H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Andrea Leand vs Catarina Lindqvist Ryan H2H: 0-1
Catarina Lindqvist Ryan holds a 1–0 lead over Andrea Leand in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Catarina Lindqvist Ryan leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Catarina Lindqvist Ryan won the 1984 Tokyo Pan Pacific third round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 1984* | Tokyo Pan Pacific | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | 6-1 6-4 | Andrea Leand | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrea Leand | #857 | #27 | 13 | 1,883 | 83 | 104 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | — | — | — | 1,989 | 259 | 190 | 57.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Andrea Leand | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1981 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 29–22 | 56.9% | — | 1,814 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 17–18 | 48.6% | — | 1,786 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #35 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #33 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 28–16 | 63.6% | — | 1,790 | 0 | 2 |
| 1986 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 44–18 | 71.0% | — | 1,974 | 0 | 3 |
| 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #296 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,881 | 0 | 3 |
| 1989 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #152 | 1,580 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 34–20 | 63.0% | — | 1,874 | 0 | 3 |
| 1990 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #142 | 1,517 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 27–22 | 55.1% | — | 1,798 | 0 | 3 |
| 1991 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #180 | 1,505 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 29–19 | 60.4% | — | 1,785 | 0 | 3 |
| 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #341 | 1,474 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 19–16 | 54.3% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 4 |
| 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #461 | 1,473 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 25–22 | 53.2% | — | 1,716 | 0 | 5 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 14–15 | 48.3% | — | 1,658 | 0 | 5 |