H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Andrea Temesvari vs Mercedes Paz H2H: 0-3
Mercedes Paz holds a 3–0 lead over Andrea Temesvari in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Mercedes Paz leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mercedes Paz won the 1993 Stratton Mountain second round 6-2 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
HUN
Age 60
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 60
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 1993* | Stratton Mountain | WTA 250 | R64 | Hard | Mercedes Paz | 6-2 (ret.) | Andrea Temesvari | Match data |
| Apr 4, 1991* | Hilton Head | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Mercedes Paz | 6-3 6-1 | Andrea Temesvari | Match data |
| May 2, 1990* | Hamburg | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Mercedes Paz | 6-2 6-2 | Andrea Temesvari | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrea Temesvari | #932 | #7 | 109 | 2,021 | 185 | 178 | 51.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Mercedes Paz | #521 | #28 | 185 | 1,822 | 144 | 182 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrea Temesvari | Mercedes Paz | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1981 | 11–6 | 64.7% | — | 1,626 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1982 | 18–14 | 56.2% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1983 | 42–15 | 73.7% | — | 1,988 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1984 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #14 | 1,888 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1985 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,847 | 0 | 5 | 1985 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #115 | 1,526 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1986 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #43 | 1,787 | 0 | 5 | 1986 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #60 | 1,577 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #193 | 1,762 | 0 | 5 | 1987 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #88 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #44 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1989 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #43 | 1,752 | 0 | 5 | 1989 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #91 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1990 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #117 | 1,612 | 0 | 5 | 1990 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #32 | 1,776 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1991 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #159 | 1,542 | 0 | 5 | 1991 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #71 | 1,684 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1992 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #70 | 1,616 | 0 | 5 | 1992 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #107 | 1,614 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1993 | 5–20 | 20.0% | #153 | 1,480 | 0 | 5 | 1993 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #213 | 1,495 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1994 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #133 | 1,480 | 0 | 5 | 1994 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #140 | 1,476 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1995 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #90 | 1,487 | 0 | 5 | 1995 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #164 | 1,452 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1996 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #181 | 1,537 | 0 | 5 | 1996 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #124 | 1,442 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #940 | 1,533 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |