H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Andrea Leand vs Etsuko Inoue H2H: 1-1
Andrea Leand and Etsuko Inoue are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Andrea Leand leads 1–0 on carpet, while Etsuko Inoue leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Etsuko Inoue won the 1990 Birmingham second round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 61
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 1990* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Etsuko Inoue | 6-2 6-2 | Andrea Leand | Match data |
| Jan 28, 1984* | Pittsburgh | WTA 250 | QF | Carpet | Andrea Leand | 6-4 6-4 | Etsuko Inoue | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrea Leand | #857 | #27 | 13 | 1,883 | 83 | 104 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Etsuko Inoue | #310 | #26 | 27 | 1,803 | 120 | 132 | 47.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrea Leand | Etsuko Inoue | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1981 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1982 | 29–22 | 56.9% | — | 1,814 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 17–15 | 53.1% | — | 1,642 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1983 | 17–18 | 48.6% | — | 1,786 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #68 | 1,700 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1984 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #35 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #70 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1985 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #33 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #80 | 1,636 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1986 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #30 | 1,765 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #52 | 1,729 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #296 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #68 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1989 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #152 | 1,580 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,665 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1990 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #142 | 1,517 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1991 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #180 | 1,505 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #341 | 1,474 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #461 | 1,473 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |