H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Anke Huber vs Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy H2H: 5-1

Anke Huber holds a 5–1 lead over Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Anke Huber leads 2–0 on carpet, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Anke Huber won the 1996 Filderstadt fourth round 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anke Huber
GER Age 51 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
5 – 1
6 main draw meetings
Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy
NED Age 55 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 11, 1996* Filderstadt WTA 250 R16 Hard Anke Huber #5 6-1 6-4 Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #11 Match data
Nov 13, 1995 WTA Tour Championships WTA Finals SF Carpet Anke Huber #12 6-3 6-3 Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #14 Match data
Jun 1, 1995* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Anke Huber #11 6-4 6-4 Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #16 Match data
May 14, 1994* Berlin WTA 1000 SF Clay Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #28 7-6 6-3 Anke Huber #11 Match data
Aug 19, 1993* Montreal WTA 1000 R32 Hard Anke Huber #10 6-3 6-0 Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #32 Match data
Oct 23, 1992* Brighton WTA 250 R32 Carpet Anke Huber #11 6-1 3-6 6-4 Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #29 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Anke Huber #18 #4 2,721 2,130 393 203 65.9% 0 1 0 1 10 12
Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #919 #9 1,672 2,025 295 220 57.3% 0 0 0 0 7 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anke Huber Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1989 1–1 50.0% #199 1,517 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1990 14–9 60.9% #37 1,708 0 1 1986 0–1 0.0% — 1,490 0 0
16 1991 30–13 69.8% #14 1,959 0 2 1987 5–6 45.5% #149 1,515 0 0
17 1992 28–15 65.1% #11 1,964 0 2 1988 21–18 53.8% #40 1,689 0 0
18 1993 41–15 73.2% #10 2,056 0 3 1989 15–22 40.5% #83 1,603 0 0
19 1994 38–16 70.4% #12 2,027 0 6 1990 18–17 51.4% #43 1,677 0 0
20 1995 41–15 73.2% #10 2,091 0 7 1991 24–19 55.8% #30 1,799 0 1
21 1996 45–15 75.0% #7 2,055 0 10 1992 30–20 60.0% #33 1,818 0 2
22 1997 34–24 58.6% #13 1,954 0 10 1993 26–20 56.5% #40 1,789 0 3
23 1998 25–18 58.1% #21 1,898 0 10 1994 44–21 67.7% #15 1,885 0 3
24 1999 32–26 55.2% #16 1,886 0 10 1995 37–15 71.2% #13 1,970 0 5
25 2000 29–16 64.4% #19 1,898 0 12 1996 35–18 66.0% #12 1,908 0 6
26 2001 35–20 63.6% #18 1,834 0 12 1997 34–25 57.6% #15 1,855 0 7
27 — — — — — — — 1998 3–10 23.1% #188 1,673 0 7
28 — — — — — — — 1999 0–1 0.0% #893 1,651 0 7
35 — — — — — — — 2006 2–3 40.0% #299 1,642 0 7
36 — — — — — — — 2007 1–3 25.0% #190 1,614 0 7
37 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% #391 1,592 0 7