H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Andrea Temesvari vs Catarina Lindqvist Ryan H2H: 0-2
Catarina Lindqvist Ryan holds a 2–0 lead over Andrea Temesvari in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Catarina Lindqvist Ryan leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Catarina Lindqvist Ryan won the 1986 Montreal fourth round 6-4 4-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
HUN
Age 60
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 1986* | Montreal | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | 6-4 4-6 6-4 | Andrea Temesvari | Match data |
| Oct 22, 1981* | Brighton | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | 6-4 7-6 | Andrea Temesvari | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrea Temesvari | #932 | #7 | 109 | 2,021 | 185 | 178 | 51.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | — | — | — | 1,989 | 259 | 190 | 57.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Andrea Temesvari | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1981 | 11–6 | 64.7% | — | 1,626 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 18–14 | 56.2% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 42–15 | 73.7% | — | 1,988 | 0 | 4 | 1982 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #14 | 1,888 | 0 | 4 | 1983 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,847 | 0 | 5 | 1984 | 28–16 | 63.6% | — | 1,790 | 0 | 2 |
| 1986 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #43 | 1,787 | 0 | 5 | 1985 | 44–18 | 71.0% | — | 1,974 | 0 | 3 |
| 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #193 | 1,762 | 0 | 5 | 1986 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,881 | 0 | 3 |
| 1989 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #43 | 1,752 | 0 | 5 | 1987 | 34–20 | 63.0% | — | 1,874 | 0 | 3 |
| 1990 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #117 | 1,612 | 0 | 5 | 1988 | 27–22 | 55.1% | — | 1,798 | 0 | 3 |
| 1991 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #159 | 1,542 | 0 | 5 | 1989 | 29–19 | 60.4% | — | 1,785 | 0 | 3 |
| 1992 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #70 | 1,616 | 0 | 5 | 1990 | 19–16 | 54.3% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 4 |
| 1993 | 5–20 | 20.0% | #153 | 1,480 | 0 | 5 | 1991 | 25–22 | 53.2% | — | 1,716 | 0 | 5 |
| 1994 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #133 | 1,480 | 0 | 5 | 1992 | 14–15 | 48.3% | — | 1,658 | 0 | 5 |
| 1995 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #90 | 1,487 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1996 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #181 | 1,537 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #940 | 1,533 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |