H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Angelica Gavaldon vs Samantha Smith H2H: 0-1

Samantha Smith holds a 1–0 lead over Angelica Gavaldon in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Samantha Smith leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Samantha Smith won the 1990 Eastbourne Open round of 64 6-4 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Angelica Gavaldon
MEX Age 52 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Samantha Smith
GBR Age 54 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Samantha Smith #169 6-4 6-1 Angelica Gavaldon #60 Match data Jun 20, 1990* R64 Eastbourne Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Angelica Gavaldon #434 #34 237 1,735 75 111 40.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Samantha Smith #439 #55 504 1,626 22 52 29.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Angelica Gavaldon Samantha Smith
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1988 1–3 25.0% #264 1,499 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1989 2–4 33.3% #191 1,501 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1990 16–16 50.0% #51 1,601 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1991 1–6 14.3% #242 1,556 0 0 1989 0–1 0.0% #274 1,494 0 0
18 1992 5–10 33.3% #142 1,577 0 0 1990 8–12 40.0% #122 1,559 0 0
19 1993 19–20 48.7% #64 1,613 0 0 1991 3–11 21.4% #127 1,496 0 0
20 1994 9–16 36.0% #119 1,605 0 0 1992 1–2 33.3% #353 1,502 0 0
21 1995 17–17 50.0% #36 1,677 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1996 3–11 21.4% #219 1,593 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 1997 1–5 16.7% #107 1,527 0 0 1995 0–1 0.0% #294 1,496 0 0
24 1998 0–1 0.0% #697 1,521 0 0 1996 1–4 20.0% #141 1,510 0 0
25 1999 0–1 0.0% #379 1,515 0 0 1997 2–5 28.6% #130 1,504 0 0
26 2000 1–1 50.0% #261 1,526 0 0 1998 6–5 54.5% #65 1,590 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 1999 1–10 9.1% #230 1,483 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 2000 0–1 0.0% #292 1,476 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Angelica Gavaldon Samantha Smith
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1988 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1989 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1990 13 10 23 56.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1991 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
18 1992 3 6 9 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 1 2 3 33.3% 5 7 12 41.7% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
19 1993 12 11 23 52.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 1991 1 2 3 33.3% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1994 7 9 16 43.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1992 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1995 12 9 21 57.1% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1996 3 10 13 23.1% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1997 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1998 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 1999 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
26 2000 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 55 71 126 43.7% 13 21 34 38.2% 5 9 14 35.7% 2 10 12 16.7% — 4 15 19 21.1% 7 17 24 29.2% 10 17 27 37.0% 1 3 4 25.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Angelica Gavaldon Samantha Smith
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1988 1500 105.9 — — — — +36 — — 33.3% -1.44 0–1 0–1 — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1989 1501 104.0 — — — — +24 — — 35.7% -1.14 1–1 1–0 — +0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1990 1601 123.4 — — — — +41 -70 -31 48.0% -0.39 7–4 (64%) 2–2 (50%) 105.8 +1.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1991 1557 107.9 — — — — +21 — — 23.5% -1.59 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.31 1989 1494 97.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.09
18 1992 1578 119.9 — — — — -6 -9 — 29.0% -1.29 2–1 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 100.5 -0.47 1990 1560 119.1 — — — — +9 -17 +26 38.3% -1.13 5–2 (71%) 1–0 — -0.18
19 1993 1613 127.0 — — — — +4 -19 -41 49.4% -0.03 5–6 (45%) 3–4 (43%) 99.4 +0.85 1991 1497 107.3 — — — — +40 -11 +95 31.3% -1.16 0–4 (0%) 1–0 — +0.43
20 1994 1605 119.4 — — — — +7 -4 — 35.3% -0.88 3–0 (100%) 1–6 (14%) 100.2 -0.02 1992 1503 104.1 — — — — — — — 37.5% -1.00 1–1 — — +0.26
21 1995 1678 132.9 — — — — 0 -76 -137 48.6% -0.23 4–2 (67%) 4–1 (80%) 106.9 +0.35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1996 1593 116.6 — — — — +13 — — 25.8% -1.71 1–2 (33%) 0–3 (0%) 96.1 -0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1997 1528 94.3 — — — — +25 +52 — 28.6% -1.79 0–2 — — +0.66 1995 1497 103.0 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 0–1 — -0.07
24 1998 1522 — — — — — — — — — — — — — -0.13 1996 1511 113.9 — — — — +21 — — 27.3% -2.18 0–1 1–0 — -0.63
25 1999 1515 100.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.20 1997 1505 103.1 — — — — +24 — +57 33.3% -1.60 0–1 1–1 — +0.10
26 2000 1526 104.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.40 1–0 — — +0.09 1998 1591 120.6 — — — — — — +157 50.0% -0.33 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — 0.00
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1483 99.5 — — — — -18 — +148 16.7% -1.71 0–2 0–3 (0%) — +0.23
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1477 98.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.07
Career — 1735 127.2 — — — — +13 -28 -69 41.0% -0.69 25–21 (54%) 14–21 (40%) 101.4 +1.14 — 1626 115.7 — — — — +11 -15 +106 33.3% -1.26 8–14 (36%) 5–5 (50%) 97.7 -0.03

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.