H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Andrea Temesvari vs Nana Smith H2H: 1-0
Andrea Temesvari holds a 1–0 lead over Nana Smith in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Andrea Temesvari leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Andrea Temesvari won the 1991 Roland Garros first round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
HUN
Age 60
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 55
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 1991* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Andrea Temesvari | 6-1 6-3 | Nana Smith | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrea Temesvari | #932 | #7 | 109 | 2,021 | 185 | 178 | 51.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Nana Smith | #669 | #51 | 332 | 1,649 | 65 | 114 | 36.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrea Temesvari | Nana Smith | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1981 | 11–6 | 64.7% | — | 1,626 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1982 | 18–14 | 56.2% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1983 | 42–15 | 73.7% | — | 1,988 | 0 | 4 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1984 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #14 | 1,888 | 0 | 4 | 1989 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #103 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1985 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,847 | 0 | 5 | 1990 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #113 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #43 | 1,787 | 0 | 5 | 1991 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #144 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #193 | 1,762 | 0 | 5 | 1992 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #118 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 1–11 | 8.3% | #317 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1989 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #43 | 1,752 | 0 | 5 | 1994 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #58 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1990 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #117 | 1,612 | 0 | 5 | 1995 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #128 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1991 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #159 | 1,542 | 0 | 5 | 1996 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1992 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #70 | 1,616 | 0 | 5 | 1997 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #105 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1993 | 5–20 | 20.0% | #153 | 1,480 | 0 | 5 | 1998 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1994 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #133 | 1,480 | 0 | 5 | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #134 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1995 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #90 | 1,487 | 0 | 5 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #218 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1996 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #181 | 1,537 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #940 | 1,533 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |