H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Angelica Gavaldon vs Zina Garrison H2H: 1-1

Angelica Gavaldon and Zina Garrison are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Angelica Gavaldon leads 1–0 on clay, while Zina Garrison leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Angelica Gavaldon won the 1993 Hilton Head round of 32 3-6 6-0 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Angelica Gavaldon
MEX Age 52 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Zina Garrison
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Angelica Gavaldon #84 3-6 6-0 6-2 Zina Garrison #18 Match data Apr 1, 1993* R32 Hilton Head Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Zina Garrison #4 6-4 6-0 Angelica Gavaldon #59 Match data Aug 30, 1990* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Angelica Gavaldon #434 #34 237 1,735 75 111 40.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Zina Garrison #318 #4 134 2,146 584 270 68.4% 0 0 0 2 13 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Angelica Gavaldon Zina Garrison
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1988 1–3 25.0% #264 1,499 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1989 2–4 33.3% #191 1,501 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1990 16–16 50.0% #51 1,601 0 0 1980 2–2 50.0% — 1,529 0 1
17 1991 1–6 14.3% #242 1,556 0 0 1981 5–5 50.0% — 1,569 0 1
18 1992 5–10 33.3% #142 1,577 0 0 1982 23–15 60.5% — 1,853 0 1
19 1993 19–20 48.7% #64 1,613 0 0 1983 38–18 67.9% #10 1,990 0 1
20 1994 9–16 36.0% #119 1,605 0 0 1984 47–20 70.1% #9 2,012 0 2
21 1995 17–17 50.0% #36 1,677 0 0 1985 51–18 73.9% #8 2,033 0 4
22 1996 3–11 21.4% #219 1,593 0 0 1986 48–22 68.6% #11 2,000 0 5
23 1997 1–5 16.7% #107 1,527 0 0 1987 44–17 72.1% #9 1,988 0 7
24 1998 0–1 0.0% #697 1,521 0 0 1988 52–21 71.2% #9 2,043 0 7
25 1999 0–1 0.0% #379 1,515 0 0 1989 60–15 80.0% #4 2,135 0 10
26 2000 1–1 50.0% #261 1,526 0 0 1990 48–18 72.7% #10 2,041 0 11
27 — — — — — — — 1991 37–18 67.3% #12 1,963 0 11
28 — — — — — — — 1992 36–20 64.3% #18 1,915 0 12
29 — — — — — — — 1993 43–19 69.4% #14 1,995 0 14
30 — — — — — — — 1994 24–16 60.0% #24 1,888 0 14
31 — — — — — — — 1995 25–16 61.0% #22 1,868 0 15
32 — — — — — — — 1996 1–10 9.1% #273 1,711 0 15

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Angelica Gavaldon Zina Garrison
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1988 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1989 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1990 13 10 23 56.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1980 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
17 1991 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1981 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 3 3 6 50.0%
18 1992 3 6 9 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1982 5 4 9 55.6% 7 3 10 70.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 0 3 3 0.0%
19 1993 12 11 23 52.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 1983 6 2 8 75.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 13 5 18 72.2% 8 5 13 61.5%
20 1994 7 9 16 43.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1984 11 3 14 78.6% 15 6 21 71.4% 6 5 11 54.5% 15 6 21 71.4%
21 1995 12 9 21 57.1% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1985 14 3 17 82.4% 12 4 16 75.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 14 7 21 66.7%
22 1996 3 10 13 23.1% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1986 21 5 26 80.8% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 16 10 26 61.5%
23 1997 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1987 15 5 20 75.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 8 1 9 88.9% 13 7 20 65.0%
24 1998 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 28 10 38 73.7% 13 6 19 68.4% 9 3 12 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
25 1999 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 30 6 36 83.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 12 3 15 80.0% 15 4 19 78.9%
26 2000 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 18 6 24 75.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 12 2 14 85.7% 12 6 18 66.7%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 18 8 26 69.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 10 5 15 66.7%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 18 6 24 75.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 8 7 15 53.3%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 22 8 30 73.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 12 5 17 70.6%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 12 7 19 63.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 7 6 13 53.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 8 4 12 66.7%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0%
Career — 55 71 126 43.7% 13 21 34 38.2% 5 9 14 35.7% 2 10 12 16.7% — 225 86 311 72.3% 90 58 148 60.8% 123 41 164 75.0% 142 83 225 63.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Angelica Gavaldon Zina Garrison
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1988 1500 105.9 — — — — +36 — — 33.3% -1.44 0–1 0–1 — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1989 1501 104.0 — — — — +24 — — 35.7% -1.14 1–1 1–0 — +0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1990 1601 123.4 — — — — +41 -70 -31 48.0% -0.39 7–4 (64%) 2–2 (50%) 105.8 +1.11 1980 1529 117.3 — — — — +48 — — 55.6% +0.56 0–1 — — +0.25
17 1991 1557 107.9 — — — — +21 — — 23.5% -1.59 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.31 1981 1570 122.3 — — — — +74 — — 54.5% +0.55 2–2 (50%) — — +1.08
18 1992 1578 119.9 — — — — -6 -9 — 29.0% -1.29 2–1 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 100.5 -0.47 1982 1854 155.0 — — — — -185 -170 -50 57.5% +0.46 7–4 (64%) 4–3 (57%) 108.3 -5.41
19 1993 1613 127.0 — — — — +4 -19 -41 49.4% -0.03 5–6 (45%) 3–4 (43%) 99.4 +0.85 1983 1991 154.6 — — — — -125 -109 -50 65.0% +0.87 7–2 (78%) 7–6 (54%) 108.1 -2.31
20 1994 1605 119.4 — — — — +7 -4 — 35.3% -0.88 3–0 (100%) 1–6 (14%) 100.2 -0.02 1984 2013 157.3 — — — — +15 -96 -60 65.1% +1.21 12–7 (63%) 7–2 (78%) 105.1 +0.09
21 1995 1678 132.9 — — — — 0 -76 -137 48.6% -0.23 4–2 (67%) 4–1 (80%) 106.9 +0.35 1985 2033 160.2 — — — — +49 -57 -42 67.7% +1.56 15–5 (75%) 4–11 (27%) 96.5 +1.14
22 1996 1593 116.6 — — — — +13 — — 25.8% -1.71 1–2 (33%) 0–3 (0%) 96.1 -0.12 1986 2001 159.2 — — — — +95 -126 -21 66.0% +1.22 10–7 (59%) 8–6 (57%) 98.3 -1.84
23 1997 1528 94.3 — — — — +25 +52 — 28.6% -1.79 0–2 — — +0.66 1987 1988 166.8 — — — — +36 -60 +137 69.6% +1.50 7–6 (54%) 6–4 (60%) 100.4 -2.77
24 1998 1522 — — — — — — — — — — — — — -0.13 1988 2043 162.0 — — — — +19 -89 +75 68.1% +1.43 9–7 (56%) 7–3 (70%) 101.1 -4.39
25 1999 1515 100.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.20 1989 2135 170.0 — — — — +59 -212 -20 76.4% +2.14 8–7 (53%) 10–3 (77%) 101.5 -0.28
26 2000 1526 104.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.40 1–0 — — +0.09 1990 2041 161.7 — — — — +14 -144 +213 68.5% +1.50 11–10 (52%) 4–5 (44%) 95.8 -1.68
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1964 153.9 — — — — +30 -134 +240 63.1% +0.89 9–5 (64%) 3–3 (50%) 98.7 +1.03
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1915 157.8 — — — — +39 -53 +312 62.5% +0.84 9–7 (56%) 5–3 (63%) 97.2 +0.17
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1996 160.6 — — — — +22 -217 +199 67.4% +1.23 8–7 (53%) 8–4 (67%) 100.2 +0.22
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1889 145.3 — — — — +24 -186 +259 54.3% +0.13 10–4 (71%) 7–2 (78%) 102.6 -0.25
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1868 147.9 — — — — +29 -240 +311 61.2% +0.83 6–10 (38%) 5–3 (63%) 91.6 +1.45
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1712 111.8 — — — — +23 — — 20.8% -1.50 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — +0.20
Career — 1735 127.2 — — — — +13 -28 -69 41.0% -0.69 25–21 (54%) 14–21 (40%) 101.4 +1.14 — 2146 164.6 — — — — +27 -112 +91 65.2% +1.16 131–94 (58%) 86–59 (59%) 101.4 -1.56

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.