H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Angelica Gavaldon vs Beverly Bowes H2H: 2-0
Angelica Gavaldon holds a 2–0 lead over Beverly Bowes in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Angelica Gavaldon leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Angelica Gavaldon won the 1993 Oklahoma fourth round 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
MEX
Age 52
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 60
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 1993* | Oklahoma | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Angelica Gavaldon | 6-2 7-5 | Beverly Bowes | Match data |
| Jan 6, 1993* | Brisbane | WTA 500 | R64 | Hard | Angelica Gavaldon | 6-2 6-1 | Beverly Bowes | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Angelica Gavaldon | #434 | #34 | 237 | 1,733 | 72 | 109 | 39.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Beverly Bowes | #597 | #49 | 16 | 1,678 | 69 | 120 | 36.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Angelica Gavaldon | Beverly Bowes | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1988 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #264 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1989 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1990 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1991 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #242 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1992 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #142 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #161 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1993 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #64 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #170 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #119 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #100 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #36 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #75 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #219 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #62 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #107 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #101 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #697 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #147 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #379 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #156 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2000 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #261 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #113 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #130 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #426 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |