H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Aniko Kapros vs Lenka Nemeckova H2H: 1-0
Aniko Kapros holds a 1–0 lead over Lenka Nemeckova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Aniko Kapros leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Aniko Kapros won the 2001 Casablanca quarterfinal 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
HUN
Age 42
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 50
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 2001* | Casablanca | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Aniko Kapros | 6-4 6-2 | Lenka Nemeckova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aniko Kapros | #1,173 | #45 | 722 | 1,691 | 35 | 40 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Lenka Nemeckova | #787 | #72 | 337 | 1,570 | 27 | 46 | 37.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Aniko Kapros | Lenka Nemeckova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #578 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2001 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #110 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2002 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #107 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2003 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #92 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2004 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #85 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #150 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2005 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #245 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #83 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #235 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #142 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #108 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #250 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #155 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #136 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #190 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #146 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #221 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |