H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Anke Huber vs Dominique Monami H2H: 2-1
Anke Huber holds a 2–1 lead over Dominique Monami in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Dominique Monami leads 1–0 on carpet, while Anke Huber leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Dominique Monami won the 1997 Kremlin Cup third round 5-7 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 51
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 53
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 1997* | Kremlin Cup | WTA 1000 | R32 | Carpet | Dominique Monami | 5-7 6-4 6-3 | Anke Huber | Match data |
| Jun 22, 1996* | Rosmalen | WTA 250 | QF | Grass | Anke Huber | 3-6 6-3 7-6 | Dominique Monami | Match data |
| Feb 17, 1996* | Paris | WTA 500 | R16 | Clay | Anke Huber | 7-6 7-6 | Dominique Monami | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anke Huber | #18 | #4 | 2,721 | 2,130 | 393 | 203 | 65.9% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 12 |
| Dominique Monami | #24 | #9 | 2,196 | 1,973 | 205 | 156 | 56.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anke Huber | Dominique Monami | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1989 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #199 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1990 | 14–9 | 60.9% | #37 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1991 | 30–13 | 69.8% | #14 | 1,959 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1992 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #11 | 1,964 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1993 | 41–15 | 73.2% | #10 | 2,056 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #129 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1994 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #12 | 2,027 | 0 | 6 | 1992 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #99 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1995 | 41–15 | 73.2% | #10 | 2,091 | 0 | 7 | 1993 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #59 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #7 | 2,055 | 0 | 10 | 1994 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #134 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1997 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #13 | 1,954 | 0 | 10 | 1995 | 12–9 | 57.1% | #43 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1998 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #21 | 1,898 | 0 | 10 | 1996 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #48 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1999 | 32–26 | 55.2% | #16 | 1,886 | 0 | 10 | 1997 | 39–17 | 69.6% | #18 | 1,875 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2000 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #19 | 1,898 | 0 | 12 | 1998 | 45–24 | 65.2% | #12 | 1,917 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2001 | 35–20 | 63.6% | #18 | 1,834 | 0 | 12 | 1999 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #14 | 1,839 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #24 | 1,814 | 0 | 4 |