H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Andrea Temesvari vs Noelle Van Lottum H2H: 1-0

Andrea Temesvari holds a 1–0 lead over Noelle Van Lottum in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Andrea Temesvari leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Andrea Temesvari won the 1995 Prague Open round of 32 6-3 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Andrea Temesvari
HUN Age 60 Right-Handed 182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Noelle Van Lottum
FRA Age 54

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Andrea Temesvari #93 6-3 6-0 Noelle Van Lottum Match data May 11, 1995* R32 Prague Open Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Andrea Temesvari #932 #7 109 2,021 185 179 50.8% 0 0 0 1 4 5
Noelle Van Lottum — — — 1,646 56 96 36.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andrea Temesvari Noelle Van Lottum
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1981 11–6 64.7% — 1,624 0 1 1988 1–1 50.0% — 1,506 0 0
16 1982 18–14 56.2% — 1,770 0 1 1989 3–2 60.0% — 1,533 0 0
17 1983 42–15 73.7% — 1,989 0 4 1990 3–2 60.0% — 1,580 0 0
18 1984 24–16 60.0% #14 1,889 0 4 1991 8–15 34.8% — 1,531 0 0
19 1985 18–12 60.0% #16 1,848 0 5 1992 17–20 45.9% — 1,610 0 1
20 1986 11–12 47.8% #43 1,801 0 5 1993 13–21 38.2% — 1,582 0 1
21 1987 1–2 33.3% #193 1,775 0 5 1994 7–12 36.8% — 1,575 0 1
22 — — — — — — — 1995 1–9 10.0% — 1,465 0 1
23 1989 18–15 54.5% #43 1,750 0 5 1996 0–2 0.0% — 1,441 0 1
24 1990 8–19 29.6% #117 1,611 0 5 1997 2–9 18.2% — 1,426 0 1
25 1991 6–14 30.0% #159 1,542 0 5 1998 1–2 33.3% — 1,428 0 1
26 1992 11–12 47.8% #70 1,607 0 5 1999 0–1 0.0% — 1,416 0 1
27 1993 5–20 20.0% #153 1,475 0 5 — — — — — — —
28 1994 2–7 22.2% #133 1,476 0 5 — — — — — — —
29 1995 6–8 42.9% #90 1,485 0 5 — — — — — — —
30 1996 4–6 40.0% #181 1,532 0 5 — — — — — — —
31 1997 0–1 0.0% #940 1,528 0 5 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Andrea Temesvari Noelle Van Lottum
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1981 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1988 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
16 1982 3 3 6 50.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1989 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1983 2 2 4 50.0% 29 5 34 85.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 9 7 16 56.3% 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0%
18 1984 5 3 8 62.5% 10 6 16 62.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 1991 2 5 7 28.6% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
19 1985 7 3 10 70.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1992 10 9 19 52.6% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
20 1986 6 5 11 54.5% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 1993 5 9 14 35.7% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
21 1987 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 3 6 9 33.3% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1 5 6 16.7% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 1989 9 7 16 56.3% 8 5 13 61.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1996 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1990 1 7 8 12.5% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1997 1 3 4 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
25 1991 2 5 7 28.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1998 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
26 1992 4 4 8 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1999 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 1993 3 9 12 25.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1994 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1995 1 2 3 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1996 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1997 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 44 57 101 43.6% 89 62 151 58.9% 15 15 30 50.0% 26 43 69 37.7% — 25 41 66 37.9% 22 40 62 35.5% 0 8 8 0.0% 9 7 16 56.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Andrea Temesvari Noelle Van Lottum
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1981 1624 130.8 — — — — — — — 60.5% +0.97 3–1 (75%) 0–2 — +0.26 1988 1507 102.1 — — — — — — — 60.0% +0.60 0–1 — — +0.28
16 1982 1771 146.3 — — — — -152 -30 -161 59.2% +0.69 3–6 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 100.6 -2.86 1989 1533 105.7 — — — — +43 — — 53.3% +0.07 3–2 (60%) 0–1 — +0.90
17 1983 1989 163.0 — — — — -215 +103 -366 75.4% +2.16 4–4 (50%) 3–3 (50%) 101.7 +1.64 1990 1581 116.6 — — — — +44 — — 60.0% -0.10 — 1–0 — +0.14
18 1984 1889 136.5 — — — — -78 +109 -173 61.2% +0.68 5–4 (56%) 6–2 (75%) 105.3 +3.39 1991 1532 111.1 — — — — +43 +16 — 38.8% -0.80 2–3 (40%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.26
19 1985 1849 136.4 — — — — -49 +129 — 61.5% +0.86 3–4 (43%) 4–4 (50%) 95.7 +1.35 1992 1610 125.2 — — — — +39 -43 — 48.1% -0.30 3–4 (43%) 5–1 (83%) 101.6 +1.96
20 1986 1802 139.4 — — — — -40 +157 — 55.1% +0.29 2–5 (29%) 2–3 (40%) 94.1 -1.37 1993 1583 123.6 — — — — +35 -30 — 40.7% -0.57 6–9 (40%) 2–6 (25%) 96.9 +0.33
21 1987 1776 105.3 — — — — -40 — — 42.9% -1.29 0–1 — — -0.17 1994 1576 110.9 — — — — +14 +11 — 40.0% -1.15 4–2 (67%) — — -0.09
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1465 92.1 — — — — +55 +58 — 11.1% -3.06 0–2 2–0 — +0.63
23 1989 1751 135.2 — — — — -31 +153 — 50.0% -0.01 7–3 (70%) 5–6 (45%) 102.1 -0.26 1996 1442 96.3 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.80 0–1 — — +0.13
24 1990 1612 121.4 — — — — +8 +190 — 34.5% -1.48 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 98.1 +0.21 1997 1427 107.1 — — — — +69 +66 +36 26.9% -1.35 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +0.01
25 1991 1542 110.6 — — — — +7 +224 +66 36.4% -1.34 0–4 (0%) 1–4 (20%) 92.0 +0.26 1998 1429 97.9 — — — — — +33 — 44.4% -0.78 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +0.19
26 1992 1607 122.1 — — — — -5 +82 +65 41.5% -0.70 7–2 (78%) 3–3 (50%) 106.9 +0.25 1999 1416 — — — — — — — — — — — — — +0.09
27 1993 1476 111.1 — — — — +31 +134 — 28.8% -1.37 3–5 (38%) 2–4 (33%) 97.7 +0.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1994 1477 113.1 — — — — +1 +154 — 27.8% -1.83 1–1 — — -0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1995 1486 104.6 — — — — -22 +124 — 43.8% -0.38 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 100.7 +1.71 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1996 1532 128.1 — — — — — +113 — 45.5% -0.36 0–2 1–2 (33%) — -0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1997 1529 108.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — -0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2021 143.3 — — — — -57 +117 -110 52.6% +0.18 42–48 (47%) 33–38 (46%) 97.5 +1.14 — 1646 119.1 — — — — +39 -1 +36 40.7% -0.78 20–29 (41%) 12–11 (52%) 99.0 +3.20

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.