H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Andrea Temesvari vs Claudia Porwik H2H: 2-0 (incl. walkovers)

Andrea Temesvari vs Claudia Porwik: 1–0 excluding walkovers; 2–0 including 1 walkover. Across 2 main-draw results including walkovers, Andrea Temesvari leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Andrea Temesvari won the 1992 Brisbane International round of 32 W/O.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Andrea Temesvari
HUN Age 60 Right-Handed 182 cm / 6'0"
H2H including walkovers
2 – 0
2 main-draw results
Claudia Porwik
GER Age 57

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Andrea Temesvari #159 (w/o) Claudia Porwik #80 Match data Jan 2, 1992* R32 Brisbane International Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Andrea Temesvari #19 6-1 6-2 Claudia Porwik #130 Match data May 15, 1986* R32 Berlin Open WTA 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Andrea Temesvari #932 #7 109 2,021 185 179 50.8% 0 0 0 1 4 5
Claudia Porwik #579 #29 148 1,786 114 146 43.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andrea Temesvari Claudia Porwik
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1981 11–6 64.7% — 1,624 0 1 — — — — — — —
16 1982 18–14 56.2% — 1,770 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1983 42–15 73.7% — 1,989 0 4 1986 6–5 54.5% #96 1,577 0 0
18 1984 24–16 60.0% #14 1,889 0 4 1987 13–19 40.6% #104 1,581 0 0
19 1985 18–12 60.0% #16 1,848 0 5 1988 11–16 40.7% #68 1,571 0 0
20 1986 11–12 47.8% #43 1,801 0 5 1989 19–18 51.4% #75 1,660 0 0
21 1987 1–2 33.3% #193 1,775 0 5 1990 18–17 51.4% #29 1,667 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 1991 14–20 41.2% #80 1,644 0 0
23 1989 18–15 54.5% #43 1,750 0 5 1992 12–18 40.0% #98 1,605 0 0
24 1990 8–19 29.6% #117 1,611 0 5 1993 13–20 39.4% #92 1,601 0 0
25 1991 6–14 30.0% #159 1,542 0 5 1994 0–1 0.0% #256 1,585 0 0
26 1992 11–12 47.8% #70 1,607 0 5 1995 4–7 36.4% #133 1,551 0 0
27 1993 5–20 20.0% #153 1,475 0 5 1996 4–5 44.4% #153 1,563 0 0
28 1994 2–7 22.2% #133 1,476 0 5 — — — — — — —
29 1995 6–8 42.9% #90 1,485 0 5 — — — — — — —
30 1996 4–6 40.0% #181 1,532 0 5 — — — — — — —
31 1997 0–1 0.0% #940 1,528 0 5 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Andrea Temesvari Claudia Porwik
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1981 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1982 3 3 6 50.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1983 2 2 4 50.0% 29 5 34 85.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 9 7 16 56.3% 1986 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1984 5 3 8 62.5% 10 6 16 62.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 1987 4 7 11 36.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
19 1985 7 3 10 70.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1988 7 6 13 53.8% 0 4 4 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
20 1986 6 5 11 54.5% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 1989 15 13 28 53.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1987 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 16 12 28 57.1% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 10 13 23 43.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
23 1989 9 7 16 56.3% 8 5 13 61.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1992 5 11 16 31.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6%
24 1990 1 7 8 12.5% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1993 7 11 18 38.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
25 1991 2 5 7 28.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1994 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1992 4 4 8 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1995 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 1993 3 9 12 25.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1996 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1994 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1995 1 2 3 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1996 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1997 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 44 57 101 43.6% 89 62 151 58.9% 15 15 30 50.0% 26 43 69 37.7% — 73 83 156 46.8% 13 21 34 38.2% 11 20 31 35.5% 17 22 39 43.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Andrea Temesvari Claudia Porwik
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1981 1624 130.8 — — — — — — — 60.5% +0.97 3–1 (75%) 0–2 — +0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1982 1771 146.3 — — — — -152 -30 -161 59.2% +0.69 3–6 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 100.6 -2.86 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1983 1989 163.0 — — — — -215 +103 -366 75.4% +2.16 4–4 (50%) 3–3 (50%) 101.7 +1.64 1986 1577 117.2 — — — — +14 +33 — 50.0% -0.42 3–1 (75%) 3–1 (75%) 105.3 +0.65
18 1984 1889 136.5 — — — — -78 +109 -173 61.2% +0.68 5–4 (56%) 6–2 (75%) 105.3 +3.39 1987 1582 120.5 — — — — -4 +32 -42 44.7% -0.46 4–8 (33%) 4–1 (80%) 97.8 +1.43
19 1985 1849 136.4 — — — — -49 +129 — 61.5% +0.86 3–4 (43%) 4–4 (50%) 95.7 +1.35 1988 1572 125.4 — — — — +20 -30 +14 41.4% -0.72 2–2 (50%) 5–2 (71%) 103.4 +0.38
20 1986 1802 139.4 — — — — -40 +157 — 55.1% +0.29 2–5 (29%) 2–3 (40%) 94.1 -1.37 1989 1661 127.0 — — — — 0 -72 — 52.9% +0.09 4–7 (36%) 2–3 (40%) 97.4 +0.85
21 1987 1776 105.3 — — — — -40 — — 42.9% -1.29 0–1 — — -0.17 1990 1667 133.5 — — — — +11 — — 52.5% +0.25 6–8 (43%) 5–2 (71%) 99.4 +1.00
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1645 123.9 — — — — +28 -98 — 42.7% -0.60 3–4 (43%) 5–4 (56%) 100.4 -1.33
23 1989 1751 135.2 — — — — -31 +153 — 50.0% -0.01 7–3 (70%) 5–6 (45%) 102.1 -0.26 1992 1606 119.1 — — — — +1 — -25 43.3% -0.63 4–5 (44%) 2–2 (50%) 97.3 +1.85
24 1990 1612 121.4 — — — — +8 +190 — 34.5% -1.48 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 98.1 +0.21 1993 1601 124.1 — — — — -13 -41 +10 42.3% -0.62 3–4 (43%) 3–4 (43%) 97.9 -0.38
25 1991 1542 110.6 — — — — +7 +224 +66 36.4% -1.34 0–4 (0%) 1–4 (20%) 92.0 +0.26 1994 1585 97.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.19
26 1992 1607 122.1 — — — — -5 +82 +65 41.5% -0.70 7–2 (78%) 3–3 (50%) 106.9 +0.25 1995 1551 111.6 — — — — +11 — — 44.4% +0.07 1–4 (20%) 1–4 (20%) 95.2 -0.10
27 1993 1476 111.1 — — — — +31 +134 — 28.8% -1.37 3–5 (38%) 2–4 (33%) 97.7 +0.66 1996 1564 110.4 — — — — +28 — — 55.0% +0.25 1–3 (25%) — — +0.74
28 1994 1477 113.1 — — — — +1 +154 — 27.8% -1.83 1–1 — — -0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1995 1486 104.6 — — — — -22 +124 — 43.8% -0.38 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 100.7 +1.71 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1996 1532 128.1 — — — — — +113 — 45.5% -0.36 0–2 1–2 (33%) — -0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1997 1529 108.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — -0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2021 143.3 — — — — -57 +117 -110 52.6% +0.18 42–48 (47%) 33–38 (46%) 97.5 +1.14 — 1787 129.2 — — — — +7 -22 -6 46.3% -0.33 31–46 (40%) 30–23 (57%) 98.7 +2.04

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.