H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Angelica Gavaldon vs Meredith Mcgrath H2H: 1-1
Angelica Gavaldon and Meredith Mcgrath are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Angelica Gavaldon leads 1–0 on clay, while Meredith Mcgrath leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Angelica Gavaldon won the 1995 Hamburg third round 6-4 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
MEX
Age 52
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 55
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 4, 1995* | Hamburg | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Angelica Gavaldon | 6-4 7-6 | Meredith Mcgrath | Match data |
| Jun 13, 1990* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Meredith Mcgrath | 6-1 6-4 | Angelica Gavaldon | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Angelica Gavaldon | #434 | #34 | 237 | 1,733 | 72 | 109 | 39.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Meredith Mcgrath | #315 | #18 | 898 | 1,927 | 90 | 84 | 51.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Angelica Gavaldon | Meredith Mcgrath | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1988 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #264 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1989 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1990 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1991 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #242 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #400 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1992 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #142 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #93 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1993 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #64 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #28 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #119 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #164 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #36 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #780 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #219 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #107 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #39 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #697 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #62 | 1,742 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #379 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 19–9 | 67.9% | #26 | 1,917 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2000 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #261 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #318 | 1,874 | 0 | 3 |