H2H data updated: 2026-10-27 00:00 UTC

Andrea Leand vs Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel H2H: 1-1

Andrea Leand and Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Andrea Leand leads 1–0 on carpet, while Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel won the 1983 Roland Garros round of 128 6-3 6-2.

USA Age 62 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
USA Age 59 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel 6-3 6-2 Andrea Leand Match data May 25, 1983* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Andrea Leand 7-5 7-5 Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel Match data Mar 4, 1982* R32 Los Angeles WTA 500 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Andrea Leand — #27 13 1,882 83 104 44.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel — #9 — 2,083 277 213 56.5% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andrea Leand Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 — — — — — — — 1980 4–5 44.4% — 1,505 0 0
14 — — — — — — — 1981 27–14 65.9% — 1,803 0 2
15 — — — — — — — 1982 30–19 61.2% — 1,873 0 2
16 — — — — — — — 1983 29–17 63.0% — 1,845 0 2
17 1981 4–3 57.1% — 1,563 0 0 1984 27–19 58.7% — 1,851 0 2
18 1982 29–22 56.9% — 1,813 0 0 1985 41–16 71.9% — 1,976 0 3
19 1983 17–18 48.6% — 1,785 0 0 1986 34–16 68.0% #9 1,975 0 4
20 1984 19–18 51.4% #35 1,775 0 1 1987 15–8 65.2% — 1,903 0 4
21 1985 1–5 16.7% — 1,681 0 1 1988 5–8 38.5% — 1,813 0 4
22 1986 0–3 0.0% — 1,628 0 1 1989 16–15 51.6% — 1,788 0 4
23 — — — — — — — 1990 15–18 45.5% — 1,697 0 4
24 1988 0–1 0.0% #296 1,607 0 1 1991 7–15 31.8% — 1,589 0 4
25 1989 3–7 30.0% #152 1,579 0 1 1992 10–15 40.0% — 1,586 0 4
26 1990 6–15 28.6% #142 1,516 0 1 1993 12–13 48.0% — 1,628 0 4
27 1991 4–9 30.8% #180 1,504 0 1 1994 1–5 16.7% — 1,585 0 4
28 — — — — — — — 1995 1–2 33.3% — 1,609 0 4
29 1993 0–2 0.0% #341 1,473 0 1 1996 3–8 27.3% — 1,555 0 4
30 1994 0–1 0.0% #461 1,472 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Andrea Leand Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 14 6 20 70.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 7 3 10 70.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 6 8 14 42.9%
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 8 5 13 61.5% 18 7 25 72.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
17 1981 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1984 6 3 9 66.7% 11 7 18 61.1% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5%
18 1982 10 4 14 71.4% 7 4 11 63.6% 3 5 8 37.5% 9 8 17 52.9% 1985 15 5 20 75.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 8 2 10 80.0% 9 5 14 64.3%
19 1983 7 3 10 70.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 6 8 25.0% 1986 7 4 11 63.6% 12 4 16 75.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 15 6 21 71.4%
20 1984 8 7 15 53.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1987 5 2 7 71.4% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
21 1985 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1988 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
22 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1989 8 7 15 53.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 11 10 21 52.4% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
24 1988 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 3 9 12 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 1989 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1992 5 8 13 38.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 1990 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 1993 5 7 12 41.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 1991 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1994 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1993 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
30 1994 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 37 36 73 50.7% 16 19 35 45.7% 10 18 28 35.7% 20 30 50 40.0% — 99 84 183 54.1% 98 59 157 62.4% 27 24 51 52.9% 49 43 92 53.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Andrea Leand Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1505 105.8 — — — — — — — 42.1% -0.42 1–0 1–1 — -0.02
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1804 135.2 — — — — -9 -131 -222 61.5% +1.17 9–5 (64%) 3–3 (50%) 105.4 +2.43
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1873 149.1 — — — — -69 -6 -216 60.4% +0.54 6–4 (60%) 7–2 (78%) 107.8 -3.09
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1846 139.3 — — — — -46 +102 -186 58.6% +0.96 12–7 (63%) 1–7 (13%) 99.3 +2.67
17 1981 1564 118.6 — — — — +112 — — 55.6% 0.00 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — +0.63 1984 1852 137.3 — — — — -38 +58 -144 55.9% +0.22 9–5 (64%) 3–1 (75%) 103.9 +0.53
18 1982 1814 151.3 — — — — +79 -159 -211 58.6% +0.34 6–10 (38%) 7–4 (64%) 102.1 -0.79 1985 1977 159.0 — — — — -30 -57 -101 70.6% +1.53 9–2 (82%) 3–5 (38%) 105.7 -3.00
19 1983 1786 132.7 — — — — +54 -46 -183 48.8% -0.18 7–7 (50%) 2–5 (29%) 99.5 -1.54 1986 1975 158.0 — — — — -2 +51 — 63.6% +1.08 8–6 (57%) 7–6 (54%) 101.3 -3.48
20 1984 1776 143.1 — — — — +40 -6 -187 53.3% +0.21 6–10 (38%) 2–5 (29%) 91.3 -0.56 1987 1904 131.1 — — — — +36 +49 — 61.4% +0.60 7–4 (64%) 4–1 (80%) 100.1 +0.21
21 1985 1681 93.5 — — — — — — — 16.7% -2.92 — — — +0.63 1988 1813 123.2 — — — — +53 — — 44.4% -0.67 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -1.28
22 1986 1628 92.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.83 — 0–1 — +0.13 1989 1789 141.3 — — — — +18 +110 -21 50.0% -0.29 7–3 (70%) 3–1 (75%) 103.8 -4.18
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1698 132.3 — — — — +66 +103 — 44.7% -0.36 8–4 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 101.6 +0.06
24 1988 1608 97.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.14 1991 1590 119.8 — — — — +56 +172 — 36.7% -0.67 3–4 (43%) 0–5 (0%) 93.8 +0.93
25 1989 1579 124.0 — — — — +90 — — 34.8% -1.13 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 98.0 +0.55 1992 1586 115.3 — — — — -4 +158 +154 45.2% -0.50 4–8 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 92.9 +1.34
26 1990 1517 111.0 — — — — +34 — +59 29.2% -1.79 4–2 (67%) 1–1 — +0.82 1993 1629 119.3 — — — — -56 +111 — 45.9% -0.25 7–4 (64%) 1–4 (20%) 101.8 +0.90
27 1991 1505 113.4 — — — — +4 — — 34.6% -1.46 3–1 (75%) 1–0 — +0.52 1994 1586 107.2 — — — — -57 — — 21.4% -2.00 1–1 — — -0.20
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1609 114.1 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.60 1–0 1–0 — -0.56
29 1993 1474 94.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.25 — — — +0.38 1996 1555 105.6 — — — — -33 +118 +211 35.7% -0.93 2–4 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 94.7 +0.42
30 1994 1473 108.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1883 138.7 — — — — +56 -86 -135 46.4% -0.44 29–34 (46%) 15–19 (44%) 98.3 +0.32 — 2083 146.0 — — — — -6 +45 -86 55.0% +0.38 95–63 (60%) 41–44 (48%) 102.1 -1.29

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.