H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Anke Huber vs Fang Li H2H: 1-0
Anke Huber holds a 1–0 lead over Fang Li in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anke Huber leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anke Huber won the 1998 Tokyo fourth round 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 51
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 25, 1998* | Tokyo | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Anke Huber | 7-5 6-3 | Fang Li | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anke Huber | #18 | #4 | 2,721 | 2,130 | 393 | 203 | 65.9% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 12 |
| Fang Li | #488 | #36 | 723 | 1,705 | 67 | 89 | 42.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Anke Huber | Fang Li | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1989 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #199 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #119 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 14–9 | 60.9% | #37 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #132 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 30–13 | 69.8% | #14 | 1,959 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #67 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #11 | 1,964 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #93 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 41–15 | 73.2% | #10 | 2,056 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #199 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #12 | 2,027 | 0 | 6 | 1997 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #69 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 41–15 | 73.2% | #10 | 2,091 | 0 | 7 | 1998 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #40 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #7 | 2,055 | 0 | 10 | 1999 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #86 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #13 | 1,954 | 0 | 10 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #503 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #21 | 1,898 | 0 | 10 | 2001 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #488 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 32–26 | 55.2% | #16 | 1,886 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2000 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #19 | 1,898 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2001 | 35–20 | 63.6% | #18 | 1,834 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |