H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Andrea Temesvari vs Judith Wiesner H2H: 0-1
Judith Wiesner holds a 1–0 lead over Andrea Temesvari in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Judith Wiesner leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Judith Wiesner won the 1992 US Open first round 6-3 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
HUN
Age 60
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 60
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 1992* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Judith Wiesner | 6-3 7-6(4) | Andrea Temesvari | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrea Temesvari | #932 | #7 | 109 | 2,021 | 185 | 178 | 51.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Judith Wiesner | #48 | #12 | 1,590 | 1,979 | 302 | 177 | 63.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrea Temesvari | Judith Wiesner | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1981 | 11–6 | 64.7% | — | 1,626 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1982 | 18–14 | 56.2% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1983 | 42–15 | 73.7% | — | 1,988 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1984 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #14 | 1,888 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1985 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,847 | 0 | 5 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #43 | 1,787 | 0 | 5 | 1986 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #141 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #193 | 1,762 | 0 | 5 | 1987 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #33 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #33 | 1,751 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1989 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #43 | 1,752 | 0 | 5 | 1989 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #35 | 1,736 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1990 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #117 | 1,612 | 0 | 5 | 1990 | 41–19 | 68.3% | #17 | 1,845 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1991 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #159 | 1,542 | 0 | 5 | 1991 | 28–14 | 66.7% | #16 | 1,962 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1992 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #70 | 1,616 | 0 | 5 | 1992 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #25 | 1,916 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1993 | 5–20 | 20.0% | #153 | 1,480 | 0 | 5 | 1993 | 30–17 | 63.8% | #21 | 1,906 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1994 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #133 | 1,480 | 0 | 5 | 1994 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #25 | 1,893 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 1995 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #90 | 1,487 | 0 | 5 | 1995 | 28–14 | 66.7% | #25 | 1,914 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 1996 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #181 | 1,537 | 0 | 5 | 1996 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #15 | 1,925 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #940 | 1,533 | 0 | 5 | 1997 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #48 | 1,829 | 0 | 5 |