H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Angelica Gavaldon vs Leila Meskhi H2H: 0-2
Leila Meskhi holds a 2–0 lead over Angelica Gavaldon in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Leila Meskhi leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Leila Meskhi won the 1993 Amelia Island fourth round 6-4 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
MEX
Age 52
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
GEO
Age 58
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 9, 1993* | Amelia Island | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Leila Meskhi | 6-4 6-0 | Angelica Gavaldon | Match data |
| Jan 15, 1992* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Leila Meskhi | 6-2 6-2 | Angelica Gavaldon | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Angelica Gavaldon | #434 | #34 | 237 | 1,733 | 72 | 109 | 39.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Leila Meskhi | #903 | #12 | 72 | 2,001 | 192 | 119 | 61.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Angelica Gavaldon | Leila Meskhi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1988 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #264 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1989 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1990 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1991 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #242 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1992 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #142 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1993 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #64 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 11–7 | 61.1% | #46 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #119 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #36 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #30 | 1,794 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1996 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #219 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 38–14 | 73.1% | #19 | 1,928 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1997 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #107 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 30–14 | 68.2% | #15 | 1,937 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #697 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #22 | 1,939 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #379 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #37 | 1,874 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2000 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #261 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #34 | 1,843 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #141 | 1,834 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #838 | 1,748 | 0 | 5 |