H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Angelica Gavaldon vs Rosalyn Fairbank H2H: 2-2
Angelica Gavaldon and Rosalyn Fairbank are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Rosalyn Fairbank leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Angelica Gavaldon won the 1995 Wimbledon second round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
MEX
Age 52
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 65
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 1995* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Angelica Gavaldon | 6-1 6-2 | Rosalyn Fairbank | Match data |
| Feb 14, 1991* | Chicago | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Rosalyn Fairbank | 6-4 6-2 | Angelica Gavaldon | Match data |
| Aug 10, 1990* | San Diego | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Rosalyn Fairbank | 4-6 7-5 6-0 | Angelica Gavaldon | Match data |
| Aug 3, 1989* | San Diego | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Angelica Gavaldon | 2-6 6-4 6-3 | Rosalyn Fairbank | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Angelica Gavaldon | #434 | #34 | 237 | 1,733 | 72 | 109 | 39.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Rosalyn Fairbank | #325 | #15 | 51 | 1,933 | 336 | 309 | 52.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Angelica Gavaldon | Rosalyn Fairbank | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1988 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #264 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1989 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1990 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1991 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #242 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1992 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #142 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 17–10 | 63.0% | — | 1,720 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1993 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #64 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 22–20 | 52.4% | — | 1,681 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #119 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 15–22 | 40.5% | — | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #36 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 32–21 | 60.4% | — | 1,904 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #219 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 24–19 | 55.8% | — | 1,920 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1997 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #107 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #32 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #697 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #38 | 1,806 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #379 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #28 | 1,824 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2000 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #261 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #36 | 1,756 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #37 | 1,775 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 27–18 | 60.0% | #22 | 1,846 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #24 | 1,789 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #90 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #63 | 1,766 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #284 | 1,704 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #261 | 1,599 | 0 | 1 |