Andrea Leand
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eva Pfaff | 4 | 1 | 5 | May 1, 1991 | H2H |
| Martina Navratilova | 0 | 5 | 5 | Nov 3, 1989 | H2H |
| Chris Evert | 0 | 5 | 5 | Feb 4, 1989 | H2H |
| Liz Smylie | 1 | 3 | 4 | Nov 8, 1990 | H2H |
| Hana Mandlikova | 0 | 4 | 4 | Aug 25, 1989 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-10-24 00:00 UTC
Andrea Leand and Etsuko Inoue are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Andrea Leand leads 1–0 on carpet, while Etsuko Inoue leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Etsuko Inoue won the 1990 Birmingham round of 64 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Etsuko Inoue | 6-2 6-2 | Andrea Leand | Match data | Jun 13, 1990* | R64 | Birmingham | Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Grass |
| Andrea Leand | 6-4 6-4 | Etsuko Inoue | Match data | Jan 28, 1984* | QF | Pittsburgh | WTA 250 | Carpet |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrea Leand | #857 | #27 | 13 | 1,882 | 83 | 104 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Etsuko Inoue | #310 | #26 | 27 | 1,803 | 120 | 133 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrea Leand | Etsuko Inoue | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1981 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1982 | 29–22 | 56.9% | — | 1,813 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 17–15 | 53.1% | — | 1,641 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1983 | 17–18 | 48.6% | — | 1,785 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #68 | 1,700 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1984 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #35 | 1,775 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #70 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1985 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #33 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #80 | 1,636 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1986 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #30 | 1,765 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #52 | 1,703 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #296 | 1,607 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #68 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1989 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #152 | 1,579 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,661 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1990 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #142 | 1,516 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1991 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #180 | 1,504 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #341 | 1,473 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #461 | 1,472 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Andrea Leand | Etsuko Inoue | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 17 | 1981 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1982 | 10 | 4 | 14 | 71.4% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | 1983 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1983 | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 1984 | 9 | 7 | 16 | 56.3% | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 20 | 1984 | 8 | 7 | 15 | 53.3% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 1985 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 21 | 1985 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 22 | 1986 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | — | — | — | — | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 24 | 1988 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 11 | 14 | 25 | 44.0% | — | — | — | — | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 25 | 1989 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1990 | 10 | 9 | 19 | 52.6% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 26 | 1990 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1991 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1993 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1994 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 37 | 36 | 73 | 50.7% | 16 | 19 | 35 | 45.7% | 10 | 18 | 28 | 35.7% | 20 | 30 | 50 | 40.0% | — | 57 | 67 | 124 | 46.0% | 14 | 18 | 32 | 43.8% | 35 | 34 | 69 | 50.7% | 9 | 13 | 22 | 40.9% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Andrea Leand | Etsuko Inoue | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 1488 | 97.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | -0.10 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 1484 | 100.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.33 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.02 |
| 17 | 1981 | 1564 | 118.6 | — | — | — | — | +112 | — | — | 55.6% | 0.00 | 2–2 (50%) | 1–1 | — | +0.63 | 1982 | 1523 | 98.6 | — | — | — | — | +58 | — | — | 54.5% | +0.09 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | +0.31 |
| 18 | 1982 | 1814 | 151.3 | — | — | — | — | +79 | -159 | -211 | 58.6% | +0.34 | 6–10 (38%) | 7–4 (64%) | 102.1 | -0.79 | 1983 | 1642 | 120.2 | — | — | — | — | +6 | -37 | -81 | 52.9% | +0.06 | 2–2 (50%) | 2–0 | — | +1.52 |
| 19 | 1983 | 1786 | 132.7 | — | — | — | — | +54 | -46 | -183 | 48.8% | -0.18 | 7–7 (50%) | 2–5 (29%) | 99.5 | -1.54 | 1984 | 1700 | 134.4 | — | — | — | — | -8 | -31 | -113 | 50.6% | +0.12 | 5–6 (45%) | 3–5 (38%) | 98.1 | -0.03 |
| 20 | 1984 | 1776 | 143.1 | — | — | — | — | +40 | -6 | -187 | 53.3% | +0.21 | 6–10 (38%) | 2–5 (29%) | 91.3 | -0.56 | 1985 | 1634 | 117.7 | — | — | — | — | -18 | +11 | -72 | 41.3% | -0.66 | 5–7 (42%) | 2–2 (50%) | 96.4 | +0.45 |
| 21 | 1985 | 1681 | 93.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 16.7% | -2.92 | — | — | — | +0.63 | 1986 | 1636 | 124.6 | — | — | — | — | -96 | — | +70 | 42.6% | -0.57 | 3–5 (38%) | 3–3 (50%) | 100.2 | -0.59 |
| 22 | 1986 | 1628 | 92.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.83 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.13 | 1987 | 1765 | 138.1 | — | — | — | — | -110 | — | +24 | 59.0% | +0.54 | 4–9 (31%) | 3–1 (75%) | 97.8 | +0.01 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1703 | 132.9 | — | — | — | — | -74 | — | +78 | 48.4% | -0.06 | 4–8 (33%) | 5–2 (71%) | 97.7 | -1.02 |
| 24 | 1988 | 1608 | 97.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | +0.14 | 1989 | 1670 | 137.7 | — | — | — | — | -24 | — | +88 | 47.4% | -0.14 | 4–8 (33%) | 2–2 (50%) | 96.6 | -0.53 |
| 25 | 1989 | 1579 | 124.0 | — | — | — | — | +90 | — | — | 34.8% | -1.13 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–2 (33%) | 98.0 | +0.55 | 1990 | 1661 | 128.6 | — | — | — | — | +24 | — | +100 | 49.2% | -0.24 | 4–3 (57%) | 5–1 (83%) | 104.2 | -0.07 |
| 26 | 1990 | 1517 | 111.0 | — | — | — | — | +34 | — | +59 | 29.2% | -1.79 | 4–2 (67%) | 1–1 | — | +0.82 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1991 | 1505 | 113.4 | — | — | — | — | +4 | — | — | 34.6% | -1.46 | 3–1 (75%) | 1–0 | — | +0.52 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1993 | 1474 | 94.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.25 | — | — | — | +0.38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1994 | 1473 | 108.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.50 | — | — | — | -0.32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1883 | 138.7 | — | — | — | — | +56 | -86 | -135 | 46.4% | -0.44 | 29–34 (46%) | 15–19 (44%) | 98.3 | +0.32 | — | 1804 | 134.8 | — | — | — | — | -32 | -20 | +14 | 49.1% | -0.11 | 32–49 (40%) | 25–17 (60%) | 99.0 | -0.03 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eva Pfaff | 4 | 1 | 5 | May 1, 1991 | H2H |
| Martina Navratilova | 0 | 5 | 5 | Nov 3, 1989 | H2H |
| Chris Evert | 0 | 5 | 5 | Feb 4, 1989 | H2H |
| Liz Smylie | 1 | 3 | 4 | Nov 8, 1990 | H2H |
| Hana Mandlikova | 0 | 4 | 4 | Aug 25, 1989 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anne Minter | 3 | 5 | 8 | Feb 1, 1990 | H2H |
| Pam Shriver | 0 | 6 | 6 | Mar 21, 1989 | H2H |
| Claudia Kohde Kilsch | 1 | 5 | 6 | Feb 3, 1989 | H2H |
| Gabriela Sabatini | 0 | 5 | 5 | Mar 8, 1990 | H2H |
| Betsy Nagelsen | 4 | 1 | 5 | Mar 4, 1989 | H2H |