H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Angeles Montolio vs Sandra Cacic H2H: 1-1
Angeles Montolio and Sandra Cacic are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Angeles Montolio leads 1–0 on clay, while Sandra Cacic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Angeles Montolio won the 2001 Roland Garros first round 6-1 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 50
Right-Handed
157 cm / 5'2"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 51
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 2001* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Angeles Montolio | 6-1 6-0 | Sandra Cacic | Match data |
| Aug 31, 1994* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Sandra Cacic | 7-5 6-3 | Angeles Montolio | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Angeles Montolio | #601 | #22 | 1,109 | 1,818 | 86 | 94 | 47.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Sandra Cacic | #409 | #39 | 548 | 1,730 | 58 | 96 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Angeles Montolio | Sandra Cacic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #310 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1994 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #103 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #76 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1995 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #172 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #54 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1996 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #110 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #114 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1997 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #260 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #78 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #60 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1999 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #60 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #82 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2000 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #55 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #188 | 1,518 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2001 | 36–22 | 62.1% | #23 | 1,729 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,514 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2002 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #134 | 1,519 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #117 | 1,583 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #322 | 1,570 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #395 | 1,552 | 0 | 1 |