leand vs Ann Grossman H2H: 0-1

Ann Grossman holds a 1–0 lead over Andrea Leand in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ann Grossman leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ann Grossman won the 1989 Oklahoma round of 32 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Andrea Leand
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Ann Grossman
USA Age 55 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ann Grossman #55 6-3 6-3 Andrea Leand #180 Match data Mar 2, 1989* R32 Oklahoma WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Andrea Leand #857 #27 13 1,881 83 104 44.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Ann Grossman #343 #29 384 1,887 187 185 50.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andrea Leand Ann Grossman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1987 0–1 0.0% #378 1,497 0 0
17 1981 4–3 57.1% — 1,563 0 0 1988 15–12 55.6% #48 1,699 0 0
18 1982 29–22 56.9% — 1,812 0 0 1989 23–20 53.5% #54 1,736 0 0
19 1983 17–18 48.6% — 1,784 0 0 1990 23–22 51.1% #50 1,748 0 0
20 1984 19–18 51.4% #35 1,774 0 1 1991 12–19 38.7% #89 1,638 0 0
21 1985 1–5 16.7% #33 1,681 0 1 1992 23–17 57.5% #36 1,733 0 0
22 1986 0–3 0.0% #214 1,627 0 1 1993 30–19 61.2% #35 1,804 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 1994 27–21 56.2% #37 1,853 0 0
24 1988 0–1 0.0% #296 1,607 0 1 1995 12–19 38.7% #88 1,681 0 0
25 1989 3–7 30.0% #152 1,579 0 1 1996 10–14 41.7% #72 1,665 0 0
26 1990 6–15 28.6% #142 1,516 0 1 1997 10–17 37.0% #75 1,615 0 0
27 1991 4–9 30.8% #180 1,504 0 1 1998 2–4 33.3% #283 1,595 0 0
29 1993 0–2 0.0% #341 1,473 0 1 — — — — — — —
30 1994 0–1 0.0% #461 1,472 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Andrea Leand Ann Grossman
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1981 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1988 13 11 24 54.2% — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
18 1982 10 4 14 71.4% 7 4 11 63.6% 3 5 8 37.5% 9 8 17 52.9% 1989 16 11 27 59.3% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1983 7 3 10 70.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 6 8 25.0% 1990 9 12 21 42.9% 12 7 19 63.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
20 1984 8 7 15 53.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1991 4 11 15 26.7% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1985 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1992 15 8 23 65.2% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0%
22 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1993 21 12 33 63.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 16 10 26 61.5% 9 7 16 56.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0%
24 1988 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 5 10 15 33.3% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
25 1989 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1996 8 9 17 47.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 1990 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 1997 3 9 12 25.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 1991 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1998 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
29 1993 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1994 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 37 36 73 50.7% 16 19 35 45.7% 10 18 28 35.7% 20 30 50 40.0% — 111 106 217 51.2% 59 56 115 51.3% 6 9 15 40.0% 11 14 25 44.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Andrea Leand Ann Grossman
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1497 101.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.15
17 1981 1564 118.3 — — — — +112 — — 55.6% 0.00 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — +0.64 1988 1699 133.9 — — — — +28 — — 54.1% +0.13 4–3 (57%) 0–5 (0%) 100.1 +0.16
18 1982 1813 151.1 — — — — +80 -158 -211 58.6% +0.34 6–10 (38%) 7–4 (64%) 102.1 -2.70 1989 1737 136.2 — — — — +43 -89 — 52.5% +0.05 8–7 (53%) 4–5 (44%) 101.2 -1.22
19 1983 1785 132.5 — — — — +54 -45 -182 48.8% -0.18 7–7 (50%) 2–5 (29%) 99.5 -1.64 1990 1749 136.3 — — — — -12 +8 — 51.0% +0.02 7–7 (50%) 2–4 (33%) — -1.48
20 1984 1775 142.9 — — — — +39 -6 -186 53.3% +0.21 6–10 (38%) 2–5 (29%) 91.3 -0.75 1991 1638 126.7 — — — — -16 +89 — 44.3% +0.06 3–7 (30%) 2–6 (25%) 91.9 +0.49
21 1985 1681 93.6 — — — — — — — 16.7% -2.92 — — — +0.61 1992 1733 132.9 — — — — +24 -9 — 52.9% -0.03 6–3 (67%) 6–1 (86%) 108.7 +1.73
22 1986 1628 92.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.83 — 0–1 — +0.24 1993 1805 140.5 — — — — +9 -60 — 59.6% +0.62 6–7 (46%) 6–3 (67%) 103.6 +0.77
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1853 146.2 — — — — 0 -73 -249 53.6% -0.01 10–6 (63%) 5–2 (71%) 107.3 -1.02
24 1988 1608 97.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.14 1995 1681 123.7 — — — — +38 +44 — 40.8% -0.46 4–5 (44%) 3–9 (25%) 92.7 +0.33
25 1989 1579 123.9 — — — — +89 — — 34.8% -1.13 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 98.0 +0.47 1996 1666 130.2 — — — — +49 +8 — 42.9% -0.62 4–4 (50%) 0–2 — -0.99
26 1990 1517 111.0 — — — — +34 — +59 29.2% -1.79 4–2 (67%) 1–1 — +0.82 1997 1615 123.7 — — — — +26 +98 — 38.6% -1.25 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 97.1 -0.41
27 1991 1505 113.3 — — — — +4 — — 34.6% -1.46 3–1 (75%) 1–0 — +0.52 1998 1595 103.2 — — — — +41 +76 — 33.3% -1.58 — 1–0 — +0.11
29 1993 1474 94.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.25 — — — +0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1994 1472 108.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1882 138.5 — — — — +56 -85 -134 46.4% -0.44 29–34 (46%) 15–19 (44%) 98.3 -0.85 — 1888 140.3 — — — — +18 +6 -249 49.9% -0.10 53–53 (50%) 31–39 (44%) 99.5 -0.45

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.