H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Angelica Gavaldon vs Patricia Hy Boulais H2H: 0-2

Patricia Hy Boulais holds a 2–0 lead over Angelica Gavaldon in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Patricia Hy Boulais leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Patricia Hy Boulais won the 1994 Quebec City round of 32 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Angelica Gavaldon
MEX Age 52 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Patricia Hy Boulais
CAN Age 61 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Patricia Hy Boulais 6-4 6-4 Angelica Gavaldon #101 Match data Nov 3, 1994* R32 Quebec City Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Carpet
Patricia Hy Boulais 6-3 6-2 Angelica Gavaldon #122 Match data Sep 1, 1994* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Angelica Gavaldon #434 #34 237 1,735 75 111 40.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Patricia Hy Boulais — — — 1,906 142 165 46.3% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Angelica Gavaldon Patricia Hy Boulais
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1988 1–3 25.0% #264 1,499 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1989 2–4 33.3% #191 1,501 0 0 1981 0–1 0.0% — 1,493 0 0
16 1990 16–16 50.0% #51 1,601 0 0 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,477 0 0
17 1991 1–6 14.3% #242 1,556 0 0 1983 7–8 46.7% — 1,546 0 0
18 1992 5–10 33.3% #142 1,577 0 0 1984 0–2 0.0% — 1,522 0 0
19 1993 19–20 48.7% #64 1,613 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1994 9–16 36.0% #119 1,605 0 0 1986 8–1 88.9% — 1,633 0 1
21 1995 17–17 50.0% #36 1,677 0 0 1987 9–15 37.5% — 1,594 0 1
22 1996 3–11 21.4% #219 1,593 0 0 1988 0–5 0.0% — 1,548 0 1
23 1997 1–5 16.7% #107 1,527 0 0 1989 1–4 20.0% — 1,514 0 1
24 1998 0–1 0.0% #697 1,521 0 0 1990 7–7 50.0% — 1,573 0 1
25 1999 0–1 0.0% #379 1,515 0 0 1991 18–17 51.4% — 1,704 0 1
26 2000 1–1 50.0% #261 1,526 0 0 1992 22–16 57.9% — 1,876 0 1
27 — — — — — — — 1993 21–15 58.3% — 1,851 0 1
28 — — — — — — — 1994 15–16 48.4% — 1,756 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 1995 11–14 44.0% — 1,691 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 1996 10–16 38.5% — 1,687 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 1997 12–19 38.7% — 1,663 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 1998 1–8 11.1% — 1,573 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Angelica Gavaldon Patricia Hy Boulais
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1988 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1989 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
16 1990 13 10 23 56.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1982 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1991 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1983 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
18 1992 3 6 9 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1993 12 11 23 52.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1994 7 9 16 43.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1986 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — 5 0 5 100.0%
21 1995 12 9 21 57.1% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1987 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 1996 3 10 13 23.1% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1988 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1997 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1998 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
25 1999 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 13 11 24 54.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2000 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 8 5 13 61.5% 10 6 16 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 10 9 19 52.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 11 9 20 55.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 5 8 13 38.5% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1 7 8 12.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 4 10 14 28.6% 3 5 8 37.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 0 3 3 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
Career — 55 71 126 43.7% 13 21 34 38.2% 5 9 14 35.7% 2 10 12 16.7% — 72 85 157 45.9% 28 39 67 41.8% 27 23 50 54.0% 15 18 33 45.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Angelica Gavaldon Patricia Hy Boulais
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1988 1500 105.9 — — — — +36 — — 33.3% -1.44 0–1 0–1 — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1989 1501 104.0 — — — — +24 — — 35.7% -1.14 1–1 1–0 — +0.22 1981 1493 98.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.07
16 1990 1601 123.4 — — — — +41 -70 -31 48.0% -0.39 7–4 (64%) 2–2 (50%) 105.8 +1.11 1982 1477 98.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.18
17 1991 1557 107.9 — — — — +21 — — 23.5% -1.59 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.31 1983 1546 117.5 — — — — +51 — +83 46.9% +0.12 1–1 1–1 — +0.93
18 1992 1578 119.9 — — — — -6 -9 — 29.0% -1.29 2–1 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 100.5 -0.47 1984 1523 101.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–2 0–1 — +0.06
19 1993 1613 127.0 — — — — +4 -19 -41 49.4% -0.03 5–6 (45%) 3–4 (43%) 99.4 +0.85 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1994 1605 119.4 — — — — +7 -4 — 35.3% -0.88 3–0 (100%) 1–6 (14%) 100.2 -0.02 1986 1633 110.5 — — — — +41 — — 69.6% +1.65 5–0 (100%) 1–2 (33%) — +2.61
21 1995 1678 132.9 — — — — 0 -76 -137 48.6% -0.23 4–2 (67%) 4–1 (80%) 106.9 +0.35 1987 1595 115.4 — — — — +48 — +10 37.5% -0.93 5–3 (63%) 1–6 (14%) 97.9 -0.17
22 1996 1593 116.6 — — — — +13 — — 25.8% -1.71 1–2 (33%) 0–3 (0%) 96.1 -0.12 1988 1548 99.0 — — — — +29 — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–2 — -0.27
23 1997 1528 94.3 — — — — +25 +52 — 28.6% -1.79 0–2 — — +0.66 1989 1515 91.9 — — — — +9 — — 20.0% -2.30 — — — +0.31
24 1998 1522 — — — — — — — — — — — — — -0.13 1990 1574 118.5 — — — — +7 — — 51.7% +0.41 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.67
25 1999 1515 100.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.20 1991 1704 141.1 — — — — -20 -265 +2 50.0% +0.11 6–4 (60%) 2–1 (67%) 104.8 -0.45
26 2000 1526 104.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.40 1–0 — — +0.09 1992 1877 155.6 — — — — -71 -231 -109 56.3% +0.35 7–3 (70%) 2–2 (50%) 107.4 -1.82
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1852 141.8 — — — — -46 -170 +3 57.0% +0.38 6–3 (67%) 4–3 (57%) 105.0 -1.32
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1756 132.7 — — — — +24 -99 — 52.4% +0.25 2–3 (40%) 3–1 (75%) 99.3 -0.60
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1691 125.6 — — — — +15 -27 — 50.0% -0.18 3–9 (25%) 3–2 (60%) 93.7 +0.06
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1687 132.9 — — — — -41 -41 +161 40.0% -0.73 4–4 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 98.0 -1.41
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1664 129.6 — — — — -71 +1 +194 40.3% -0.58 8–7 (53%) 2–5 (29%) 99.0 -0.88
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1574 92.9 — — — — -25 -9 — 26.1% -2.00 1–4 (20%) 1–1 — -0.04
Career — 1735 127.2 — — — — +13 -28 -69 41.0% -0.69 25–21 (54%) 14–21 (40%) 101.4 +1.14 — 1906 138.1 — — — — -10 -116 +43 47.1% -0.18 50–44 (53%) 22–33 (40%) 98.3 -0.72

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.