H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Andrea Leand vs Zina Garrison H2H: 0-2
Zina Garrison holds a 2–0 lead over Andrea Leand in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Zina Garrison leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Zina Garrison won the 1990 Wimbledon third round 6-0 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 1990* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Zina Garrison | 6-0 6-3 | Andrea Leand | Match data |
| Jan 14, 1983* | Houston | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Zina Garrison | 4-6 6-2 6-3 | Andrea Leand | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrea Leand | #857 | #27 | 13 | 1,883 | 83 | 104 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Zina Garrison | #318 | #4 | 134 | 2,142 | 581 | 268 | 68.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 15 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrea Leand | Zina Garrison | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,529 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 1981 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1982 | 29–22 | 56.9% | — | 1,814 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 23–15 | 60.5% | — | 1,853 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1983 | 17–18 | 48.6% | — | 1,786 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 38–18 | 67.9% | — | 1,989 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1984 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #35 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #9 | 2,012 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1985 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #33 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #8 | 2,032 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1986 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 48–22 | 68.6% | #11 | 1,999 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 44–17 | 72.1% | #9 | 1,987 | 0 | 7 |
| 24 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #296 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 49–20 | 71.0% | #9 | 2,021 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 1989 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #152 | 1,580 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 60–15 | 80.0% | #4 | 2,130 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 1990 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #142 | 1,517 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 48–18 | 72.7% | #10 | 2,039 | 0 | 11 |
| 27 | 1991 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #180 | 1,505 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #12 | 1,963 | 0 | 11 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 36–19 | 65.5% | #18 | 1,924 | 0 | 12 |
| 29 | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #341 | 1,474 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #14 | 1,995 | 0 | 14 |
| 30 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #461 | 1,473 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,889 | 0 | 14 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #22 | 1,868 | 0 | 15 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #273 | 1,704 | 0 | 15 |