H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Anke Huber vs Claudia Porwik H2H: 1-0

Anke Huber holds a 1–0 lead over Claudia Porwik in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anke Huber leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Anke Huber won the 1992 Leipzig round of 16 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anke Huber
GER Age 51 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Claudia Porwik
GER Age 57

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Anke Huber #9 6-2 6-3 Claudia Porwik #86 Match data Oct 2, 1992* R16 Leipzig Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anke Huber #18 #4 2,721 2,122 398 205 66.0% 0 1 0 4 7 12
Claudia Porwik #579 #29 148 1,786 114 146 43.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anke Huber Claudia Porwik
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1989 1–1 50.0% #199 1,518 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1990 14–9 60.9% #37 1,708 0 1 — — — — — — —
16 1991 30–13 69.8% #14 1,959 0 2 — — — — — — —
17 1992 31–16 66.0% #11 1,973 0 2 1986 6–5 54.5% #96 1,577 0 0
18 1993 41–15 73.2% #10 2,058 0 3 1987 13–19 40.6% #104 1,581 0 0
19 1994 38–16 70.4% #12 2,030 0 6 1988 11–16 40.7% #68 1,571 0 0
20 1995 41–15 73.2% #10 2,082 0 7 1989 19–18 51.4% #75 1,660 0 0
21 1996 47–16 74.6% #6 2,031 0 10 1990 18–17 51.4% #29 1,667 0 0
22 1997 34–24 58.6% #13 1,969 0 10 1991 14–20 41.2% #80 1,644 0 0
23 1998 25–18 58.1% #21 1,900 0 10 1992 12–18 40.0% #98 1,605 0 0
24 1999 32–26 55.2% #16 1,872 0 10 1993 13–20 39.4% #92 1,601 0 0
25 2000 29–16 64.4% #19 1,895 0 12 1994 0–1 0.0% #256 1,585 0 0
26 2001 35–20 63.6% #18 1,834 0 12 1995 4–7 36.4% #133 1,551 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 1996 4–5 44.4% #153 1,563 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anke Huber Claudia Porwik
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1989 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1990 8 4 12 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1991 15 6 21 71.4% 9 4 13 69.2% 3 1 4 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1992 10 5 15 66.7% 9 5 14 64.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 10 5 15 66.7% 1986 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1993 16 7 23 69.6% 16 4 20 80.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 1987 4 7 11 36.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
19 1994 11 6 17 64.7% 13 4 17 76.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 13 5 18 72.2% 1988 7 6 13 53.8% 0 4 4 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
20 1995 19 8 27 70.4% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 12 3 15 80.0% 1989 15 13 28 53.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1996 21 8 29 72.4% 8 4 12 66.7% 7 1 8 87.5% 11 3 14 78.6% 1990 16 12 28 57.1% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
22 1997 17 10 27 63.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 10 7 17 58.8% 1991 10 13 23 43.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
23 1998 17 10 27 63.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 8 7 15 53.3% 1992 5 11 16 31.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6%
24 1999 19 13 32 59.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 8 16 50.0% 1993 7 11 18 38.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
25 2000 7 10 17 41.2% 18 4 22 81.8% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1994 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2001 16 9 25 64.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 3 1 4 75.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 1995 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 177 97 274 64.6% 96 45 141 68.1% 31 13 44 70.5% 94 50 144 65.3% — 73 83 156 46.8% 13 21 34 38.2% 11 20 31 35.5% 17 22 39 43.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anke Huber Claudia Porwik
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1989 1518 106.7 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.34 1–1 1–0 — -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1990 1709 138.4 — — — — +14 -175 — 57.7% +0.90 4–4 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 101.7 -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1991 1959 161.7 — — — — -23 -215 -283 67.0% +1.21 6–5 (55%) 4–3 (57%) 104.1 -0.97 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1992 1974 163.5 — — — — +13 -112 -289 64.1% +1.16 7–6 (54%) 5–4 (56%) 102.2 -1.03 1986 1577 117.2 — — — — +14 +33 — 50.0% -0.42 3–1 (75%) 3–1 (75%) 105.3 +0.65
18 1993 2059 162.3 — — — — -40 -16 -298 66.1% +0.98 13–4 (76%) 7–6 (54%) 107.2 -1.91 1987 1582 120.5 — — — — -4 +32 -42 44.7% -0.46 4–8 (33%) 4–1 (80%) 97.8 +1.43
19 1994 2030 158.8 — — — — -9 +18 — 64.5% +1.13 12–6 (67%) 6–4 (60%) 102.9 +0.55 1988 1572 125.4 — — — — +20 -30 +14 41.4% -0.72 2–2 (50%) 5–2 (71%) 103.4 +0.38
20 1995 2083 168.0 — — — — +12 -34 -316 66.2% +1.32 13–4 (76%) 6–5 (55%) 103.3 -1.78 1989 1661 127.0 — — — — 0 -72 — 52.9% +0.09 4–7 (36%) 2–3 (40%) 97.4 +0.85
21 1996 2032 160.5 — — — — +30 -42 -104 66.2% +1.29 17–6 (74%) 7–10 (41%) 99.9 +2.81 1990 1667 133.5 — — — — +11 — — 52.5% +0.25 6–8 (43%) 5–2 (71%) 99.4 +1.00
22 1997 1969 163.8 — — — — +39 -72 -51 57.6% +0.58 12–10 (55%) 5–6 (45%) 96.0 -1.85 1991 1645 123.9 — — — — +28 -98 — 42.7% -0.60 3–4 (43%) 5–4 (56%) 100.4 -1.33
23 1998 1900 158.7 — — — — +4 — — 55.0% +0.39 9–7 (56%) 3–7 (30%) 93.2 -0.86 1992 1606 119.1 — — — — +1 — -25 43.3% -0.63 4–5 (44%) 2–2 (50%) 97.3 +1.85
24 1999 1872 155.9 — — — — +5 -59 -11 52.6% +0.17 11–10 (52%) 5–5 (50%) 97.6 -1.51 1993 1601 124.1 — — — — -13 -41 +10 42.3% -0.62 3–4 (43%) 3–4 (43%) 97.9 -0.38
25 2000 1896 145.4 — — — — -95 +65 +31 60.0% +0.73 10–7 (59%) 7–7 (50%) 99.9 +0.44 1994 1585 97.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.19
26 2001 1834 151.0 — — — — +12 +62 +138 62.2% +0.78 8–9 (47%) 8–4 (67%) 99.3 +0.22 1995 1551 111.6 — — — — +11 — — 44.4% +0.07 1–4 (20%) 1–4 (20%) 95.2 -0.10
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1564 110.4 — — — — +28 — — 55.0% +0.25 1–3 (25%) — — +0.74
Career — 2123 165.4 — — — — +2 -32 -124 61.8% +0.88 123–79 (61%) 66–63 (51%) 100.5 -1.02 — 1787 129.2 — — — — +7 -22 -6 46.3% -0.33 31–46 (40%) 30–23 (57%) 98.7 +2.04

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.