H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Aniko Kapros vs Silvija Talaja H2H: 1-1
Aniko Kapros and Silvija Talaja are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Aniko Kapros won the 2004 Budapest third round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
HUN
Age 42
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 48
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2004* | Budapest | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Aniko Kapros | 6-3 6-4 | Silvija Talaja | Match data |
| Jul 11, 2002* | Brussels | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Silvija Talaja | 7-5 6-1 | Aniko Kapros | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aniko Kapros | #1,173 | #45 | 722 | 1,691 | 35 | 40 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Silvija Talaja | #1,214 | #18 | 1,376 | 1,811 | 130 | 151 | 46.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Aniko Kapros | Silvija Talaja | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #288 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #578 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #251 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2001 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #110 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #280 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2002 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #107 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 9–4 | 69.2% | #106 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2003 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #92 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #199 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2004 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #85 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #85 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2005 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #245 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #29 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #235 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #29 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,543 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #250 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #74 | 1,559 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #93 | 1,547 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #114 | 1,543 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #190 | 1,507 | 0 | 2 |