H2H data updated: 2026-10-24 00:00 UTC

Andrea Leand vs Etsuko Inoue H2H: 1-1

Andrea Leand and Etsuko Inoue are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Andrea Leand leads 1–0 on carpet, while Etsuko Inoue leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Etsuko Inoue won the 1990 Birmingham round of 64 6-2 6-2.

USA Age 62 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
JPN Age 62 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Etsuko Inoue #59 6-2 6-2 Andrea Leand #124 Match data Jun 13, 1990* R64 Birmingham Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass
Andrea Leand #51 6-4 6-4 Etsuko Inoue #76 Match data Jan 28, 1984* QF Pittsburgh WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Andrea Leand #857 #27 13 1,882 83 104 44.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Etsuko Inoue #310 #26 27 1,803 120 133 47.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andrea Leand Etsuko Inoue
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,487 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1981 0–1 0.0% — 1,483 0 0
17 1981 4–3 57.1% — 1,563 0 0 1982 3–2 60.0% — 1,523 0 0
18 1982 29–22 56.9% — 1,813 0 0 1983 17–15 53.1% — 1,641 0 1
19 1983 17–18 48.6% — 1,785 0 0 1984 19–19 50.0% #68 1,700 0 2
20 1984 19–18 51.4% #35 1,775 0 1 1985 13–21 38.2% #70 1,633 0 2
21 1985 1–5 16.7% #33 1,681 0 1 1986 9–14 39.1% #80 1,636 0 2
22 1986 0–3 0.0% #214 1,628 0 1 1987 20–15 57.1% #30 1,765 0 2
23 — — — — — — — 1988 11–14 44.0% #52 1,703 0 2
24 1988 0–1 0.0% #296 1,607 0 1 1989 15–18 45.5% #68 1,669 0 2
25 1989 3–7 30.0% #152 1,579 0 1 1990 13–13 50.0% #70 1,661 0 2
26 1990 6–15 28.6% #142 1,516 0 1 — — — — — — —
27 1991 4–9 30.8% #180 1,504 0 1 — — — — — — —
29 1993 0–2 0.0% #341 1,473 0 1 — — — — — — —
30 1994 0–1 0.0% #461 1,472 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Andrea Leand Etsuko Inoue
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1981 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1982 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1982 10 4 14 71.4% 7 4 11 63.6% 3 5 8 37.5% 9 8 17 52.9% 1983 5 5 10 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — —
19 1983 7 3 10 70.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 6 8 25.0% 1984 9 7 16 56.3% 6 7 13 46.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
20 1984 8 7 15 53.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1985 5 9 14 35.7% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0%
21 1985 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1986 3 7 10 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
22 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1987 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 9 6 15 60.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 4 8 12 33.3% — — — — 5 5 10 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
24 1988 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 11 14 25 44.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1989 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1990 10 9 19 52.6% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 1990 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1991 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1993 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1994 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 37 36 73 50.7% 16 19 35 45.7% 10 18 28 35.7% 20 30 50 40.0% — 57 67 124 46.0% 14 18 32 43.8% 35 34 69 50.7% 9 13 22 40.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Andrea Leand Etsuko Inoue
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1488 97.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.10
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1484 100.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — -0.02
17 1981 1564 118.6 — — — — +112 — — 55.6% 0.00 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — +0.63 1982 1523 98.6 — — — — +58 — — 54.5% +0.09 1–0 0–1 — +0.31
18 1982 1814 151.3 — — — — +79 -159 -211 58.6% +0.34 6–10 (38%) 7–4 (64%) 102.1 -0.79 1983 1642 120.2 — — — — +6 -37 -81 52.9% +0.06 2–2 (50%) 2–0 — +1.52
19 1983 1786 132.7 — — — — +54 -46 -183 48.8% -0.18 7–7 (50%) 2–5 (29%) 99.5 -1.54 1984 1700 134.4 — — — — -8 -31 -113 50.6% +0.12 5–6 (45%) 3–5 (38%) 98.1 -0.03
20 1984 1776 143.1 — — — — +40 -6 -187 53.3% +0.21 6–10 (38%) 2–5 (29%) 91.3 -0.56 1985 1634 117.7 — — — — -18 +11 -72 41.3% -0.66 5–7 (42%) 2–2 (50%) 96.4 +0.45
21 1985 1681 93.5 — — — — — — — 16.7% -2.92 — — — +0.63 1986 1636 124.6 — — — — -96 — +70 42.6% -0.57 3–5 (38%) 3–3 (50%) 100.2 -0.59
22 1986 1628 92.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.83 — 0–1 — +0.13 1987 1765 138.1 — — — — -110 — +24 59.0% +0.54 4–9 (31%) 3–1 (75%) 97.8 +0.01
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1703 132.9 — — — — -74 — +78 48.4% -0.06 4–8 (33%) 5–2 (71%) 97.7 -1.02
24 1988 1608 97.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.14 1989 1670 137.7 — — — — -24 — +88 47.4% -0.14 4–8 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 96.6 -0.53
25 1989 1579 124.0 — — — — +90 — — 34.8% -1.13 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 98.0 +0.55 1990 1661 128.6 — — — — +24 — +100 49.2% -0.24 4–3 (57%) 5–1 (83%) 104.2 -0.07
26 1990 1517 111.0 — — — — +34 — +59 29.2% -1.79 4–2 (67%) 1–1 — +0.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1991 1505 113.4 — — — — +4 — — 34.6% -1.46 3–1 (75%) 1–0 — +0.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1993 1474 94.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.25 — — — +0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1994 1473 108.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1883 138.7 — — — — +56 -86 -135 46.4% -0.44 29–34 (46%) 15–19 (44%) 98.3 +0.32 — 1804 134.8 — — — — -32 -20 +14 49.1% -0.11 32–49 (40%) 25–17 (60%) 99.0 -0.03

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.