H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Anke Huber vs Claudia Porwik H2H: 1-0
Anke Huber holds a 1–0 lead over Claudia Porwik in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anke Huber leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Anke Huber won the 1992 Leipzig fourth round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 51
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 57
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2, 1992* | Leipzig | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Anke Huber | 6-2 6-3 | Claudia Porwik | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anke Huber | #18 | #4 | 2,721 | 2,130 | 393 | 203 | 65.9% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 12 |
| Claudia Porwik | #579 | #29 | 148 | 1,788 | 114 | 146 | 43.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anke Huber | Claudia Porwik | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1989 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #199 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1990 | 14–9 | 60.9% | #37 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1991 | 30–13 | 69.8% | #14 | 1,959 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1992 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #11 | 1,964 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #96 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1993 | 41–15 | 73.2% | #10 | 2,056 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #104 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1994 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #12 | 2,027 | 0 | 6 | 1988 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #68 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1995 | 41–15 | 73.2% | #10 | 2,091 | 0 | 7 | 1989 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #75 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #7 | 2,055 | 0 | 10 | 1990 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #29 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1997 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #13 | 1,954 | 0 | 10 | 1991 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #80 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1998 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #21 | 1,898 | 0 | 10 | 1992 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1999 | 32–26 | 55.2% | #16 | 1,886 | 0 | 10 | 1993 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #92 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2000 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #19 | 1,898 | 0 | 12 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #256 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2001 | 35–20 | 63.6% | #18 | 1,834 | 0 | 12 | 1995 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #133 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #153 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |