H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Andrea Temesvari vs Laura Arraya H2H: 1-2
Laura Arraya holds a 2–1 lead over Andrea Temesvari in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Laura Arraya leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Laura Arraya won the 1984 Orlando quarterfinal 4-6 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
HUN
Age 60
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
PER
Age 62
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 1984* | Orlando | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Laura Arraya | 4-6 6-3 6-2 | Andrea Temesvari | Match data |
| Jan 27, 1984* | Marco Island | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Laura Arraya | 6-4 6-2 | Andrea Temesvari | Match data |
| Jan 25, 1983* | Marco Island | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Andrea Temesvari | 6-1 3-6 6-3 | Laura Arraya | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrea Temesvari | #932 | #7 | 109 | 2,021 | 185 | 178 | 51.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Laura Arraya | #192 | #14 | 51 | 1,922 | 270 | 204 | 57.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrea Temesvari | Laura Arraya | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1981 | 11–6 | 64.7% | — | 1,626 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1982 | 18–14 | 56.2% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1983 | 42–15 | 73.7% | — | 1,988 | 0 | 4 | 1981 | 19–8 | 70.4% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 4 |
| 18 | 1984 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #14 | 1,888 | 0 | 4 | 1982 | 33–17 | 66.0% | — | 1,741 | 0 | 7 |
| 19 | 1985 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,847 | 0 | 5 | 1983 | 23–23 | 50.0% | — | 1,713 | 0 | 7 |
| 20 | 1986 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #43 | 1,787 | 0 | 5 | 1984 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #34 | 1,760 | 0 | 8 |
| 21 | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #193 | 1,762 | 0 | 5 | 1985 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #63 | 1,693 | 0 | 8 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #33 | 1,718 | 0 | 8 |
| 23 | 1989 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #43 | 1,752 | 0 | 5 | 1987 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #45 | 1,770 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | 1990 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #117 | 1,612 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1991 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #159 | 1,542 | 0 | 5 | 1989 | 27–12 | 69.2% | #19 | 1,882 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 1992 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #70 | 1,616 | 0 | 5 | 1990 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #21 | 1,821 | 0 | 10 |
| 27 | 1993 | 5–20 | 20.0% | #153 | 1,480 | 0 | 5 | 1991 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #24 | 1,823 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | 1994 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #133 | 1,480 | 0 | 5 | 1992 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #45 | 1,734 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | 1995 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #90 | 1,487 | 0 | 5 | 1993 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #71 | 1,683 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | 1996 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #181 | 1,537 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #940 | 1,533 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |