H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Andrea Temesvari vs Kate Gompert H2H: 1-0
Andrea Temesvari holds a 1–0 lead over Kate Gompert in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Andrea Temesvari leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Andrea Temesvari won the 1985 Indianapolis US Clay semifinal 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
HUN
Age 60
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 63
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 1985* | Indianapolis US Clay | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Andrea Temesvari | 6-3 6-4 | Kate Gompert | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrea Temesvari | #932 | #7 | 109 | 2,021 | 185 | 178 | 51.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Kate Gompert | #316 | #18 | 34 | 1,870 | 85 | 81 | 51.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrea Temesvari | Kate Gompert | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1981 | 11–6 | 64.7% | — | 1,626 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1982 | 18–14 | 56.2% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1983 | 42–15 | 73.7% | — | 1,988 | 0 | 4 | 1980 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1984 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #14 | 1,888 | 0 | 4 | 1981 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1985 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,847 | 0 | 5 | 1982 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #43 | 1,787 | 0 | 5 | 1983 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #193 | 1,762 | 0 | 5 | 1984 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #98 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 11–8 | 57.9% | — | 1,710 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1989 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #43 | 1,752 | 0 | 5 | 1986 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #35 | 1,778 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1990 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #117 | 1,612 | 0 | 5 | 1987 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #22 | 1,829 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1991 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #159 | 1,542 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1992 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #70 | 1,616 | 0 | 5 | 1989 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #175 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1993 | 5–20 | 20.0% | #153 | 1,480 | 0 | 5 | 1990 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #301 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1994 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #133 | 1,480 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1995 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #90 | 1,487 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1996 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #181 | 1,537 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #940 | 1,533 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |