H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Anke Huber vs Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy H2H: 5-1

Anke Huber holds a 5–1 lead over Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Anke Huber leads 2–0 on carpet, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Anke Huber won the 1996 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix round of 16 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anke Huber
GER Age 51 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
5 – 1
6 main-draw meetings
Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy
NED Age 55 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Anke Huber #5 6-1 6-4 Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #11 Match data Oct 11, 1996* R16 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Anke Huber #12 6-3 6-3 Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #14 Match data Nov 13, 1995 SF WTA Finals WTA Finals Carpet
Anke Huber #11 6-4 6-4 Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #16 Match data Jun 1, 1995* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #28 7-6 6-3 Anke Huber #11 Match data May 14, 1994* SF Berlin Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Anke Huber #10 6-3 6-0 Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #32 Match data Aug 19, 1993* R32 Canadian Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Anke Huber #11 6-1 3-6 6-4 Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #29 Match data Oct 23, 1992* R32 Brighton Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anke Huber #18 #4 2,721 2,122 398 205 66.0% 0 1 0 4 7 12
Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #919 #9 1,672 2,025 298 222 57.3% 0 0 0 0 7 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anke Huber Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1989 1–1 50.0% #199 1,518 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1990 14–9 60.9% #37 1,708 0 1 1986 0–1 0.0% — 1,490 0 0
16 1991 30–13 69.8% #14 1,959 0 2 1987 5–6 45.5% #149 1,515 0 0
17 1992 31–16 66.0% #11 1,973 0 2 1988 21–18 53.8% #40 1,675 0 0
18 1993 41–15 73.2% #10 2,058 0 3 1989 15–22 40.5% #83 1,599 0 0
19 1994 38–16 70.4% #12 2,030 0 6 1990 18–17 51.4% #43 1,676 0 0
20 1995 41–15 73.2% #10 2,082 0 7 1991 24–19 55.8% #30 1,799 0 1
21 1996 47–16 74.6% #6 2,031 0 10 1992 31–21 59.6% #33 1,822 0 2
22 1997 34–24 58.6% #13 1,969 0 10 1993 26–20 56.5% #40 1,791 0 3
23 1998 25–18 58.1% #21 1,900 0 10 1994 44–21 67.7% #15 1,886 0 3
24 1999 32–26 55.2% #16 1,872 0 10 1995 37–15 71.2% #13 1,971 0 5
25 2000 29–16 64.4% #19 1,895 0 12 1996 37–19 66.1% #12 1,910 0 6
26 2001 35–20 63.6% #18 1,834 0 12 1997 34–25 57.6% #15 1,856 0 7
27 — — — — — — — 1998 3–10 23.1% #188 1,674 0 7
28 — — — — — — — 1999 0–1 0.0% #893 1,652 0 7
35 — — — — — — — 2006 2–3 40.0% #299 1,642 0 7
36 — — — — — — — 2007 1–3 25.0% #190 1,614 0 7
37 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% #391 1,592 0 7

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anke Huber Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1989 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1990 8 4 12 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 1986 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
16 1991 15 6 21 71.4% 9 4 13 69.2% 3 1 4 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1987 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1992 10 5 15 66.7% 9 5 14 64.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 10 5 15 66.7% 1988 8 7 15 53.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 4 7 42.9% 6 4 10 60.0%
18 1993 16 7 23 69.6% 16 4 20 80.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 1989 10 7 17 58.8% 3 9 12 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0%
19 1994 11 6 17 64.7% 13 4 17 76.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 13 5 18 72.2% 1990 9 8 17 52.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 4 8 50.0%
20 1995 19 8 27 70.4% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 12 3 15 80.0% 1991 9 8 17 52.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
21 1996 21 8 29 72.4% 8 4 12 66.7% 7 1 8 87.5% 11 3 14 78.6% 1992 11 8 19 57.9% 14 6 20 70.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 5 6 16.7%
22 1997 17 10 27 63.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 10 7 17 58.8% 1993 6 8 14 42.9% 14 6 20 70.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 4 6 33.3%
23 1998 17 10 27 63.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 8 7 15 53.3% 1994 13 6 19 68.4% 18 7 25 72.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 9 5 14 64.3%
24 1999 19 13 32 59.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 8 16 50.0% 1995 20 6 26 76.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 10 4 14 71.4%
25 2000 7 10 17 41.2% 18 4 22 81.8% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1996 18 8 26 69.2% 5 3 8 62.5% 6 3 9 66.7% 8 5 13 61.5%
26 2001 16 9 25 64.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 3 1 4 75.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 1997 6 9 15 40.0% 11 7 18 61.1% 5 2 7 71.4% 12 7 19 63.2%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 2 5 7 28.6% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 177 97 274 64.6% 96 45 141 68.1% 31 13 44 70.5% 94 50 144 65.3% — 115 88 203 56.7% 79 57 136 58.1% 48 28 76 63.2% 56 49 105 53.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anke Huber Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1989 1518 106.7 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.34 1–1 1–0 — -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1990 1709 138.4 — — — — +14 -175 — 57.7% +0.90 4–4 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 101.7 -0.06 1986 1491 102.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.09
16 1991 1959 161.7 — — — — -23 -215 -283 67.0% +1.21 6–5 (55%) 4–3 (57%) 104.1 -0.97 1987 1516 114.3 — — — — +14 +66 — 44.4% +0.59 3–2 (60%) 0–4 (0%) 99.6 +0.98
17 1992 1974 163.5 — — — — +13 -112 -289 64.1% +1.16 7–6 (54%) 5–4 (56%) 102.2 -1.03 1988 1676 132.1 — — — — -3 -46 -109 50.0% -0.12 7–5 (58%) 9–5 (64%) 105.0 +1.87
18 1993 2059 162.3 — — — — -40 -16 -298 66.1% +0.98 13–4 (76%) 7–6 (54%) 107.2 -1.91 1989 1600 127.5 — — — — +72 -49 -48 42.7% -0.39 7–8 (47%) 6–9 (40%) 96.4 +0.98
19 1994 2030 158.8 — — — — -9 +18 — 64.5% +1.13 12–6 (67%) 6–4 (60%) 102.9 +0.55 1990 1676 128.3 — — — — +2 -134 -49 51.9% -0.08 4–5 (44%) 5–8 (38%) 95.5 +0.09
20 1995 2083 168.0 — — — — +12 -34 -316 66.2% +1.32 13–4 (76%) 6–5 (55%) 103.3 -1.78 1991 1799 143.8 — — — — -69 -241 +12 54.0% +0.18 8–6 (57%) 10–4 (71%) 109.5 -1.70
21 1996 2032 160.5 — — — — +30 -42 -104 66.2% +1.29 17–6 (74%) 7–10 (41%) 99.9 +2.81 1992 1823 148.5 — — — — -54 -53 +64 55.6% +0.34 14–10 (58%) 9–7 (56%) 105.5 -0.55
22 1997 1969 163.8 — — — — +39 -72 -51 57.6% +0.58 12–10 (55%) 5–6 (45%) 96.0 -1.85 1993 1792 145.4 — — — — -104 +99 +125 57.4% +0.44 5–6 (45%) 5–2 (71%) 101.4 -1.23
23 1998 1900 158.7 — — — — +4 — — 55.0% +0.39 9–7 (56%) 3–7 (30%) 93.2 -0.86 1994 1886 147.7 — — — — -40 +53 -14 62.7% +0.70 11–3 (79%) 11–7 (61%) 112.3 +0.33
24 1999 1872 155.9 — — — — +5 -59 -11 52.6% +0.17 11–10 (52%) 5–5 (50%) 97.6 -1.51 1995 1971 149.3 — — — — +20 -90 -60 64.5% +0.82 15–4 (79%) 13–12 (52%) 104.4 +1.45
25 2000 1896 145.4 — — — — -95 +65 +31 60.0% +0.73 10–7 (59%) 7–7 (50%) 99.9 +0.44 1996 1911 151.8 — — — — +44 -26 +47 60.6% +0.51 14–6 (70%) 13–12 (52%) 99.9 +1.96
26 2001 1834 151.0 — — — — +12 +62 +138 62.2% +0.78 8–9 (47%) 8–4 (67%) 99.3 +0.22 1997 1856 146.3 — — — — -5 +2 +142 57.7% +0.51 11–9 (55%) 11–5 (69%) 100.3 -0.20
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1675 104.7 — — — — +65 +68 — 39.1% -1.04 0–3 (0%) 3–2 (60%) 96.5 +1.05
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1653 98.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.18
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1642 101.1 -1.73 -1.74 0.650 43.0% — — +401 36.4% -0.82 1–0 1–1 — -0.10
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1614 101.2 -1.59 -2.16 0.779 45.4% +53 — — 25.0% -1.63 — 0–2 — -0.39
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1592 96.8 +1.39 -2.63 0.741 44.9% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.16
Career — 2123 165.4 — — — — +2 -32 -124 61.8% +0.88 123–79 (61%) 66–63 (51%) 100.5 -1.02 — 2025 147.4 -1.20 -2.11 0.735 44.6% -6 -3 +29 55.4% +0.29 100–69 (59%) 96–80 (55%) 105.7 +0.96

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.