H2H data updated: 2026-10-18 00:00 UTC

Andrea Temesvari vs Laura Arraya H2H: 1-2

Laura Arraya holds a 2–1 lead over Andrea Temesvari in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Laura Arraya leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Laura Arraya won the 1984 Orlando quarterfinal 4-6 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Andrea Temesvari
HUN Age 60 Right-Handed 182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main-draw meetings
Laura Arraya
PER Age 62 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Laura Arraya #32 4-6 6-3 6-2 Andrea Temesvari #12 Match data Apr 28, 1984* QF Orlando WTA 500 Clay
Laura Arraya #48 6-4 6-2 Andrea Temesvari #7 Match data Jan 27, 1984* R16 Marco Island WTA 250 Clay
Andrea Temesvari 6-1 3-6 6-3 Laura Arraya Match data Jan 25, 1983* R32 Marco Island WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Andrea Temesvari #932 #7 109 2,022 185 179 50.8% 0 0 0 1 4 5
Laura Arraya #192 #14 51 1,922 270 204 57.0% 0 0 0 0 10 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andrea Temesvari Laura Arraya
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1981 11–6 64.7% — 1,624 0 1 — — — — — — —
16 1982 18–14 56.2% — 1,771 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1983 42–15 73.7% — 1,990 0 4 1981 19–8 70.4% — 1,685 0 4
18 1984 24–16 60.0% #14 1,889 0 4 1982 33–17 66.0% — 1,741 0 7
19 1985 18–12 60.0% #16 1,849 0 5 1983 23–23 50.0% — 1,713 0 7
20 1986 11–12 47.8% #43 1,802 0 5 1984 29–18 61.7% #34 1,760 0 8
21 1987 1–2 33.3% #193 1,776 0 5 1985 17–21 44.7% #63 1,691 0 8
22 — — — — — — — 1986 23–24 48.9% #33 1,718 0 8
23 1989 18–15 54.5% #43 1,750 0 5 1987 16–14 53.3% #45 1,770 0 8
24 1990 8–19 29.6% #117 1,612 0 5 — — — — — — —
25 1991 6–14 30.0% #159 1,542 0 5 1989 27–12 69.2% #19 1,882 0 10
26 1992 11–12 47.8% #70 1,607 0 5 1990 26–19 57.8% #21 1,821 0 10
27 1993 5–20 20.0% #153 1,475 0 5 1991 28–17 62.2% #24 1,823 0 10
28 1994 2–7 22.2% #133 1,476 0 5 1992 20–19 51.3% #45 1,732 0 10
29 1995 6–8 42.9% #90 1,485 0 5 1993 9–12 42.9% #71 1,682 0 10
30 1996 4–6 40.0% #181 1,532 0 5 — — — — — — —
31 1997 0–1 0.0% #940 1,529 0 5 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Andrea Temesvari Laura Arraya
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1981 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1982 3 3 6 50.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1983 2 2 4 50.0% 29 5 34 85.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 9 7 16 56.3% 1981 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1984 5 3 8 62.5% 10 6 16 62.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 1982 10 6 16 62.5% 23 10 33 69.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1985 7 3 10 70.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1983 10 8 18 55.6% 10 11 21 47.6% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0%
20 1986 6 5 11 54.5% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 1984 7 7 14 50.0% 19 7 26 73.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
21 1987 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 9 9 18 50.0% 7 9 16 43.8% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 3 7 10 30.0% 14 8 22 63.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 6 7 13 46.2%
23 1989 9 7 16 56.3% 8 5 13 61.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1987 7 5 12 58.3% 7 8 15 46.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
24 1990 1 7 8 12.5% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1991 2 5 7 28.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1989 15 3 18 83.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0%
26 1992 4 4 8 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1990 13 6 19 68.4% 7 6 13 53.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
27 1993 3 9 12 25.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1991 18 12 30 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
28 1994 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 8 9 17 47.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 5 10 50.0%
29 1995 1 2 3 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 4 6 10 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
30 1996 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1997 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 44 57 101 43.6% 89 62 151 58.9% 15 15 30 50.0% 26 43 69 37.7% — 105 80 185 56.8% 103 73 176 58.5% 16 14 30 53.3% 28 31 59 47.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Andrea Temesvari Laura Arraya
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1981 1624 130.8 — — — — — — — 60.5% +0.97 3–1 (75%) 0–2 — +0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1982 1772 146.5 — — — — -152 -31 -162 59.2% +0.69 3–6 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 100.6 -2.89 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1983 1990 163.1 — — — — -215 +103 -366 75.4% +2.16 4–4 (50%) 3–3 (50%) 101.7 +1.62 1981 1686 129.2 — — — — -72 — — 65.6% +0.74 5–2 (71%) 3–1 (75%) 104.4 -1.24
18 1984 1890 136.6 — — — — -79 +109 -174 61.2% +0.68 5–4 (56%) 6–2 (75%) 105.4 +3.40 1982 1742 127.0 — — — — -62 -26 — 62.7% +0.91 10–8 (56%) 8–5 (62%) 102.3 +2.77
19 1985 1849 136.5 — — — — -48 +129 — 61.5% +0.86 3–4 (43%) 4–4 (50%) 95.6 +1.23 1983 1713 125.8 — — — — +7 +31 — 51.4% -0.24 8–11 (42%) 3–4 (43%) 95.2 +0.81
20 1986 1802 139.5 — — — — -39 +157 — 55.1% +0.29 2–5 (29%) 2–3 (40%) 94.1 -1.39 1984 1760 130.7 — — — — -102 +142 -131 53.8% +0.03 18–5 (78%) 9–4 (69%) 110.1 +0.93
21 1987 1776 105.3 — — — — -39 — — 42.9% -1.29 0–1 — — -0.17 1985 1692 125.0 — — — — -1 +60 — 45.1% -0.27 8–7 (53%) 3–2 (60%) 99.8 +1.85
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1719 138.2 — — — — -26 +99 — 51.0% -0.04 5–7 (42%) 5–6 (45%) 100.4 -1.93
23 1989 1751 135.3 — — — — -31 +153 — 50.0% -0.01 7–3 (70%) 5–6 (45%) 102.1 -0.34 1987 1771 133.6 — — — — -31 -12 -185 51.6% +0.05 3–1 (75%) 0–3 (0%) 100.0 -2.61
24 1990 1612 121.4 — — — — +9 +190 — 34.5% -1.48 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 98.1 +0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1991 1542 110.6 — — — — +7 +224 +66 36.4% -1.34 0–4 (0%) 1–4 (20%) 92.0 +0.26 1989 1883 136.9 — — — — -7 -146 -254 65.2% +0.79 7–4 (64%) 3–2 (60%) 102.9 +0.24
26 1992 1608 122.1 — — — — -5 +81 +64 41.5% -0.70 7–2 (78%) 3–3 (50%) 106.9 +0.26 1990 1821 142.0 — — — — +31 -55 -173 55.4% +0.46 7–4 (64%) 5–8 (38%) 98.6 +0.41
27 1993 1476 111.1 — — — — +32 +134 — 28.8% -1.37 3–5 (38%) 2–4 (33%) 97.7 +0.66 1991 1824 132.7 — — — — +12 -70 -95 56.9% +0.19 10–4 (71%) 5–4 (56%) 105.5 +2.96
28 1994 1477 113.1 — — — — +1 +154 — 27.8% -1.83 1–1 — — -0.25 1992 1733 139.0 — — — — +2 +53 +3 49.4% +0.06 5–6 (45%) 4–5 (44%) 97.6 +1.62
29 1995 1486 104.7 — — — — -22 +124 — 43.8% -0.38 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 100.7 +1.71 1993 1682 125.0 — — — — +13 +124 +9 44.0% -0.66 4–4 (50%) 2–0 — -0.06
30 1996 1532 128.1 — — — — — +113 — 45.5% -0.36 0–2 1–2 (33%) — -0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1997 1529 108.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — -0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2022 143.4 — — — — -57 +117 -111 52.6% +0.18 42–48 (47%) 33–38 (46%) 97.5 +1.08 — 1923 138.4 — — — — -10 +27 -133 54.6% +0.19 90–63 (59%) 50–44 (53%) 104.5 +1.21

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.