H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Andrea Leand vs Tina Mochizuki H2H: 0-2
Tina Mochizuki holds a 2–0 lead over Andrea Leand in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tina Mochizuki leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Tina Mochizuki won the 1986 Charleston third round 6-4 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
Age 73
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 1986* | Charleston | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Tina Mochizuki | 6-4 7-6 | Andrea Leand | Match data |
| Jul 15, 1983* | Newport | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Tina Mochizuki | 6-7 6-4 7-6 | Andrea Leand | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrea Leand | #857 | #27 | 13 | 1,883 | 83 | 104 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Tina Mochizuki | — | — | — | 1,684 | 84 | 134 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrea Leand | Tina Mochizuki | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,449 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1981 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,425 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1982 | 29–22 | 56.9% | — | 1,814 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1983 | 17–18 | 48.6% | — | 1,786 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,433 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1984 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #35 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 | 1973 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1985 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #33 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 | 1974 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,454 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1986 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #296 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1989 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #152 | 1,580 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,439 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1990 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #142 | 1,517 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1991 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #180 | 1,505 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 15–10 | 60.0% | — | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 13–7 | 65.0% | — | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #341 | 1,474 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,642 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #461 | 1,473 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 11–13 | 45.8% | — | 1,606 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 5–17 | 22.7% | — | 1,456 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 5–12 | 29.4% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 11–19 | 36.7% | — | 1,523 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 8–25 | 24.2% | — | 1,457 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 2–11 | 15.4% | — | 1,413 | 0 | 1 |