H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Andrea Leand vs Tina Mochizuki H2H: 0-2

Tina Mochizuki holds a 2–0 lead over Andrea Leand in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tina Mochizuki leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Tina Mochizuki won the 1986 Charleston Open round of 32 6-4 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Andrea Leand
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Tina Mochizuki
USA Age 73

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tina Mochizuki 6-4 7-6 Andrea Leand #322 Match data Apr 24, 1986* R32 Charleston Open WTA 500 Clay
Tina Mochizuki 6-7 6-4 7-6 Andrea Leand Match data Jul 15, 1983* R16 Newport WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Andrea Leand #857 #27 13 1,881 83 104 44.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Tina Mochizuki — — — 1,679 84 134 38.5% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andrea Leand Tina Mochizuki
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1968 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1969 0–2 0.0% — 1,449 0 0
17 1981 4–3 57.1% — 1,563 0 0 1970 0–2 0.0% — 1,424 0 0
18 1982 29–22 56.9% — 1,812 0 0 1971 2–3 40.0% — 1,445 0 0
19 1983 17–18 48.6% — 1,784 0 0 1972 3–5 37.5% — 1,432 0 0
20 1984 19–18 51.4% #35 1,774 0 1 1973 3–2 60.0% — 1,463 0 0
21 1985 1–5 16.7% #33 1,681 0 1 1974 0–1 0.0% — 1,452 0 0
22 1986 0–3 0.0% #214 1,627 0 1 — — — — — — —
24 1988 0–1 0.0% #296 1,607 0 1 — — — — — — —
25 1989 3–7 30.0% #152 1,579 0 1 1978 0–1 0.0% — 1,438 0 0
26 1990 6–15 28.6% #142 1,516 0 1 — — — — — — —
27 1991 4–9 30.8% #180 1,504 0 1 1980 15–10 60.0% — 1,552 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 1981 13–7 65.0% — 1,612 0 1
29 1993 0–2 0.0% #341 1,473 0 1 1982 6–3 66.7% — 1,629 0 1
30 1994 0–1 0.0% #461 1,472 0 1 1983 11–13 45.8% — 1,602 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 1984 5–17 22.7% — 1,454 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 1985 5–12 29.4% — 1,475 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 1986 11–19 36.7% — 1,521 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 1987 8–25 24.2% — 1,455 0 1
35 — — — — — — — 1988 2–11 15.4% — 1,411 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Andrea Leand Tina Mochizuki
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1981 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1970 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1982 10 4 14 71.4% 7 4 11 63.6% 3 5 8 37.5% 9 8 17 52.9% 1971 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1983 7 3 10 70.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 6 8 25.0% 1972 2 2 4 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1984 8 7 15 53.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1973 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1985 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1974 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1988 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1989 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1990 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1991 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1980 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1993 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
30 1994 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1983 3 5 8 37.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 2 9 11 18.2% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 3 4 7 42.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 7 9 16 43.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 3 9 12 25.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0%
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 0 7 7 0.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 37 36 73 50.7% 16 19 35 45.7% 10 18 28 35.7% 20 30 50 40.0% — 36 62 98 36.7% 9 27 36 25.0% 12 21 33 36.4% 5 12 17 29.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Andrea Leand Tina Mochizuki
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 1484 98.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.09
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 1450 94.9 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–1 — — +0.55
17 1981 1564 118.3 — — — — +112 — — 55.6% 0.00 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — +0.64 1970 1425 82.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.75 — — — +0.38
18 1982 1813 151.1 — — — — +80 -158 -211 58.6% +0.34 6–10 (38%) 7–4 (64%) 102.1 -2.70 1971 1446 105.4 — — — — — +83 — 41.7% -1.67 1–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.16
19 1983 1785 132.5 — — — — +54 -45 -182 48.8% -0.18 7–7 (50%) 2–5 (29%) 99.5 -1.64 1972 1432 89.9 — — — — +20 +60 — 35.3% -1.53 1–0 1–0 — +1.65
20 1984 1775 142.9 — — — — +39 -6 -186 53.3% +0.21 6–10 (38%) 2–5 (29%) 91.3 -0.75 1973 1464 107.3 — — — — +59 — — 54.5% +0.55 1–0 0–1 — +0.92
21 1985 1681 93.6 — — — — — — — 16.7% -2.92 — — — +0.61 1974 1453 100.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.16
22 1986 1628 92.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.83 — 0–1 — +0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1988 1608 97.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1989 1579 123.9 — — — — +89 — — 34.8% -1.13 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 98.0 +0.47 1978 1438 98.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.06
26 1990 1517 111.0 — — — — +34 — +59 29.2% -1.79 4–2 (67%) 1–1 — +0.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1991 1505 113.3 — — — — +4 — — 34.6% -1.46 3–1 (75%) 1–0 — +0.52 1980 1552 114.3 — — — — +26 — — 58.6% +0.64 4–4 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 102.3 +2.50
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1612 122.2 — — — — — — — 61.2% +0.75 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 101.0 -0.50
29 1993 1474 94.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.25 — — — +0.38 1982 1630 109.6 — — — — -12 — — 57.9% +0.47 2–1 (67%) — — +1.68
30 1994 1472 108.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.32 1983 1603 109.9 — — — — -3 -38 +4 45.0% -0.18 7–5 (58%) 2–5 (29%) 99.8 +2.25
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1454 106.3 — — — — +20 +74 +143 34.6% -0.73 0–8 (0%) 1–5 (17%) 87.8 +1.89
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1476 106.7 — — — — +39 -8 +73 27.8% -1.78 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 100.1 +0.99
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1522 112.2 — — — — +26 -72 +33 36.4% -1.26 4–2 (67%) 6–3 (67%) 106.4 +1.60
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1455 108.3 — — — — +35 -45 +65 27.4% -1.58 3–6 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 99.7 +0.36
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1412 109.7 — — — — -11 — +90 25.8% -1.32 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) 96.9 +0.19
Career — 1882 138.5 — — — — +56 -85 -134 46.4% -0.44 29–34 (46%) 15–19 (44%) 98.3 -0.85 — 1680 112.0 — — — — +21 +8 +60 40.2% -0.71 31–39 (44%) 20–25 (44%) 98.4 +6.88

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.