H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Aniko Kapros vs Marissa Irvin H2H: 1-1

Aniko Kapros and Marissa Irvin are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Aniko Kapros won the 2002 Memphis Classic round of 32 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Aniko Kapros
HUN Age 42 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Marissa Irvin
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Aniko Kapros #116 6-4 6-4 Marissa Irvin #67 Match data Feb 20, 2002* R32 Memphis Classic Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Marissa Irvin #93 6-1 4-6 6-3 Aniko Kapros #111 Match data Sep 13, 2001* R32 Waikoloa Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Aniko Kapros #1,173 #45 722 1,692 35 40 46.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Marissa Irvin #854 #51 652 1,603 37 80 31.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Aniko Kapros Marissa Irvin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2000 0–1 0.0% #578 1,487 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2001 10–7 58.8% #110 1,550 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2002 4–6 40.0% #107 1,547 0 0 1998 0–1 0.0% #412 1,495 0 0
19 2003 6–5 54.5% #92 1,604 0 0 1999 0–2 0.0% #131 1,487 0 0
20 2004 12–14 46.2% #85 1,599 0 0 2000 4–7 36.4% #88 1,505 0 0
21 2005 3–5 37.5% #245 1,571 0 0 2001 8–14 36.4% #64 1,571 0 0
22 2006 0–1 0.0% #235 1,553 0 0 2002 9–18 33.3% #77 1,572 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 2003 3–11 21.4% #141 1,502 0 0
24 2008 0–1 0.0% #250 1,536 0 0 2004 7–13 35.0% #72 1,499 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 2005 6–14 30.0% #128 1,505 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Aniko Kapros Marissa Irvin
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2000 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2001 2 4 6 33.3% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2002 1 2 3 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — 1998 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2003 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1999 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2004 9 11 20 45.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2000 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 2005 1 4 5 20.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 2001 6 7 13 46.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
22 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 8 11 19 42.1% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1 8 9 11.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 5 10 15 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 2 8 10 20.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
Career — 17 27 44 38.6% 13 10 23 56.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — 26 52 78 33.3% 10 17 27 37.0% 1 8 9 11.1% 0 3 3 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Aniko Kapros Marissa Irvin
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2000 1487 100.0 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 0–1 — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2001 1551 104.2 — — — — -31 +49 — 50.0% -0.07 7–1 (88%) 4–1 (80%) — +1.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2002 1547 110.3 — — — — -40 +55 — 41.7% -0.50 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — +0.18 1998 1496 101.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -3.00 0–1 — — -0.04
19 2003 1604 116.7 +0.29 +1.15 1.040 50.9% -57 — +56 52.4% +0.43 0–1 0–1 — +0.32 1999 1487 102.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.30
20 2004 1600 118.4 -1.80 +0.89 0.966 49.1% -49 +18 — 46.7% -0.17 6–4 (60%) 0–2 — -0.75 2000 1505 117.5 — — — — +18 — — 39.3% -0.64 3–3 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 102.1 0.00
21 2005 1571 102.6 — — — — -60 +77 — 35.3% -1.18 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +0.02 2001 1572 122.9 — — — — -1 -33 — 38.9% -0.74 5–5 (50%) 3–1 (75%) 103.9 -1.30
22 2006 1554 94.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — +0.06 2002 1572 129.6 — — — — +40 -62 — 37.1% -0.89 3–7 (30%) 2–2 (50%) 99.1 -1.41
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1503 104.4 — — — — +12 +35 — 30.3% -1.57 1–4 (20%) 3–4 (43%) 95.8 +0.46
24 2008 1536 100.0 -2.44 -3.60 0.885 46.9% — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–1 1–0 — +0.09 2004 1500 126.9 — — — — -10 +82 — 38.6% -0.23 1–5 (17%) 3–8 (27%) 93.1 +0.59
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1506 112.6 — — — — -46 +67 — 36.2% -1.38 2–5 (29%) 3–1 (75%) 100.0 -0.56
Career — 1692 113.9 -1.16 +0.60 0.983 49.5% -47 +49 +56 45.3% -0.32 16–12 (57%) 7–7 (50%) 102.6 +1.76 — 1604 125.7 — — — — +5 +17 — 36.4% -0.97 15–30 (33%) 16–17 (48%) 97.1 -2.19

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.