H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Andrea Temesvari vs Sandra Cecchini H2H: 2-1
Andrea Temesvari holds a 2–1 lead over Sandra Cecchini in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Andrea Temesvari leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Andrea Temesvari won the 1996 Amelia Island second round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
HUN
Age 60
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 61
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 10, 1996* | Amelia Island | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Andrea Temesvari | 6-2 6-3 | Sandra Cecchini | Match data |
| Apr 18, 1985* | Amelia Island | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Sandra Cecchini | 6-0 1-6 6-4 | Andrea Temesvari | Match data |
| Feb 6, 1985* | Delray Beach | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Andrea Temesvari | 6-2 6-2 | Sandra Cecchini | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrea Temesvari | #932 | #7 | 109 | 2,021 | 185 | 178 | 51.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Sandra Cecchini | #487 | #15 | 279 | 1,937 | 299 | 215 | 58.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrea Temesvari | Sandra Cecchini | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1981 | 11–6 | 64.7% | — | 1,626 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1982 | 18–14 | 56.2% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1983 | 42–15 | 73.7% | — | 1,988 | 0 | 4 | 1982 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1984 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #14 | 1,888 | 0 | 4 | 1983 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1985 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,847 | 0 | 5 | 1984 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #49 | 1,651 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1986 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #43 | 1,787 | 0 | 5 | 1985 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #49 | 1,746 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #193 | 1,762 | 0 | 5 | 1986 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #73 | 1,635 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 36–16 | 69.2% | #18 | 1,860 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 1989 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #43 | 1,752 | 0 | 5 | 1988 | 34–14 | 70.8% | #21 | 1,845 | 0 | 7 |
| 24 | 1990 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #117 | 1,612 | 0 | 5 | 1989 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #26 | 1,798 | 0 | 8 |
| 25 | 1991 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #159 | 1,542 | 0 | 5 | 1990 | 26–14 | 65.0% | #20 | 1,815 | 0 | 9 |
| 26 | 1992 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #70 | 1,616 | 0 | 5 | 1991 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #27 | 1,776 | 0 | 10 |
| 27 | 1993 | 5–20 | 20.0% | #153 | 1,480 | 0 | 5 | 1992 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #34 | 1,824 | 0 | 11 |
| 28 | 1994 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #133 | 1,480 | 0 | 5 | 1993 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #56 | 1,725 | 0 | 11 |
| 29 | 1995 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #90 | 1,487 | 0 | 5 | 1994 | 28–16 | 63.6% | #33 | 1,840 | 0 | 11 |
| 30 | 1996 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #181 | 1,537 | 0 | 5 | 1995 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #108 | 1,661 | 0 | 11 |
| 31 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #940 | 1,533 | 0 | 5 | 1996 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #80 | 1,629 | 0 | 11 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #206 | 1,610 | 0 | 11 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #200 | 1,556 | 0 | 11 |