H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Andrea Leand vs Joanne Russell H2H: 1-1
Andrea Leand and Joanne Russell are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Joanne Russell leads 1–0 on carpet, while Andrea Leand leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Joanne Russell won the 1984 Brighton third round 7-6 2-6 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
Age 71
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 1984* | Brighton | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Joanne Russell | 7-6 2-6 6-0 | Andrea Leand | Match data |
| Oct 19, 1984* | Filderstadt | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Andrea Leand | 6-1 6-2 | Joanne Russell | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrea Leand | #857 | #27 | 13 | 1,883 | 83 | 104 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Joanne Russell | — | — | — | 1,935 | 203 | 199 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrea Leand | Joanne Russell | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1981 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1982 | 29–22 | 56.9% | — | 1,814 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1983 | 17–18 | 48.6% | — | 1,786 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 5–2 | 71.4% | — | 1,582 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1984 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #35 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 | 1975 | 17–12 | 58.6% | — | 1,693 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1985 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #33 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 | 1976 | 16–14 | 53.3% | — | 1,837 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1986 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 19–16 | 54.3% | — | 1,884 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 13–16 | 44.8% | — | 1,859 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #296 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,776 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1989 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #152 | 1,580 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 30–22 | 57.7% | — | 1,872 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1990 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #142 | 1,517 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 27–23 | 54.0% | — | 1,809 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1991 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #180 | 1,505 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 20–22 | 47.6% | — | 1,825 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 11–11 | 50.0% | — | 1,797 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #341 | 1,474 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 27–17 | 61.4% | — | 1,838 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #461 | 1,473 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 7–20 | 25.9% | — | 1,613 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 2–10 | 16.7% | — | 1,534 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,514 | 0 | 5 |