H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Angelica Gavaldon vs Natalia Medvedeva H2H: 1-0
Angelica Gavaldon holds a 1–0 lead over Natalia Medvedeva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Angelica Gavaldon leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Angelica Gavaldon won the 1994 Manhattan Beach second round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
MEX
Age 52
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
UKR
Age 54
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 1994* | Manhattan Beach | WTA 250 | R64 | Hard | Angelica Gavaldon | 6-2 6-2 | Natalia Medvedeva | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Angelica Gavaldon | #434 | #34 | 237 | 1,733 | 72 | 109 | 39.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Natalia Medvedeva | #387 | #23 | 295 | 1,881 | 111 | 111 | 50.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Angelica Gavaldon | Natalia Medvedeva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1988 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #264 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1989 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #197 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1990 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #317 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1991 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #242 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #67 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1992 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #142 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #56 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1993 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #64 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #83 | 1,683 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1994 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #119 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #41 | 1,708 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1995 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #36 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 24–13 | 64.9% | #23 | 1,870 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1996 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #219 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #57 | 1,770 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1997 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #107 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #79 | 1,694 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #697 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #88 | 1,682 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #379 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #388 | 1,661 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2000 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #261 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |