H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Anke Huber vs Alexia Dechaume Balleret H2H: 1-1

Anke Huber and Alexia Dechaume Balleret are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Anke Huber leads 1–0 on clay, while Alexia Dechaume Balleret leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Alexia Dechaume Balleret won the 1991 Schenectady quarterfinal 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anke Huber
GER Age 51 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Alexia Dechaume Balleret
FRA Age 56 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Alexia Dechaume Balleret 6-3 6-4 Anke Huber #16 Match data Aug 24, 1991* QF Schenectady Tier V → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Anke Huber #21 6-1 6-3 Alexia Dechaume Balleret Match data May 8, 1991* R64 Italian Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anke Huber #18 #4 2,721 2,122 398 205 66.0% 0 1 0 4 7 12
Alexia Dechaume Balleret — — — 1,738 127 181 41.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anke Huber Alexia Dechaume Balleret
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1989 1–1 50.0% #199 1,518 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1990 14–9 60.9% #37 1,708 0 1 — — — — — — —
16 1991 30–13 69.8% #14 1,959 0 2 1986 1–1 50.0% — 1,516 0 0
17 1992 31–16 66.0% #11 1,973 0 2 1987 6–10 37.5% — 1,539 0 0
18 1993 41–15 73.2% #10 2,058 0 3 1988 7–13 35.0% — 1,532 0 0
19 1994 38–16 70.4% #12 2,030 0 6 1989 5–14 26.3% — 1,491 0 0
20 1995 41–15 73.2% #10 2,082 0 7 1990 13–11 54.2% — 1,600 0 0
21 1996 47–16 74.6% #6 2,031 0 10 1991 14–18 43.8% — 1,645 0 0
22 1997 34–24 58.6% #13 1,969 0 10 1992 21–19 52.5% — 1,733 0 0
23 1998 25–18 58.1% #21 1,900 0 10 1993 0–1 0.0% — 1,710 0 0
24 1999 32–26 55.2% #16 1,872 0 10 1994 12–13 48.0% — 1,704 0 0
25 2000 29–16 64.4% #19 1,895 0 12 1995 6–15 28.6% — 1,585 0 0
26 2001 35–20 63.6% #18 1,834 0 12 1996 7–13 35.0% — 1,576 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 1997 15–15 50.0% — 1,620 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 1998 9–19 32.1% — 1,592 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 1999 11–18 37.9% — 1,571 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2000 0–1 0.0% — 1,555 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anke Huber Alexia Dechaume Balleret
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1989 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1990 8 4 12 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1991 15 6 21 71.4% 9 4 13 69.2% 3 1 4 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1986 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1992 10 5 15 66.7% 9 5 14 64.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 10 5 15 66.7% 1987 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
18 1993 16 7 23 69.6% 16 4 20 80.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 1988 0 2 2 0.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
19 1994 11 6 17 64.7% 13 4 17 76.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 13 5 18 72.2% 1989 2 6 8 25.0% 3 8 11 27.3% — — — — — — — —
20 1995 19 8 27 70.4% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 12 3 15 80.0% 1990 4 4 8 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1996 21 8 29 72.4% 8 4 12 66.7% 7 1 8 87.5% 11 3 14 78.6% 1991 10 11 21 47.6% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
22 1997 17 10 27 63.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 10 7 17 58.8% 1992 12 11 23 52.2% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1998 17 10 27 63.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 8 7 15 53.3% 1993 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1999 19 13 32 59.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 8 16 50.0% 1994 7 8 15 46.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 2000 7 10 17 41.2% 18 4 22 81.8% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1995 5 9 14 35.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2001 16 9 25 64.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 3 1 4 75.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 1996 3 7 10 30.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 9 8 17 52.9% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 3 9 12 25.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 3 6 9 33.3% 3 8 11 27.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 177 97 274 64.6% 96 45 141 68.1% 31 13 44 70.5% 94 50 144 65.3% — 59 86 145 40.7% 51 67 118 43.2% 10 16 26 38.5% 7 12 19 36.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anke Huber Alexia Dechaume Balleret
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1989 1518 106.7 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.34 1–1 1–0 — -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1990 1709 138.4 — — — — +14 -175 — 57.7% +0.90 4–4 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 101.7 -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1991 1959 161.7 — — — — -23 -215 -283 67.0% +1.21 6–5 (55%) 4–3 (57%) 104.1 -0.97 1986 1517 105.3 — — — — — — — 50.0% 0.00 — — — +0.01
17 1992 1974 163.5 — — — — +13 -112 -289 64.1% +1.16 7–6 (54%) 5–4 (56%) 102.2 -1.03 1987 1539 124.4 — — — — +28 +26 — 42.1% 0.00 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — +1.23
18 1993 2059 162.3 — — — — -40 -16 -298 66.1% +0.98 13–4 (76%) 7–6 (54%) 107.2 -1.91 1988 1532 116.8 — — — — — +56 +5 40.0% -1.02 1–4 (20%) 1–0 — +0.04
19 1994 2030 158.8 — — — — -9 +18 — 64.5% +1.13 12–6 (67%) 6–4 (60%) 102.9 +0.55 1989 1492 117.1 — — — — -9 +59 — 36.4% -1.11 0–6 (0%) 2–2 (50%) 92.8 +0.68
20 1995 2083 168.0 — — — — +12 -34 -316 66.2% +1.32 13–4 (76%) 6–5 (55%) 103.3 -1.78 1990 1601 116.0 — — — — -64 -22 -5 51.7% -0.12 6–4 (60%) 6–1 (86%) 108.0 +1.41
21 1996 2032 160.5 — — — — +30 -42 -104 66.2% +1.29 17–6 (74%) 7–10 (41%) 99.9 +2.81 1991 1645 125.3 — — — — -25 -89 -62 49.3% +0.04 1–8 (11%) 1–1 — -0.53
22 1997 1969 163.8 — — — — +39 -72 -51 57.6% +0.58 12–10 (55%) 5–6 (45%) 96.0 -1.85 1992 1733 139.7 — — — — -43 -63 — 52.2% +0.31 6–8 (43%) 4–4 (50%) 101.1 -0.96
23 1998 1900 158.7 — — — — +4 — — 55.0% +0.39 9–7 (56%) 3–7 (30%) 93.2 -0.86 1993 1710 99.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — 0.00
24 1999 1872 155.9 — — — — +5 -59 -11 52.6% +0.17 11–10 (52%) 5–5 (50%) 97.6 -1.51 1994 1705 133.1 — — — — -51 +24 — 51.9% +0.11 2–4 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.41
25 2000 1896 145.4 — — — — -95 +65 +31 60.0% +0.73 10–7 (59%) 7–7 (50%) 99.9 +0.44 1995 1585 113.1 — — — — +35 +34 — 22.5% -1.58 1–1 0–2 — -0.50
26 2001 1834 151.0 — — — — +12 +62 +138 62.2% +0.78 8–9 (47%) 8–4 (67%) 99.3 +0.22 1996 1576 120.4 — — — — +9 +78 — 35.7% -1.19 1–3 (25%) 3–1 (75%) 100.2 -0.64
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1621 127.1 — — — — +3 +66 — 52.8% -0.01 4–8 (33%) 3–5 (38%) 95.3 +0.82
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1592 121.9 — — — — -25 +71 +3 36.8% -0.87 5–7 (42%) 3–5 (38%) 98.4 -1.11
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1572 115.6 — — — — +3 +13 +1 40.9% -0.94 3–5 (38%) 4–4 (50%) 98.3 -0.59
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1556 89.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — +0.12
Career — 2123 165.4 — — — — +2 -32 -124 61.8% +0.88 123–79 (61%) 66–63 (51%) 100.5 -1.02 — 1739 130.0 — — — — -16 +20 -8 44.0% -0.45 32–62 (34%) 28–29 (49%) 94.0 +0.13

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.