H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Angelica Gavaldon vs Donna Faber H2H: 2-1
Angelica Gavaldon holds a 2–1 lead over Donna Faber in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Angelica Gavaldon leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Angelica Gavaldon won the 1993 San Juan third round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
MEX
Age 52
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 55
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 1993* | San Juan | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Angelica Gavaldon | 6-4 6-1 | Donna Faber | Match data |
| Jan 30, 1992* | Auckland | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Donna Faber | 7-6 6-0 | Angelica Gavaldon | Match data |
| Aug 29, 1990* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Angelica Gavaldon | 6-3 6-2 | Donna Faber | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Angelica Gavaldon | #434 | #34 | 237 | 1,733 | 72 | 109 | 39.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Donna Faber | #227 | #55 | 19 | 1,718 | 68 | 97 | 41.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Angelica Gavaldon | Donna Faber | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1988 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #264 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1989 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #218 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1990 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #131 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1991 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #242 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1992 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #142 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #84 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1993 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #64 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #99 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #119 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #116 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #36 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #227 | 1,431 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #219 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1997 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #107 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #697 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #379 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2000 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #261 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |