H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Angelica Gavaldon vs Nana Smith H2H: 0-1

Nana Smith holds a 1–0 lead over Angelica Gavaldon in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nana Smith leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nana Smith won the 1991 Australian Open round of 128 7-5 1-6 8-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Angelica Gavaldon
MEX Age 52 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Nana Smith
JPN Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nana Smith #112 7-5 1-6 8-6 Angelica Gavaldon #50 Match data Jan 16, 1991* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Angelica Gavaldon #434 #34 237 1,735 75 111 40.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nana Smith #669 #51 332 1,649 65 114 36.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Angelica Gavaldon Nana Smith
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1988 1–3 25.0% #264 1,499 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1989 2–4 33.3% #191 1,501 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1990 16–16 50.0% #51 1,601 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1991 1–6 14.3% #242 1,556 0 0 1988 0–1 0.0% #201 1,495 0 0
18 1992 5–10 33.3% #142 1,577 0 0 1989 7–11 38.9% #103 1,587 0 0
19 1993 19–20 48.7% #64 1,613 0 0 1990 9–16 36.0% #113 1,541 0 0
20 1994 9–16 36.0% #119 1,605 0 0 1991 7–13 35.0% #144 1,528 0 0
21 1995 17–17 50.0% #36 1,677 0 0 1992 4–4 50.0% #118 1,557 0 0
22 1996 3–11 21.4% #219 1,593 0 0 1993 1–11 8.3% #317 1,444 0 0
23 1997 1–5 16.7% #107 1,527 0 0 1994 9–7 56.2% #58 1,578 0 0
24 1998 0–1 0.0% #697 1,521 0 0 1995 7–13 35.0% #128 1,544 0 0
25 1999 0–1 0.0% #379 1,515 0 0 1996 13–13 50.0% #70 1,601 0 0
26 2000 1–1 50.0% #261 1,526 0 0 1997 4–12 25.0% #105 1,542 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 1998 4–8 33.3% #117 1,538 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 1999 0–3 0.0% #134 1,521 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2000 0–2 0.0% #218 1,499 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Angelica Gavaldon Nana Smith
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1988 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1989 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1990 13 10 23 56.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1991 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1988 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1992 3 6 9 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 5 9 14 35.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
19 1993 12 11 23 52.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 1990 6 11 17 35.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
20 1994 7 9 16 43.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1991 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
21 1995 12 9 21 57.1% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
22 1996 3 10 13 23.1% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1993 0 9 9 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1997 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 8 5 13 61.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1998 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 6 10 16 37.5% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1999 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 13 10 23 56.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2000 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 4 10 14 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 55 71 126 43.7% 13 21 34 38.2% 5 9 14 35.7% 2 10 12 16.7% — 52 84 136 38.2% 1 7 8 12.5% 4 13 17 23.5% 8 10 18 44.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Angelica Gavaldon Nana Smith
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1988 1500 105.9 — — — — +36 — — 33.3% -1.44 0–1 0–1 — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1989 1501 104.0 — — — — +24 — — 35.7% -1.14 1–1 1–0 — +0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1990 1601 123.4 — — — — +41 -70 -31 48.0% -0.39 7–4 (64%) 2–2 (50%) 105.8 +1.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1991 1557 107.9 — — — — +21 — — 23.5% -1.59 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.31 1988 1496 102.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.11
18 1992 1578 119.9 — — — — -6 -9 — 29.0% -1.29 2–1 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 100.5 -0.47 1989 1588 139.3 — — — — +6 — — 45.7% -0.22 3–7 (30%) 1–2 (33%) 98.4 -0.50
19 1993 1613 127.0 — — — — +4 -19 -41 49.4% -0.03 5–6 (45%) 3–4 (43%) 99.4 +0.85 1990 1541 113.3 — — — — +33 — -2 38.9% -0.89 1–5 (17%) 5–4 (56%) 96.2 +1.12
20 1994 1605 119.4 — — — — +7 -4 — 35.3% -0.88 3–0 (100%) 1–6 (14%) 100.2 -0.02 1991 1529 118.1 — — — — +48 — — 37.0% -0.87 3–3 (50%) 0–1 — +0.61
21 1995 1678 132.9 — — — — 0 -76 -137 48.6% -0.23 4–2 (67%) 4–1 (80%) 106.9 +0.35 1992 1557 108.5 — — — — +41 — — 52.6% +0.32 3–2 (60%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.97
22 1996 1593 116.6 — — — — +13 — — 25.8% -1.71 1–2 (33%) 0–3 (0%) 96.1 -0.12 1993 1444 90.0 — — — — +16 — — 14.8% -2.37 1–2 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 96.7 +0.20
23 1997 1528 94.3 — — — — +25 +52 — 28.6% -1.79 0–2 — — +0.66 1994 1579 128.2 — — — — -1 — — 55.3% +0.37 3–3 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.70
24 1998 1522 — — — — — — — — — — — — — -0.13 1995 1545 112.9 — — — — 0 — -88 40.8% -0.65 3–6 (33%) 3–2 (60%) 98.5 +0.66
25 1999 1515 100.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.20 1996 1602 121.7 — — — — +24 — — 47.7% -0.11 8–5 (62%) 3–1 (75%) 107.0 +1.18
26 2000 1526 104.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.40 1–0 — — +0.09 1997 1543 108.6 — — — — +33 — — 34.3% -1.40 1–4 (20%) 2–3 (40%) 95.7 -0.08
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1538 116.7 — — — — +45 — — 40.0% -1.00 2–4 (33%) 2–0 — -0.13
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1522 112.5 — — — — +37 — — 14.3% -1.86 0–1 0–1 — -0.63
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1499 99.7 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.60 0–1 — — -0.03
Career — 1735 127.2 — — — — +13 -28 -69 41.0% -0.69 25–21 (54%) 14–21 (40%) 101.4 +1.14 — 1650 124.0 — — — — +23 — -45 40.4% -0.69 28–43 (39%) 20–20 (50%) 98.5 +2.21

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.