Andrea Leand
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eva Pfaff | 4 | 1 | 5 | May 1, 1991 | H2H |
| Martina Navratilova | 0 | 5 | 5 | Nov 3, 1989 | H2H |
| Chris Evert | 0 | 5 | 5 | Feb 4, 1989 | H2H |
| Liz Smylie | 1 | 3 | 4 | Nov 8, 1990 | H2H |
| Hana Mandlikova | 0 | 4 | 4 | Aug 25, 1989 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC
Andrea Leand vs Donna Faber H2H: 0-1
Donna Faber holds a 1–0 lead over Andrea Leand in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Donna Faber leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Donna Faber won the 1990 Australian Open round of 64 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Donna Faber | 6-1 6-3 | Andrea Leand | Match data | Jan 19, 1990* | R64 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrea Leand | #857 | #27 | 13 | 1,881 | 83 | 104 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Donna Faber | #227 | #55 | 19 | 1,718 | 68 | 97 | 41.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrea Leand | Donna Faber | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #218 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #131 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1981 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1982 | 29–22 | 56.9% | — | 1,812 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #84 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1983 | 17–18 | 48.6% | — | 1,784 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #99 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1984 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #35 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #116 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1985 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #33 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #227 | 1,431 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1986 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #296 | 1,607 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1989 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #152 | 1,579 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1990 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #142 | 1,516 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1991 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #180 | 1,504 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #341 | 1,473 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #461 | 1,472 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Andrea Leand | Donna Faber | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1981 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 15 | 10 | 25 | 60.0% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 18 | 1982 | 10 | 4 | 14 | 71.4% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | 1990 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 19 | 1983 | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 1991 | 9 | 11 | 20 | 45.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 20 | 1984 | 8 | 7 | 15 | 53.3% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 1992 | 8 | 12 | 20 | 40.0% | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1985 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 22 | 1986 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1988 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1989 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1990 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1991 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1993 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1994 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 37 | 36 | 73 | 50.7% | 16 | 19 | 35 | 45.7% | 10 | 18 | 28 | 35.7% | 20 | 30 | 50 | 40.0% | — | 42 | 53 | 95 | 44.2% | 19 | 29 | 48 | 39.6% | 6 | 10 | 16 | 37.5% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Andrea Leand | Donna Faber | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 1496 | 103.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -0.17 | — | — | — | +0.11 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1532 | 112.2 | — | — | — | — | +4 | +14 | — | 40.6% | -0.63 | 1–1 | 1–1 | — | +0.30 |
| 17 | 1981 | 1564 | 118.3 | — | — | — | — | +112 | — | — | 55.6% | 0.00 | 2–2 (50%) | 1–1 | — | +0.64 | 1989 | 1675 | 137.0 | — | — | — | — | +40 | -169 | -99 | 48.9% | +0.16 | 7–7 (50%) | 2–4 (33%) | 100.4 | +1.23 |
| 18 | 1982 | 1813 | 151.1 | — | — | — | — | +80 | -158 | -211 | 58.6% | +0.34 | 6–10 (38%) | 7–4 (64%) | 102.1 | -2.70 | 1990 | 1631 | 115.4 | — | — | — | — | -7 | -19 | -43 | 43.1% | -0.68 | 5–1 (83%) | 2–1 (67%) | — | +0.90 |
| 19 | 1983 | 1785 | 132.5 | — | — | — | — | +54 | -45 | -182 | 48.8% | -0.18 | 7–7 (50%) | 2–5 (29%) | 99.5 | -1.64 | 1991 | 1593 | 109.9 | — | — | — | — | -20 | +38 | +10 | 41.3% | -0.77 | 9–3 (75%) | 4–5 (44%) | 106.2 | +1.62 |
| 20 | 1984 | 1775 | 142.9 | — | — | — | — | +39 | -6 | -186 | 53.3% | +0.21 | 6–10 (38%) | 2–5 (29%) | 91.3 | -0.75 | 1992 | 1542 | 119.9 | — | — | — | — | +26 | +37 | — | 38.0% | -0.77 | 4–5 (44%) | 1–4 (20%) | 97.6 | +0.56 |
| 21 | 1985 | 1681 | 93.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 16.7% | -2.92 | — | — | — | +0.61 | 1993 | 1432 | 94.2 | — | — | — | — | +34 | — | — | 20.0% | -2.12 | 0–3 (0%) | 3–2 (60%) | 97.5 | +0.77 |
| 22 | 1986 | 1628 | 92.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.83 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1988 | 1608 | 97.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | +0.14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1989 | 1579 | 123.9 | — | — | — | — | +89 | — | — | 34.8% | -1.13 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–2 (33%) | 98.0 | +0.47 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1990 | 1517 | 111.0 | — | — | — | — | +34 | — | +59 | 29.2% | -1.79 | 4–2 (67%) | 1–1 | — | +0.82 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1991 | 1505 | 113.3 | — | — | — | — | +4 | — | — | 34.6% | -1.46 | 3–1 (75%) | 1–0 | — | +0.52 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1993 | 1474 | 94.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.25 | — | — | — | +0.38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1994 | 1472 | 108.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.50 | — | — | — | -0.32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1882 | 138.5 | — | — | — | — | +56 | -85 | -134 | 46.4% | -0.44 | 29–34 (46%) | 15–19 (44%) | 98.3 | -0.85 | — | 1719 | 121.4 | — | — | — | — | +14 | -11 | -44 | 41.2% | -0.60 | 26–20 (57%) | 13–17 (43%) | 103.5 | +3.33 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Donna Faber
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Katerina Maleeva | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jan 20, 1991 | H2H |
| Angelica Gavaldon | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jul 29, 1993 | H2H |
| Louise Field | 1 | 2 | 3 | Mar 13, 1993 | H2H |
| Jenny Byrne | 2 | 1 | 3 | Sep 28, 1992 | H2H |
| Gigi Fernandez | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jun 24, 1992 | H2H |