H2H data updated: 2026-10-27 00:00 UTC

Andrea Temesvari vs Cecilia Dahlman H2H: 1-0

Andrea Temesvari holds a 1–0 lead over Cecilia Dahlman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Andrea Temesvari leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Andrea Temesvari won the 1990 Roland Garros round of 128 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Andrea Temesvari
HUN Age 60 Right-Handed 182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Cecilia Dahlman
SWE Age 58 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Andrea Temesvari #66 6-2 6-1 Cecilia Dahlman #75 Match data May 30, 1990* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Andrea Temesvari — #7 109 2,022 185 179 50.8% 0 0 0 1 4 5
Cecilia Dahlman — #63 17 1,673 38 63 37.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andrea Temesvari Cecilia Dahlman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1981 11–6 64.7% — 1,624 0 1 — — — — — — —
16 1982 18–14 56.2% — 1,771 0 1 1985 0–1 0.0% #297 1,482 0 0
17 1983 42–15 73.7% — 1,990 0 4 — — — — — — —
18 1984 24–16 60.0% #14 1,889 0 4 — — — — — — —
19 1985 18–12 60.0% #16 1,849 0 5 1988 2–5 28.6% #165 1,478 0 0
20 1986 11–12 47.8% #43 1,802 0 5 1989 9–9 50.0% #94 1,585 0 1
21 1987 1–2 33.3% — 1,776 0 5 1990 16–20 44.4% #82 1,639 0 2
22 — — — — — — — 1991 6–18 25.0% #189 1,490 0 2
23 1989 18–15 54.5% #43 1,750 0 5 1992 2–4 33.3% #123 1,497 0 2
24 1990 8–19 29.6% #117 1,612 0 5 1993 3–6 33.3% — 1,513 0 2
25 1991 6–14 30.0% #159 1,542 0 5 — — — — — — —
26 1992 11–12 47.8% #70 1,607 0 5 — — — — — — —
27 1993 5–20 20.0% #153 1,475 0 5 — — — — — — —
28 1994 2–7 22.2% #133 1,476 0 5 — — — — — — —
29 1995 6–8 42.9% #90 1,485 0 5 — — — — — — —
30 1996 4–6 40.0% #181 1,532 0 5 — — — — — — —
31 1997 0–1 0.0% #940 1,529 0 5 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Andrea Temesvari Cecilia Dahlman
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1981 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1982 3 3 6 50.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1985 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1983 2 2 4 50.0% 29 5 34 85.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 9 7 16 56.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1984 5 3 8 62.5% 10 6 16 62.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1985 7 3 10 70.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1988 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1986 6 5 11 54.5% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 1989 0 4 4 0.0% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1987 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 3 6 9 33.3% 8 9 17 47.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 3 7 10 30.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
23 1989 9 7 16 56.3% 8 5 13 61.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1992 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
24 1990 1 7 8 12.5% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1993 — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
25 1991 2 5 7 28.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1992 4 4 8 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1993 3 9 12 25.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1994 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1995 1 2 3 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1996 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1997 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 44 57 101 43.6% 89 62 151 58.9% 15 15 30 50.0% 26 43 69 37.7% — 6 18 24 25.0% 22 28 50 44.0% 3 8 11 27.3% 7 9 16 43.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Andrea Temesvari Cecilia Dahlman
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1981 1624 130.8 — — — — — — — 60.5% +0.97 3–1 (75%) 0–2 — -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1982 1772 146.5 — — — — -152 -31 -162 59.2% +0.69 3–6 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 100.6 -3.02 1985 1482 96.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.21
17 1983 1990 163.1 — — — — -215 +103 -366 75.4% +2.16 4–4 (50%) 3–3 (50%) 101.7 +1.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1984 1890 136.6 — — — — -79 +109 -174 61.2% +0.68 5–4 (56%) 6–2 (75%) 105.4 +3.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1985 1849 136.5 — — — — -48 +129 — 61.5% +0.86 3–4 (43%) 4–4 (50%) 95.7 +1.41 1988 1478 107.9 — — — — — +33 — 38.9% -0.72 1–3 (25%) 2–1 (67%) 99.2 +0.23
20 1986 1802 139.5 — — — — -39 +157 — 55.1% +0.29 2–5 (29%) 2–3 (40%) 94.1 -0.74 1989 1586 124.2 — — — — -77 +74 — 47.6% -0.36 4–2 (67%) 1–4 (20%) 100.9 +1.27
21 1987 1776 105.3 — — — — -39 — — 42.9% -1.29 0–1 — — -0.17 1990 1640 129.0 — — — — -81 +23 -21 46.3% -0.49 3–5 (38%) 6–0 (100%) 104.5 +0.28
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1490 103.6 — — — — +46 +74 +73 26.5% -1.57 2–3 (40%) 3–1 (75%) 99.0 +1.03
23 1989 1751 135.3 — — — — -31 +153 — 50.0% -0.01 7–3 (70%) 5–6 (45%) 102.1 -0.31 1992 1497 106.0 — — — — +33 — — 40.0% -1.00 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +0.33
24 1990 1612 121.4 — — — — +9 +190 — 34.5% -1.48 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 98.1 +0.21 1993 1513 115.6 — — — — — +90 — 35.0% -1.05 1–1 0–3 (0%) — -0.48
25 1991 1542 110.6 — — — — +7 +224 +66 36.4% -1.34 0–4 (0%) 1–4 (20%) 92.0 +0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1992 1608 122.1 — — — — -5 +81 +64 41.5% -0.70 7–2 (78%) 3–3 (50%) 106.9 +0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1993 1476 111.1 — — — — +32 +134 — 28.8% -1.37 3–5 (38%) 2–4 (33%) 97.7 +0.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1994 1477 113.1 — — — — +1 +154 — 27.8% -1.83 1–1 — — -0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1995 1486 104.7 — — — — -22 +124 — 43.8% -0.38 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 100.7 +1.71 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1996 1532 128.1 — — — — — +113 — 45.5% -0.36 0–2 1–2 (33%) — -0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1997 1529 108.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — -0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2022 143.4 — — — — -57 +117 -111 52.6% +0.18 42–48 (47%) 33–38 (46%) 97.5 +1.11 — 1673 122.1 — — — — -17 +53 +10 39.8% -0.82 12–16 (43%) 13–9 (59%) 101.7 +2.90

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.