H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Angelica Gavaldon vs Jo Durie H2H: 1-0

Angelica Gavaldon holds a 1–0 lead over Jo Durie in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Angelica Gavaldon leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Angelica Gavaldon won the 1992 Indian Wells Open round of 64 6-2 6-7 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Angelica Gavaldon
MEX Age 52 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Jo Durie
GBR Age 66 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Angelica Gavaldon #258 6-2 6-7 7-5 Jo Durie #62 Match data Feb 24, 1992 R64 Indian Wells Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Angelica Gavaldon #434 #34 237 1,735 75 111 40.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jo Durie #302 #5 31 2,101 311 263 54.2% 0 0 0 1 8 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Angelica Gavaldon Jo Durie
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1988 1–3 25.0% #264 1,499 0 0 1975 1–1 50.0% — 1,498 0 0
15 1989 2–4 33.3% #191 1,501 0 0 1976 5–6 45.5% — 1,503 0 0
16 1990 16–16 50.0% #51 1,601 0 0 1977 11–7 61.1% — 1,602 0 0
17 1991 1–6 14.3% #242 1,556 0 0 1978 15–9 62.5% — 1,619 0 1
18 1992 5–10 33.3% #142 1,577 0 0 1979 15–8 65.2% — 1,713 0 3
19 1993 19–20 48.7% #64 1,613 0 0 1980 21–14 60.0% — 1,733 0 4
20 1994 9–16 36.0% #119 1,605 0 0 1981 30–14 68.2% — 1,859 0 7
21 1995 17–17 50.0% #36 1,677 0 0 1982 25–20 55.6% — 1,841 0 7
22 1996 3–11 21.4% #219 1,593 0 0 1983 47–18 72.3% #6 2,094 0 9
23 1997 1–5 16.7% #107 1,527 0 0 1984 16–15 51.6% #24 1,890 0 9
24 1998 0–1 0.0% #697 1,521 0 0 1985 17–19 47.2% #26 1,800 0 9
25 1999 0–1 0.0% #379 1,515 0 0 1986 24–17 58.5% #24 1,841 0 9
26 2000 1–1 50.0% #261 1,526 0 0 1987 10–17 37.0% #73 1,741 0 9
27 — — — — — — — 1988 19–19 50.0% #60 1,702 0 9
28 — — — — — — — 1989 8–13 38.1% #117 1,621 0 9
29 — — — — — — — 1990 13–13 50.0% #64 1,673 0 9
30 — — — — — — — 1991 15–18 45.5% #62 1,708 0 9
31 — — — — — — — 1992 13–16 44.8% #59 1,688 0 9
32 — — — — — — — 1993 4–12 25.0% #192 1,563 0 9
33 — — — — — — — 1994 1–4 20.0% #348 1,555 0 9
34 — — — — — — — 1995 1–3 25.0% #292 1,548 0 9

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Angelica Gavaldon Jo Durie
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1988 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1975 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
15 1989 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9%
16 1990 13 10 23 56.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1977 — — — — 5 4 9 55.6% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
17 1991 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1978 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
18 1992 3 6 9 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1979 — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
19 1993 12 11 23 52.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 1980 — — — — 13 6 19 68.4% 8 4 12 66.7% 0 4 4 0.0%
20 1994 7 9 16 43.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1981 4 2 6 66.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 3 3 6 50.0%
21 1995 12 9 21 57.1% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1982 4 3 7 57.1% 5 3 8 62.5% 10 6 16 62.5% 6 8 14 42.9%
22 1996 3 10 13 23.1% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1983 12 3 15 80.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 16 4 20 80.0% 10 8 18 55.6%
23 1997 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 2 4 6 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1%
24 1998 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 4 7 11 36.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 1999 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 10 6 16 62.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 7 6 13 53.8%
26 2000 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 9 9 18 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 2 3 5 40.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 6 9 15 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 7 4 11 63.6% 0 3 3 0.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 7 9 16 43.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 3 7 10 30.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 4 5 20.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 — — — — — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
Career — 55 71 126 43.7% 13 21 34 38.2% 5 9 14 35.7% 2 10 12 16.7% — 73 75 148 49.3% 57 45 102 55.9% 103 72 175 58.9% 50 65 115 43.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Angelica Gavaldon Jo Durie
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1988 1500 105.9 — — — — +36 — — 33.3% -1.44 0–1 0–1 — +0.09 1975 1499 100.0 — — — — — — — 40.0% +0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.55
15 1989 1501 104.0 — — — — +24 — — 35.7% -1.14 1–1 1–0 — +0.22 1976 1503 107.8 — — — — +73 — +94 54.2% +0.71 1–3 (25%) 1–0 — +3.14
16 1990 1601 123.4 — — — — +41 -70 -31 48.0% -0.39 7–4 (64%) 2–2 (50%) 105.8 +1.11 1977 1602 121.5 — — — — — -35 +40 56.1% +0.71 4–1 (80%) 0–1 — +2.47
17 1991 1557 107.9 — — — — +21 — — 23.5% -1.59 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.31 1978 1619 121.0 — — — — +18 — -9 57.4% +0.50 5–1 (83%) 1–2 (33%) 104.3 +2.99
18 1992 1578 119.9 — — — — -6 -9 — 29.0% -1.29 2–1 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 100.5 -0.47 1979 1714 129.5 — — — — — -76 -94 58.5% +0.36 6–1 (86%) 6–2 (75%) 110.0 +0.87
19 1993 1613 127.0 — — — — +4 -19 -41 49.4% -0.03 5–6 (45%) 3–4 (43%) 99.4 +0.85 1980 1734 122.7 — — — — -184 -10 -56 61.7% +0.60 5–8 (38%) 4–1 (80%) 99.6 +0.68
20 1994 1605 119.4 — — — — +7 -4 — 35.3% -0.88 3–0 (100%) 1–6 (14%) 100.2 -0.02 1981 1859 136.3 — — — — -159 -77 -116 60.8% +0.60 12–2 (86%) 4–1 (80%) 113.5 -0.98
21 1995 1678 132.9 — — — — 0 -76 -137 48.6% -0.23 4–2 (67%) 4–1 (80%) 106.9 +0.35 1982 1841 141.1 — — — — -59 -75 -37 55.1% +0.21 8–9 (47%) 2–4 (33%) 97.4 -2.62
22 1996 1593 116.6 — — — — +13 — — 25.8% -1.71 1–2 (33%) 0–3 (0%) 96.1 -0.12 1983 2095 159.8 — — — — -75 -184 -99 69.3% +1.31 7–5 (58%) 3–2 (60%) 104.6 -5.64
23 1997 1528 94.3 — — — — +25 +52 — 28.6% -1.79 0–2 — — +0.66 1984 1891 136.3 — — — — +11 -59 +84 49.3% +0.53 7–4 (64%) 1–5 (17%) 95.2 +0.18
24 1998 1522 — — — — — — — — — — — — — -0.13 1985 1800 133.3 — — — — +15 -48 +123 48.8% +0.06 7–7 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 96.7 -1.37
25 1999 1515 100.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.20 1986 1842 140.0 — — — — +2 -79 +45 55.7% +0.21 11–6 (65%) 8–3 (73%) 105.1 -3.56
26 2000 1526 104.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.40 1–0 — — +0.09 1987 1741 134.1 — — — — +30 -30 +108 41.0% -0.69 2–5 (29%) 2–2 (50%) 96.3 -2.72
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1703 127.8 — — — — -1 -16 +119 49.4% -0.10 6–5 (55%) 8–4 (67%) 101.9 -0.26
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1622 126.0 — — — — -8 — +201 41.3% -0.67 1–3 (25%) 3–2 (60%) 98.1 +0.38
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1674 130.7 — — — — -60 — +193 51.7% +0.48 2–6 (25%) 3–5 (38%) 93.4 +0.04
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1709 132.3 — — — — +4 -111 +94 45.5% -0.12 6–7 (46%) 1–2 (33%) 100.5 +1.02
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1689 130.7 — — — — -48 -50 +162 50.0% -0.09 3–7 (30%) 4–1 (80%) 99.1 +0.39
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1563 107.8 — — — — -11 — — 35.9% -0.74 3–6 (33%) 0–4 (0%) 92.1 +1.33
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1555 106.0 — — — — — — +191 33.3% -1.42 0–2 — — -0.60
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1548 107.6 — — — — — — +141 40.0% -0.60 0–2 1–0 — -0.20
Career — 1735 127.2 — — — — +13 -28 -69 41.0% -0.69 25–21 (54%) 14–21 (40%) 101.4 +1.14 — 2101 141.6 — — — — -26 -67 +43 53.6% +0.27 97–90 (52%) 53–46 (54%) 102.6 -0.68

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.