H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Andrea Leand vs Mareen Louie Harper H2H: 2-0
Andrea Leand holds a 2–0 lead over Mareen Louie Harper in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Andrea Leand leads 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Andrea Leand won the 1984 Boston third round 6-7 7-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
Age 65
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 1984* | Boston | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Andrea Leand | 6-7 7-6 6-4 | Mareen Louie Harper | Match data |
| Jan 28, 1984* | Pittsburgh | WTA 250 | SF | Carpet | Andrea Leand | 6-1 6-1 | Mareen Louie Harper | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrea Leand | #857 | #27 | 13 | 1,883 | 83 | 104 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mareen Louie Harper | — | — | — | 1,911 | 177 | 239 | 42.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrea Leand | Mareen Louie Harper | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1981 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1982 | 29–22 | 56.9% | — | 1,814 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 4–13 | 23.5% | — | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1983 | 17–18 | 48.6% | — | 1,786 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 22–23 | 48.9% | — | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1984 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #35 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 16–20 | 44.4% | — | 1,743 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1985 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #33 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 9–18 | 33.3% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1986 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 7–10 | 41.2% | — | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 18–17 | 51.4% | — | 1,733 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #296 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 29–18 | 61.7% | — | 1,777 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1989 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #152 | 1,580 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 12–17 | 41.4% | — | 1,680 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1990 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #142 | 1,517 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,625 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1991 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #180 | 1,505 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 12–17 | 41.4% | — | 1,614 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 6–14 | 30.0% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #341 | 1,474 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 10–15 | 40.0% | — | 1,591 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #461 | 1,473 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 12–16 | 42.9% | — | 1,615 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1–7 | 12.5% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,537 | 0 | 2 |