H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Andrea Tiezzi vs Sheila Mcinerney H2H: 0-2
Sheila Mcinerney holds a 2–0 lead over Andrea Tiezzi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Sheila Mcinerney leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sheila Mcinerney won the 1982 Sao Paulo round-robin match 6-3 3-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 1982 | Sao Paulo | WTA 250 | RR | Clay | Sheila Mcinerney | 6-3 3-6 6-4 | Andrea Tiezzi | Match data |
| Apr 3, 1981* | Rio de Janeiro | WTA 250 | R16 | — | Sheila Mcinerney | 6-2 6-2 | Andrea Tiezzi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrea Tiezzi | — | — | — | 1,584 | 22 | 29 | 43.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sheila Mcinerney | — | — | — | 1,585 | 27 | 39 | 40.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrea Tiezzi | Sheila Mcinerney | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1980 | 5–3 | 62.5% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1981 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1982 | 8–7 | 53.3% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1983 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1987 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 3–9 | 25.0% | — | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1988 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 10–7 | 58.8% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1989 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1990 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |