H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Angelica Gavaldon vs Kimiko Date Krumm H2H: 0-1

Kimiko Date Krumm holds a 1–0 lead over Angelica Gavaldon in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kimiko Date Krumm leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kimiko Date Krumm won the 1996 Australian Open first round 6-2 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Angelica Gavaldon
MEX Age 52 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Kimiko Date Krumm
Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 17, 1996* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Kimiko Date Krumm 6-2 6-0 Angelica Gavaldon #39 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Angelica Gavaldon #434 #34 237 1,733 72 109 39.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Kimiko Date Krumm — — — 2,091 241 188 56.2% 0 1 0 3 4 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Angelica Gavaldon Kimiko Date Krumm
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1988 1–3 25.0% #264 1,498 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1989 2–4 33.3% #191 1,500 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1990 16–16 50.0% #51 1,601 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1991 1–6 14.3% #242 1,556 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1992 3–9 25.0% #142 1,535 0 0 1989 6–5 54.5% — 1,562 0 0
19 1993 19–20 48.7% #64 1,604 0 0 1990 10–7 58.8% — 1,664 0 0
20 1994 9–16 36.0% #119 1,601 0 0 1991 12–11 52.2% — 1,725 0 0
21 1995 17–17 50.0% #36 1,676 0 0 1992 26–13 66.7% — 1,867 0 1
22 1996 2–10 16.7% #219 1,586 0 0 1993 25–11 69.4% — 1,956 0 2
23 1997 1–5 16.7% #107 1,522 0 0 1994 32–12 72.7% — 1,987 0 4
24 1998 0–1 0.0% #697 1,517 0 0 1995 39–12 76.5% — 2,029 0 5
25 1999 0–1 0.0% #379 1,510 0 0 1996 31–13 70.5% — 2,071 0 7
26 2000 1–1 50.0% #261 1,522 0 0 — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% — 2,042 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2009 6–11 35.3% — 1,841 0 8
39 — — — — — — — 2010 19–18 51.4% — 1,814 0 8
40 — — — — — — — 2011 7–24 22.6% — 1,567 0 8
41 — — — — — — — 2012 2–14 12.5% — 1,454 0 8
42 — — — — — — — 2013 12–15 44.4% — 1,575 0 8
43 — — — — — — — 2014 11–14 44.0% — 1,597 0 8
44 — — — — — — — 2015 3–6 33.3% — 1,574 0 8
46 — — — — — — — 2017 0–1 0.0% — 1,564 0 8