H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Andrea Temesvari vs Jana Novotna H2H: 1-1
Andrea Temesvari and Jana Novotna are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Andrea Temesvari won the 1992 Brisbane fourth round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
HUN
Age 60
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 1992* | Brisbane | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Andrea Temesvari | 6-3 6-3 | Jana Novotna | Match data |
| Jan 19, 1990* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Jana Novotna | 6-1 6-1 | Andrea Temesvari | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrea Temesvari | #932 | #7 | 109 | 2,021 | 185 | 178 | 51.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Jana Novotna | #18 | #2 | 5,063 | 2,224 | 504 | 198 | 71.8% | 1 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 13 | 24 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrea Temesvari | Jana Novotna | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1981 | 11–6 | 64.7% | — | 1,626 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1982 | 18–14 | 56.2% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1983 | 42–15 | 73.7% | — | 1,988 | 0 | 4 | 1986 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1984 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #14 | 1,888 | 0 | 4 | 1987 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #47 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1985 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,847 | 0 | 5 | 1988 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #35 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1986 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #43 | 1,787 | 0 | 5 | 1989 | 45–17 | 72.6% | #11 | 1,962 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #193 | 1,762 | 0 | 5 | 1990 | 40–16 | 71.4% | #13 | 2,016 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #7 | 2,072 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 1989 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #43 | 1,752 | 0 | 5 | 1992 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #10 | 2,089 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1990 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #117 | 1,612 | 0 | 5 | 1993 | 46–15 | 75.4% | #6 | 2,103 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 1991 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #159 | 1,542 | 0 | 5 | 1994 | 43–11 | 79.6% | #4 | 2,141 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 1992 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #70 | 1,616 | 0 | 5 | 1995 | 30–12 | 71.4% | #11 | 2,031 | 0 | 11 |
| 27 | 1993 | 5–20 | 20.0% | #153 | 1,480 | 0 | 5 | 1996 | 47–12 | 79.7% | #5 | 2,209 | 0 | 15 |
| 28 | 1994 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #133 | 1,480 | 0 | 5 | 1997 | 52–15 | 77.6% | #2 | 2,173 | 0 | 19 |
| 29 | 1995 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #90 | 1,487 | 0 | 5 | 1998 | 50–14 | 78.1% | #3 | 2,129 | 1 | 23 |
| 30 | 1996 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #181 | 1,537 | 0 | 5 | 1999 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #18 | 1,924 | 1 | 24 |
| 31 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #940 | 1,533 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |