H2H data updated: 2026-10-27 00:00 UTC

Andrea Leand vs Louise Field H2H: 1-2

Louise Field holds a 2–1 lead over Andrea Leand in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Louise Field leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Louise Field won the 1991 Westchester round of 32 6-1 2-0 RET.

USA Age 62 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main-draw meetings
AUS Age 59 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Louise Field #188 6-1 2-0 (ret.) Andrea Leand #177 Match data Jul 25, 1991* R32 Westchester Tier V → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Louise Field #126 6-3 7-5 Andrea Leand #97 Match data Aug 1, 1990* R64 Canadian Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Andrea Leand #190 6-3 6-3 Louise Field #103 Match data Aug 24, 1989* R32 Mahwah WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Andrea Leand — #27 13 1,882 83 104 44.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Louise Field — #96 12 1,550 58 121 32.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andrea Leand Louise Field
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,487 0 0
17 1981 4–3 57.1% — 1,563 0 0 1984 0–1 0.0% #248 1,485 0 0
18 1982 29–22 56.9% — 1,813 0 0 1985 4–6 40.0% #106 1,517 0 0
19 1983 17–18 48.6% — 1,785 0 0 1986 4–10 28.6% #157 1,479 0 0
20 1984 19–18 51.4% #35 1,775 0 1 1987 11–17 39.3% #113 1,453 0 0
21 1985 1–5 16.7% — 1,681 0 1 1988 4–13 23.5% #163 1,412 0 0
22 1986 0–3 0.0% — 1,628 0 1 1989 12–20 37.5% #100 1,542 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 1990 9–17 34.6% #125 1,523 0 0
24 1988 0–1 0.0% #296 1,607 0 1 1991 3–14 17.6% #193 1,435 0 0
25 1989 3–7 30.0% #152 1,579 0 1 1992 5–9 35.7% #170 1,449 0 0
26 1990 6–15 28.6% #142 1,516 0 1 1993 5–10 33.3% #175 1,471 0 0
27 1991 4–9 30.8% #180 1,504 0 1 1994 1–3 25.0% #197 1,477 0 0
29 1993 0–2 0.0% #341 1,473 0 1 — — — — — — —
30 1994 0–1 0.0% #461 1,472 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Andrea Leand Louise Field
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1981 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1984 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
18 1982 10 4 14 71.4% 7 4 11 63.6% 3 5 8 37.5% 9 8 17 52.9% 1985 — — — — — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
19 1983 7 3 10 70.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 6 8 25.0% 1986 1 4 5 20.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1984 8 7 15 53.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1987 3 6 9 33.3% 4 6 10 40.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1985 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1988 2 6 8 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
22 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1989 8 13 21 38.1% 0 4 4 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 5 8 13 38.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 1988 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 3 10 13 23.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 1989 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1992 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
26 1990 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 1993 4 8 12 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1991 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1994 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1993 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1994 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 37 36 73 50.7% 16 19 35 45.7% 10 18 28 35.7% 20 30 50 40.0% — 31 61 92 33.7% 7 26 33 21.2% 17 24 41 41.5% 3 7 10 30.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Andrea Leand Louise Field
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1488 98.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.16
17 1981 1564 118.6 — — — — +112 — — 55.6% 0.00 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — +0.63 1984 1485 99.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.09
18 1982 1814 151.3 — — — — +79 -159 -211 58.6% +0.34 6–10 (38%) 7–4 (64%) 102.1 -0.79 1985 1518 115.3 — — — — — — +108 42.9% -0.86 0–1 — — +0.31
19 1983 1786 132.7 — — — — +54 -46 -183 48.8% -0.18 7–7 (50%) 2–5 (29%) 99.5 -1.54 1986 1480 96.2 — — — — +51 +34 — 26.7% -1.53 2–0 0–2 — +1.71
20 1984 1776 143.1 — — — — +40 -6 -187 53.3% +0.21 6–10 (38%) 2–5 (29%) 91.3 -0.56 1987 1454 103.6 — — — — +25 +35 +128 40.6% -0.91 4–6 (40%) 6–4 (60%) 98.5 +2.99
21 1985 1681 93.5 — — — — — — — 16.7% -2.92 — — — +0.63 1988 1413 105.3 — — — — +8 +56 +118 30.6% -1.00 1–3 (25%) 3–3 (50%) 97.9 +1.11
22 1986 1628 92.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.83 — 0–1 — +0.13 1989 1543 115.0 — — — — -44 -110 +60 38.9% -0.89 4–4 (50%) 4–4 (50%) 102.8 +0.32
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1523 107.8 — — — — -25 -143 +110 41.9% -0.52 2–8 (20%) 1–1 — +1.49
24 1988 1608 97.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.14 1991 1436 97.7 — — — — +8 -99 — 21.6% -1.87 1–4 (20%) 2–6 (25%) 94.3 +0.83
25 1989 1579 124.0 — — — — +90 — — 34.8% -1.13 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 98.0 +0.55 1992 1449 98.5 — — — — +48 — — 38.9% -0.83 4–4 (50%) 3–1 (75%) 103.8 +1.27
26 1990 1517 111.0 — — — — +34 — +59 29.2% -1.79 4–2 (67%) 1–1 — +0.82 1993 1471 105.2 — — — — +12 — — 34.3% -1.49 3–2 (60%) 0–2 — +0.04
27 1991 1505 113.4 — — — — +4 — — 34.6% -1.46 3–1 (75%) 1–0 — +0.52 1994 1477 88.6 — — — — — — — 22.2% -2.55 1–0 0–1 — -0.23
29 1993 1474 94.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.25 — — — +0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1994 1473 108.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1883 138.7 — — — — +56 -86 -135 46.4% -0.44 29–34 (46%) 15–19 (44%) 98.3 +0.32 — 1551 106.4 — — — — +1 -13 +105 35.6% -1.07 22–33 (40%) 19–24 (44%) 96.1 +5.57

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.