H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Angelica Gavaldon vs Raffaella Reggi Concato H2H: 0-2
Raffaella Reggi Concato holds a 2–0 lead over Angelica Gavaldon in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Raffaella Reggi Concato leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Raffaella Reggi Concato won the 1990 Indianapolis fourth round 3-6 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
MEX
Age 52
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
Age 60
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 1990* | Indianapolis | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Raffaella Reggi Concato | 3-6 6-2 7-5 | Angelica Gavaldon | Match data |
| May 30, 1990* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Raffaella Reggi Concato | 1-6 7-6(4) 6-2 | Angelica Gavaldon | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Angelica Gavaldon | #434 | #34 | 237 | 1,733 | 72 | 109 | 39.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Raffaella Reggi Concato | — | — | — | 1,930 | 256 | 176 | 59.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Angelica Gavaldon | Raffaella Reggi Concato | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1988 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #264 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | 1989 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,431 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1990 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,424 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1991 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #242 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 21–20 | 51.2% | — | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1992 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #142 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 17–14 | 54.8% | — | 1,754 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1993 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #64 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 26–19 | 57.8% | — | 1,783 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1994 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #119 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 31–20 | 60.8% | — | 1,896 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 1995 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #36 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 39–21 | 65.0% | — | 1,903 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1996 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #219 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 27–15 | 64.3% | — | 1,872 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1997 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #107 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 39–22 | 63.9% | — | 1,863 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #697 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 31–16 | 66.0% | — | 1,818 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #379 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 11–11 | 50.0% | — | 1,708 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2000 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #261 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 13–11 | 54.2% | — | 1,719 | 0 | 5 |