H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Andrea Leand vs Louise Field H2H: 1-2
Louise Field holds a 2–1 lead over Andrea Leand in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Louise Field leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Louise Field won the 1991 Westchester third round 6-1 2-0 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 59
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 25, 1991* | Westchester | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Louise Field | 6-1 2-0 (ret.) | Andrea Leand | Match data |
| Jul 30, 1990 | Toronto | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Louise Field | 6-3 7-5 | Andrea Leand | Match data |
| Aug 24, 1989* | Mahwah | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Andrea Leand | 6-3 6-3 | Louise Field | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrea Leand | #857 | #27 | 13 | 1,883 | 83 | 104 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Louise Field | #752 | #96 | 12 | 1,579 | 58 | 121 | 32.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrea Leand | Louise Field | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1981 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #248 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1982 | 29–22 | 56.9% | — | 1,814 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #106 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1983 | 17–18 | 48.6% | — | 1,786 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #157 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1984 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #35 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #113 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1985 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #33 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #163 | 1,421 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1986 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #100 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #125 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #296 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #193 | 1,436 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1989 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #152 | 1,580 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #170 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1990 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #142 | 1,517 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #175 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1991 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #180 | 1,505 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #197 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #341 | 1,474 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #461 | 1,473 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |