H2H data updated: 2026-10-25 00:00 UTC

Andrea Temesvari vs Sandy Collins H2H: 2-0

Andrea Temesvari holds a 2–0 lead over Sandy Collins in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Andrea Temesvari leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Andrea Temesvari won the 1991 Charleston Open round of 64 6-3 6-3.

HUN Age 60 Right-Handed 182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Andrea Temesvari #112 6-3 6-3 Sandy Collins Match data Apr 3, 1991* R64 Charleston Open WTA 1000 Clay
Andrea Temesvari 6-2 6-2 Sandy Collins Match data Feb 25, 1983* R16 Oakland WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Andrea Temesvari — #7 109 2,022 185 179 50.8% 0 0 0 1 4 5
Sandy Collins — — — 1,824 90 152 37.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andrea Temesvari Sandy Collins
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1973 1–1 50.0% — 1,497 0 0
15 1981 11–6 64.7% — 1,624 0 1 — — — — — — —
16 1982 18–14 56.2% — 1,771 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1983 42–15 73.7% — 1,990 0 4 — — — — — — —
18 1984 24–16 60.0% #14 1,889 0 4 — — — — — — —
19 1985 18–12 60.0% #16 1,849 0 5 1978 7–7 50.0% — 1,541 0 0
20 1986 11–12 47.8% #43 1,802 0 5 1979 2–7 22.2% — 1,498 0 0
21 1987 1–2 33.3% — 1,776 0 5 1980 10–12 45.5% — 1,632 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 1981 25–20 55.6% — 1,787 0 0
23 1989 18–15 54.5% #43 1,750 0 5 1982 14–21 40.0% — 1,734 0 0
24 1990 8–19 29.6% #117 1,612 0 5 1983 13–20 39.4% — 1,684 0 0
25 1991 6–14 30.0% #159 1,542 0 5 1984 9–18 33.3% — 1,600 0 0
26 1992 11–12 47.8% #70 1,607 0 5 1985 1–9 10.0% — 1,508 0 0
27 1993 5–20 20.0% #153 1,475 0 5 1986 0–1 0.0% — 1,500 0 0
28 1994 2–7 22.2% #133 1,476 0 5 1987 0–4 0.0% — 1,453 0 0
29 1995 6–8 42.9% #90 1,485 0 5 1988 3–5 37.5% — 1,491 0 0
30 1996 4–6 40.0% #181 1,532 0 5 1989 2–8 20.0% — 1,473 0 0
31 1997 0–1 0.0% #940 1,529 0 5 1990 1–9 10.0% — 1,421 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 1991 1–5 16.7% — 1,406 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 1992 1–2 33.3% — 1,413 0 0
34 — — — — — — — 1993 0–1 0.0% — 1,407 0 0
35 — — — — — — — 1994 0–2 0.0% — 1,393 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Andrea Temesvari Sandy Collins
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1981 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1982 3 3 6 50.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1983 2 2 4 50.0% 29 5 34 85.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 9 7 16 56.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1984 5 3 8 62.5% 10 6 16 62.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1985 7 3 10 70.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1978 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 1986 6 5 11 54.5% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 1979 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1987 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 4 6 10 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 4 5 9 44.4% 11 6 17 64.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 7 14 50.0%
23 1989 9 7 16 56.3% 8 5 13 61.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1982 3 2 5 60.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 7 12 19 36.8%
24 1990 1 7 8 12.5% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1983 5 6 11 45.5% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
25 1991 2 5 7 28.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1984 7 6 13 53.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 6 6 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
26 1992 4 4 8 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1985 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1993 3 9 12 25.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1986 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 1994 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1987 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
29 1995 1 2 3 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1988 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 1996 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1989 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
31 1997 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1990 0 5 5 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 44 57 101 43.6% 89 62 151 58.9% 15 15 30 50.0% 26 43 69 37.7% — 34 56 90 37.8% 20 32 52 38.5% 6 24 30 20.0% 26 38 64 40.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Andrea Temesvari Sandy Collins
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 1497 99.4 — — — — — — — 50.0% 0.00 — — — +0.62
15 1981 1624 130.8 — — — — — — — 60.5% +0.97 3–1 (75%) 0–2 — -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1982 1772 146.5 — — — — -152 -31 -162 59.2% +0.69 3–6 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 100.6 -3.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1983 1990 163.1 — — — — -215 +103 -366 75.4% +2.16 4–4 (50%) 3–3 (50%) 101.7 +1.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1984 1890 136.6 — — — — -79 +109 -174 61.2% +0.68 5–4 (56%) 6–2 (75%) 105.4 +3.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1985 1849 136.5 — — — — -48 +129 — 61.5% +0.86 3–4 (43%) 4–4 (50%) 95.7 +1.41 1978 1541 118.0 — — — — +85 — — 56.3% +0.66 0–4 (0%) — — +1.24
20 1986 1802 139.5 — — — — -39 +157 — 55.1% +0.29 2–5 (29%) 2–3 (40%) 94.1 -0.74 1979 1498 107.8 — — — — — -8 — 30.0% -0.55 0–2 0–1 — +1.31
21 1987 1776 105.3 — — — — -39 — — 42.9% -1.29 0–1 — — -0.17 1980 1632 129.0 — — — — +7 — — 48.9% +0.22 3–2 (60%) 1–2 (33%) 101.5 -0.07
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1787 138.1 — — — — -48 -82 -188 52.6% -0.04 6–3 (67%) 5–4 (56%) 104.5 -1.55
23 1989 1751 135.3 — — — — -31 +153 — 50.0% -0.01 7–3 (70%) 5–6 (45%) 102.1 -0.31 1982 1734 126.6 — — — — -17 -44 — 38.7% -0.91 6–3 (67%) 2–4 (33%) 103.2 -0.37
24 1990 1612 121.4 — — — — +9 +190 — 34.5% -1.48 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 98.1 +0.21 1983 1685 124.3 — — — — +34 -29 -111 40.8% -0.63 2–3 (40%) 1–5 (17%) 95.5 -0.09
25 1991 1542 110.6 — — — — +7 +224 +66 36.4% -1.34 0–4 (0%) 1–4 (20%) 92.0 +0.26 1984 1601 117.8 — — — — +112 -8 -91 34.4% -0.97 4–5 (44%) 1–2 (33%) 98.9 -0.22
26 1992 1608 122.1 — — — — -5 +81 +64 41.5% -0.70 7–2 (78%) 3–3 (50%) 106.9 +0.26 1985 1508 99.3 — — — — +102 — — 18.2% -2.36 0–2 1–0 — +0.69
27 1993 1476 111.1 — — — — +32 +134 — 28.8% -1.37 3–5 (38%) 2–4 (33%) 97.7 +0.66 1986 1500 101.5 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 — — -0.03
28 1994 1477 113.1 — — — — +1 +154 — 27.8% -1.83 1–1 — — -0.25 1987 1454 94.2 — — — — — — — 11.1% -2.56 0–1 — — +0.23
29 1995 1486 104.7 — — — — -22 +124 — 43.8% -0.38 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 100.7 +1.71 1988 1491 114.4 — — — — +85 — — 42.1% -0.63 1–2 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 97.4 -0.02
30 1996 1532 128.1 — — — — — +113 — 45.5% -0.36 0–2 1–2 (33%) — -0.42 1989 1473 103.5 — — — — +56 — — 23.8% -1.71 0–1 2–0 — +0.43
31 1997 1529 108.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — -0.29 1990 1422 95.6 — — — — +39 +112 — 17.4% -2.65 1–2 (33%) — — +0.17
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1406 104.6 — — — — +39 — — 21.4% -2.00 1–1 0–1 — +0.16
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1413 104.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.83 — 0–1 — +0.18
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1408 95.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.07
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1394 103.0 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–2 1–1 — -0.05
Career — 2022 143.4 — — — — -57 +117 -111 52.6% +0.18 42–48 (47%) 33–38 (46%) 97.5 +1.11 — 1825 126.0 — — — — +28 -36 -128 39.2% -0.75 24–34 (41%) 15–24 (38%) 92.7 +1.07

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.