H2H data updated: 2026-10-27 00:00 UTC
Natalia Baudone holds a 2–0 lead over Andrea Temesvari in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Natalia Baudone leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Natalia Baudone won the 1993 Manhattan Beach round of 64 6-2 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Natalia Baudone | 6-2 3-6 6-3 | Andrea Temesvari | Match data | Aug 11, 1993* | R64 | Manhattan Beach | Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Hard |
| Natalia Baudone | 6-2 6-4 | Andrea Temesvari | Match data | Jul 23, 1992* | R32 | San Marino | Tier V → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrea Temesvari | — | #7 | 109 | 2,022 | 185 | 179 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Natalia Baudone | — | #71 | 126 | 1,682 | 38 | 58 | 39.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Andrea Temesvari | Natalia Baudone | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1981 | 11–6 | 64.7% | — | 1,624 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #224 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 18–14 | 56.2% | — | 1,771 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #179 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 42–15 | 73.7% | — | 1,990 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #101 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #14 | 1,889 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #97 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,849 | 0 | 5 | 1994 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #96 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |
| 1986 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #43 | 1,802 | 0 | 5 | 1995 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #104 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,776 | 0 | 5 | 1996 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #177 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #43 | 1,750 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #117 | 1,612 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #159 | 1,542 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #70 | 1,607 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 5–20 | 20.0% | #153 | 1,475 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #133 | 1,476 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #90 | 1,485 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1996 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #181 | 1,532 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #940 | 1,529 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Andrea Temesvari | Natalia Baudone | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 1981 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1990 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1982 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 10 | 4 | 14 | 71.4% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 1991 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1983 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 29 | 5 | 34 | 85.3% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 9 | 7 | 16 | 56.3% | 1992 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 1984 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 1993 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% |
| 1985 | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 1994 | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1986 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1995 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 1987 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 9 | 7 | 16 | 56.3% | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 3 | 9 | 12 | 25.0% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1996 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1997 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 44 | 57 | 101 | 43.6% | 89 | 62 | 151 | 58.9% | 15 | 15 | 30 | 50.0% | 26 | 43 | 69 | 37.7% | Career | 21 | 29 | 50 | 42.0% | 13 | 21 | 34 | 38.2% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Andrea Temesvari | Natalia Baudone | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 1981 | 1624 | 130.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 60.5% | +0.97 | 3–1 (75%) | 0–2 | — | -0.16 | 1990 | 1502 | 102.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 60.0% | +0.80 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.23 |
| 1982 | 1772 | 146.5 | — | — | — | — | -152 | -31 | -162 | 59.2% | +0.69 | 3–6 (33%) | 2–2 (50%) | 100.6 | -3.02 | 1991 | 1465 | 96.6 | — | — | — | — | — | +22 | — | 20.0% | -2.20 | 0–2 | — | — | -0.01 |
| 1983 | 1990 | 163.1 | — | — | — | — | -215 | +103 | -366 | 75.4% | +2.16 | 4–4 (50%) | 3–3 (50%) | 101.7 | +1.39 | 1992 | 1538 | 120.4 | — | — | — | — | +12 | +28 | — | 44.4% | -0.67 | 2–2 (50%) | 1–1 | — | +0.42 |
| 1984 | 1890 | 136.6 | — | — | — | — | -79 | +109 | -174 | 61.2% | +0.68 | 5–4 (56%) | 6–2 (75%) | 105.4 | +3.45 | 1993 | 1578 | 121.3 | — | — | — | — | +3 | -6 | — | 41.5% | -0.89 | 6–5 (55%) | 5–4 (56%) | 105.4 | -0.23 |
| 1985 | 1849 | 136.5 | — | — | — | — | -48 | +129 | — | 61.5% | +0.86 | 3–4 (43%) | 4–4 (50%) | 95.7 | +1.41 | 1994 | 1650 | 135.6 | — | — | — | — | +10 | — | — | 48.7% | -0.31 | 2–3 (40%) | 1–4 (20%) | 98.8 | -0.82 |
| 1986 | 1802 | 139.5 | — | — | — | — | -39 | +157 | — | 55.1% | +0.29 | 2–5 (29%) | 2–3 (40%) | 94.1 | -0.74 | 1995 | 1662 | 125.1 | — | — | — | — | -4 | -56 | — | 45.7% | -0.43 | 1–5 (17%) | 0–3 (0%) | 92.4 | -0.25 |
| 1987 | 1776 | 105.3 | — | — | — | — | -39 | — | — | 42.9% | -1.29 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.17 | 1996 | 1626 | 108.7 | — | — | — | — | +23 | -80 | — | 30.4% | -1.70 | 2–1 (67%) | 1–0 | — | +0.04 |
| 1989 | 1751 | 135.3 | — | — | — | — | -31 | +153 | — | 50.0% | -0.01 | 7–3 (70%) | 5–6 (45%) | 102.1 | -0.31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 1612 | 121.4 | — | — | — | — | +9 | +190 | — | 34.5% | -1.48 | 2–4 (33%) | 2–1 (67%) | 98.1 | +0.21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 1542 | 110.6 | — | — | — | — | +7 | +224 | +66 | 36.4% | -1.34 | 0–4 (0%) | 1–4 (20%) | 92.0 | +0.26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 1608 | 122.1 | — | — | — | — | -5 | +81 | +64 | 41.5% | -0.70 | 7–2 (78%) | 3–3 (50%) | 106.9 | +0.26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 1476 | 111.1 | — | — | — | — | +32 | +134 | — | 28.8% | -1.37 | 3–5 (38%) | 2–4 (33%) | 97.7 | +0.66 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 1477 | 113.1 | — | — | — | — | +1 | +154 | — | 27.8% | -1.83 | 1–1 | — | — | -0.25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 1486 | 104.7 | — | — | — | — | -22 | +124 | — | 43.8% | -0.38 | 2–2 (50%) | 2–1 (67%) | 100.7 | +1.71 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1996 | 1532 | 128.1 | — | — | — | — | — | +113 | — | 45.5% | -0.36 | 0–2 | 1–2 (33%) | — | -0.42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1997 | 1529 | 108.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 2022 | 143.4 | — | — | — | — | -57 | +117 | -111 | 52.6% | +0.18 | 42–48 (47%) | 33–38 (46%) | 97.5 | +1.11 | Career | 1682 | 127.5 | — | — | — | — | +6 | -14 | — | 42.4% | -0.76 | 13–19 (41%) | 8–12 (40%) | 97.6 | -0.65 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steffi Graf | 0 | 9 | 9 | Aug 28, 1991 | H2H |
| Raffaella Reggi Concato | 5 | 1 | 6 | Sep 22, 1989 | H2H |
| Zina Garrison | 3 | 2 | 5 | Oct 15, 1993 | H2H |
| Nicole Bradtke | 1 | 4 | 5 | Jan 14, 1993 | H2H |
| Helen Kelesi | 1 | 4 | 5 | Aug 19, 1992 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karina Habsudova | 1 | 3 | 4 | May 11, 1995 | H2H |
| Sabine Appelmans | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jan 17, 1996 | H2H |
| Linda Wild | 1 | 2 | 3 | Apr 21, 1994 | H2H |
| Steffi Graf | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jun 28, 1996 | H2H |
| Patricia Hy Boulais | 1 | 1 | 2 | Aug 16, 1995 | H2H |